AuditBoard vs Workiva Wdesk comparison

AuditBoard and Workiva are both solutions in the GRC category. AuditBoard is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.7, while Workiva is ranked #5 with an average rating of 6.8. AuditBoard holds a 7.7% mindshare in G, compared to Workiva’s 7.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of AuditBoard users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Workiva users who would recommend it.

AuditBoard

Read 12 AuditBoard reviews

1,557 Views
788 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Workiva Wdesk

Read 7 Workiva Wdesk reviews

1,431 Views
847 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

AuditBoard

Workiva Wdesk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

Workiva Wdesk and AuditBoard offer enterprise solutions with distinct features. AuditBoard seems to have an advantage due to its comprehensive feature set, though Workiva Wdesk competes well with attractive pricing and support.

Features: Workiva Wdesk provides a platform for financial reporting and compliance, focusing on collaboration and accuracy. This includes real-time data integration and user-friendly data management tools. Its ERP connectivity supports effective data handling. AuditBoard offers features for risk management and internal audit, with streamlined processes across departments. It emphasizes audit workflows and cross-functional collaboration. Its community tools enhance internal communications, and cloud storage ensures data security.

Room for Improvement: Workiva Wdesk could enhance its data automation processes and strengthen API integrations for better connectivity. It also might improve customization options for diverse business needs. AuditBoard can work on expanding its compatibility with other software solutions and offering more diverse reporting templates. Additionally, it might benefit from enhancing its user training resources and simplifying its interface for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Workiva Wdesk provides a cloud-based solution that supports rapid deployment and offers dedicated customer support for onboarding. Similarly, AuditBoard operates on a cloud platform, ensuring easy installation and providing ongoing support services, with a strong focus on ease of use and responsive service for quick adaptation.

Pricing and ROI: Workiva Wdesk maintains a cost-effective pricing model aimed at maximizing ROI with its flexible structure accompanying comprehensive functionalities. AuditBoard may have a higher initial setup cost, but its targeted features often justify this by delivering significant ROI through process efficiencies and resource optimization.

To learn more, read our detailed AuditBoard vs. Workiva Wdesk Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard vs. Workiva Wdesk

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,388 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AuditBoard

Ranking in GRC

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Vendor Risk Management (5th)

Workiva Wdesk

Ranking in GRC

5th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Performance Management (12th), Financial Close Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the GRC category, the mindshare of AuditBoard is 7.7%, up from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Workiva Wdesk is 7.8%, up from 5.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

GRC

Featured Reviews

Gopichand Rajbhar

IT GRC Manager at Capgemini

User-friendly, simple to implement, and has lots of features

There are lots of features. We like the reviewer and auditor, where they support you if you want to upload evidence. At the same time the reviewer or auditor can also put their remark. The solution is user-friendly. It's easy to set up. You can easily find out how to proceed for reassessment, how to upload that evidence, and how you can put in a remark. Everything is a single console where you can easily track what you need. It's stable. The product is scalable. They provide a demo to customers to allow them to explore the tools.

Read full review

Phillip Gough

Partner, Financial Services at Deloitte TT

The solution is easy to deploy and enables collaboration, but it must improve its speed and enable users to create pivot tables

I rate the ease of setup an eight out of ten. The initial setup was straightforward. The solution is cloud-based. We deployed the product along with Wdata in six months. It was for a lot of use cases. To deploy the tool, we designed the use cases and developed them. Then, we went through unit tests, integration tests, and user acceptance tests. It was an Agile delivery cycle.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is that everybody can use the same tool. You can give a person permission to use AuditBoard and define their access to the Audit Table. For example, we can allow external auditors or clients to review our completed tests. The clients are attached to specific tests that happen regularly, like inventory counts and asset counts. Debt compliance is only done once annually."

"For AuditBoard, the simple workflow made it very easy to code with the group."

"AuditBoard is very user-friendly compared to other audit management software I have used in the past."

"Its ability to share the data in real-time has helped us well."

"The most valuable feature is the well-documented instruction."

"In AuditBoard, there are all the audit steps, including documentation, archiving, and tracking the progress of audits."

"The most significant feature of AuditBoard is its community tools. It provides an internal communication platform that enables users to communicate within the system rather than relying on external tools such as Outlook or Microsoft products. By communicating within the system, all interactions are centralized and accessible, promoting a streamlined workflow."

"Considering the solution's return on investment, it has been extremely helpful since we were doing a lot of documentation. Previously, in our company, we were using an Excel sheet which made things quite messy."

More AuditBoard pros

"It helps you to maintain a backup of your data, including the connectivity with the tables, which provides a user-friendly way to handle and access your files."

"The collaboration within the platform is valuable."

"The cross-functionality between connectivity, whether through API connections between different software platforms or the connection of data collection to the actual written ESG report, is highly valuable. The connectivity of all these aspects significantly aids in data assurance, which I consider a bonus."

"Workiva Wdesk is pretty good in terms of getting the data from the system, automating the reporting schedules...It has a very good integration with ERP tools."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to easily upload and update financial results, creating a dynamic data sheet."

"Workiva Wdesk has a flow diagram that is standardized, making it easy for people to file documents on ECDAs, which are in HTML format."

