Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

MariaDB vs OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

MariaDB
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
59
Ranking in other categories
Open Source Databases (4th), Relational Databases Tools (4th)
OpenText Analytics Database...
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
86
Ranking in other categories
Data Warehouse (6th), Cloud Data Warehouse (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

MariaDB and OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. MariaDB is designed for Open Source Databases and holds a mindshare of 6.7%, down 9.8% compared to last year.
OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica), on the other hand, focuses on Data Warehouse, holds 8.0% mindshare, down 9.1% since last year.
Open Source Databases
Data Warehouse
 

Featured Reviews

KumarManish - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to deploy, cost-effective, and integrates seamlessly with other products
We had planned for an RDBMS version and not NoSQL. We use MariaDB Galera Cluster. It's a good product. It is cheap, scalable, performs well, and is efficient. We use GCP’s BigQuery for machine learning. We must follow the best practices of the tool. We missed some best practices like the storage engine and InnoDB. It was very difficult to identify why we were having performance issues. Then, we realized that some of our tables were still on MyISAM, the default storage engine. When we switched it back to the InnoDB, it was very smooth. InnoDB is the recommended one. We must follow the best practices given in the documentation during the initial setup. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.
T Venkatesh - PeerSpot reviewer
Processes query faster through multiple systems simultaneously, but it could support different data types
We use the solution for various tasks, including preparing data marts and generating offers. It helps extract data based on rules from the policy team and provides insights to enhance business operations. We also analyze transactions to target customers and improve business performance The…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's easy to set up."
"The product has been stable and reliable."
"This solution is user-friendly."
"The speed and functionality are the most valuable features."
"The most valuable feature is that it uses multiple cores, which is better than some of the other databases."
"We like the easy way that we can collect data from other databases."
"The performance is very good."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is a cloud-based tool, so it is pretty fast."
"It maximizes cloud economics with Eon Mode by scaling cluster size to meet variable workload demands."
"It's the fastest database I have ever tested. That's the most important feature of Vertica."
"The solution has great capabilities. The tool that instructs the internal database forward is easy to use and is very powerful."
"Vertica is easy to use and provides really high performance, stability, and scalability."
"The performance is very good and the aggregate records are fast."
"Its analytics has enabled Pythian's clients to get the business insights as quick as they wanted. Its lower maintenance has also improved the ROI."
"Eighty percent of the ETL operations have improved since implementing this solution."
"Vertica is a great product because customers can compress and code data. The infrastructure that data warehouse solutions need is a commodity server so that customers don't have to invest in infrastructure."
 

Cons

"The only potential area for improvement could be the pricing model, which might benefit from being more flexible or a bit cheaper."
"The maintenance and performance could be a bit better."
"In the next release, I would like to see improvements in the scalability and redundancy features."
"The customer service and support are okay. But the response time is slow. Moreover, the material is not available freely."
"Replication could be better, and it's not so simple. It would be better if they had a replication server. It would make things a lot easier. You need to have that replication server, but not in the same server farm. Then there will be a bit of latency between both because you should have one in one city and another one in a different city. That kind of solution should be more baked into every single database today. Mirroring the database in a live environment where any record written on the production server replicates instantly across the fiber on the other server wasn't easy. Many people don't even bother with that, and they just run one server."
"It's not very stable. It needs improvement."
"It does not have tools for debugging procedures and functions."
"While MariaDB is a good relational database, it can be inflexible for complex use cases."
"Performance of management of metadata layer (database catalog) needs improvement. We still have to have smaller customers on PostgreSQL; Vertica cannot manage thousands of schemata."
"Metadata for database files scale okay, but metadata related to tables/columns/sequences must be stored on all nodes."
"The documentation of Vertica is an area with shortcomings where improvements are required."
"If you do not utilize the tuning tools like projections, encoding, partitions, and statistics, then performance and scalability will suffer."
"I would personally like to see extended developer tooling suited to Vertica – think published PowerDesigner SQL dialect support."
"Limitations in group by projections is where I would like to see an improvement."
"Suboptimal projection design causes queries to not scale linearly."
"It's hard to make it slow for a small data volume. For large volumes, it's hard to make it work. It's also hard to make it faster, and to make it scale."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a monthly subscription to use MariaDB."
"When it comes to MariaDB, it should have a more cost-effective license."
"The product is not expensive."
"MariaDB is an open-source software, meaning I don't need to pay for the product."
"The licensing cost is approximately $4000.00 per year and the licensing is based on the software and the number of posts that you make."
"It is an open-source solution."
"I used the open-source version, which is available free of charge."
"It's an open-source solution."
"I am aware that we have licensed it, but I have no knowledge of its cost."
"It is fast to purchase through the AWS Marketplace."
"The solution is free and we pay for the storage."
"From a cost perspective, the software is less than most of its competitors."
"The solution is relatively cost-effective."
"Read the fine print carefully."
"The pricing depends on the license model because there are several. It depends on the client, but it's cheaper than other solutions. I think it's cheap for all the functionality and robustness. It's not very expensive to deploy."
"It's an expensive product"
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.
863,776 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about MariaDB?
The integration with other products is seamless.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MariaDB?
I have found the price of commercial MariaDB to be pretty steep, although not as high as Oracle. Customers often prefer the Community Edition because it's free.
What needs improvement with MariaDB?
The only potential area for improvement could be the pricing model, which might benefit from being more flexible or a bit cheaper.
What do you like most about Vertica?
Vertica is easy to use and provides really high performance, stability, and scalability.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Vertica?
The solution is relatively cost-effective. Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to other solutions.
What needs improvement with Vertica?
The product could improve by adding support for a wider variety of data types and enhancing features to better compete with other databases.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus Vertica, HPE Vertica, HPE Vertica on Demand
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Google, Wikipedia, Tencent, Verizon, DBS Bank, Deutsche Bank, Telefónica, Huatai Securities
Cerner, Game Show Network Game, Guess by Marciano, Supercell, Etsy, Nascar, Empirix, adMarketplace, and Cardlytics.
Find out what your peers are saying about Firebird, Oracle, PostgreSQL and others in Open Source Databases. Updated: July 2025.
863,776 professionals have used our research since 2012.