Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Lucene vs Oracle Endeca comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Lucene
Ranking in Indexing and Search
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Endeca
Ranking in Indexing and Search
12th
Average Rating
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Indexing and Search category, the mindshare of Lucene is 5.9%, up from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Endeca is 3.3%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Indexing and Search
 

Featured Reviews

it_user1158 - PeerSpot reviewer
One of the best open source date indexing tools available, with support for various popular file formats like PDF, HTML, etc.
- For Java users, there is a performance penalty due to the well known fact that JVM(Java Virtual Memory) is a memory hogger. Scalability is an issue as well. - If you have a requirement of adding custom algorithms for indexing data, you might face a little difficulty, as there is not much information available either in Lucene forums or mailing lists. Though community support is excellent for Java users, for other area specific Programming Platforms like Perl, and Delphi, it is a bit difficult to get solutions for your problems, as the tool is still not that stable in these platforms and is still in the incubation phase.
it_user6903 - PeerSpot reviewer
It’s got a good range of data visualisation components, but lacks the support for runtime complex query firing and support which OBIEE supports.
Primarily, a BI tool that enables analysis of unstructured and semi-structured data, as well as more traditional structured (measures, dimensions etc) data sets with ability to bring together loosely-related datasets and analyse them using search and lexical analysis tools. The in-memory key-value store database it uses doesn’t have the same costs around data manipulation, table joins and disk access that traditional databases have, and the column-based storage it uses is particularly suited to selecting from sets of dimension members.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Indexing and Search solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Endeca
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bloomberg, Salesforce, Bank of America, AT&T, SAP, JP Morgan Chase, Capital One, DirecTV, Boeing, Monsanto, Warner Bros, The Walt Disney Company, Goldman Sachs, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, BlackRock
Virgin Media, Agilent, NHS Business Services Authority, IBFD, Valdosta State University, Ministry of Labor and Social Policy, Delphi Automotive, Riverbed
Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Luigi's Box, IBM and others in Indexing and Search. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.