"It makes the compliance process more efficient and more effective."

Cons

"AuditBoard has the potential for improvement in a few key areas. Firstly, I have experienced instances where the platform has experienced technical issues and ceased to function effectively. Additionally, the editing tools provided within the platform can be slow and laggy, particularly when trying to access and edit important documents. This can be a hindrance to my workflow and efficiency. To address these issues, they should begin by improving the speed and reliability of the platform, as well as enhancing the search engine to make it easier to find specific controls and documents within the platform."

"AuditBoard is overly simple in some instances and there needs to be flexibility to make it more robust."

"AuditBoard could benefit from the addition of video capabilities, although it is not a necessity. Small companies that cannot afford licenses for Microsoft Teams or Zoom would benefit greatly from this feature, as it would enhance the communication process."

"The layout for the end user could be improved."

"The initial setup is somewhat difficult because it has multiple pieces that need to be stitched together. You have to integrate it with the business unit you want to test if you want to go down from the corporate level to the operational level."

"Some of that flexibility could be enhanced. When comparing Archer and TeamMate+, there is a little more open-ended in terms of certain of our audit processes and procedures. And there is significantly greater freedom in creating ad hoc audit processes and procedures, whereas AuditBoard is a little more limiting in this regard."

"They should improve the solution's test sheets feature for ease of use."

"A handful of things in the solution need to be improved. One of them is better communication of updates to the system or tool itself."

More AuditBoard cons

"With this product, it's more about the integrated data model where you can have a one-to-many/many-to-one relationship between your policies and processes, risks, and controls. They need to showcase how you can put those pieces together."

"The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandatory or voluntary reporting requirements, leading to lost linkage connections that must be manually reset each time a change is made. This aspect is not functional now, and I see it as an opportunity for improvement."

"Regarding the solution, reporting has certain areas that can be considered for improvement."

"At this point, I don't see a compelling reason to invest in Workiva. It may be necessary for compliance and controlling the version of SCC, but not everyone needs its high-end capabilities."

"The speed must be improved."

"One area where Workiva Wdesk could improve is by ensuring that its cloud-based system is fully compatible with the most current versions of PowerPoint and Excel."

"The most critical issue is the need to shift between uppercase and lowercase."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is variable, like with any technology, and is determined by how hard you wish to negotiate. You can get to a price you're willing to pay if you're willing to negotiate aggressively."

"I highly recommend this tool as the price is reasonable. However, consistent pricing is important, and having a loyalty program that rewards long-term customers with lower prices would be a great addition."

"Our clients in Asia think that the solution is too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

19%

Educational Organization

13%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AuditBoard?

It consolidates the E2E process in one single solution, and in a very user friendly environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AuditBoard?

AuditBoard is overly simple in some instances and there needs to be flexibility to make it more robust. For IBM OpenPages, the reporting can be more robust as the summary report on each of the modu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AuditBoard?

I used AuditBoard primarily for risk assessment questionnaires in a very premature risk environment. I also have experience with IBM OpenPages, mostly for operational risk to track issues, to look ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Workiva Wdesk?

The most valuable feature is its ability to easily upload and update financial results, creating a dynamic data sheet.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workiva Wdesk?

Wdesk is affordable and as far as I'm aware, there were no additional costs beyond the standard license increase. We didn't have to make any other changes; it primarily involved accessing the platf...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Workiva Wdesk?

The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandat...

See all answers

Comparisons

RSA Archer vs AuditBoard

Compared 23% of the time

OneTrust GRC vs AuditBoard

Compared 21% of the time

LogicGate vs AuditBoard

Compared 7% of the time

ServiceNow Vendor Risk Management vs AuditBoard

Compared 5% of the time

More AuditBoard Competitors

CCH Tagetik vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 10% of the time

RSA Archer vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 8% of the time

OneTrust GRC vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 7% of the time

Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 7% of the time

More Workiva Wdesk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard

March 2025

Download AuditBoard product report

Buyer's Guide

Workiva Wdesk

March 2025

Download Workiva Wdesk product report

Also Known As

No data available

Wdesk

Overview

AuditBoard is the leading cloud-based platform transforming audit, risk, and compliance management. More than 35% of the Fortune 500 leverage AuditBoard to move their businesses forward with greater clarity and agility. AuditBoard is top-rated by customers on G2, Capterra, and Gartner Peer Insights, and was recently ranked for the fourth year in a row as one of the fastest-growing technology companies in North America by Deloitte. To learn more, visit: AuditBoard.com.

AuditBoard

Wdesk is used across the enterprise to support hundreds of data collaboration, reporting, and compliance processes. Use Wdesk to:

Optimize your structured and composite reports
Improve trust in your data, reports, and presentations
Transform processes to enable insight

Workiva

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Noodles Company, eBay, Winnebago, American Assets Trust, AmericanEnterprise, Calpian, Capstone Infrastructure, Cascades, Circor International, Coeur Mining, Davey, Dr Pepper Snapple

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard vs. Workiva Wdesk

March 2025

Free Report: AuditBoard vs. Workiva Wdesk

Find out what your peers are saying about AuditBoard vs. Workiva Wdesk and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AuditBoard vs. Workiva Wdesk report.

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.