We performed a comparison between MarkLogic and MongoDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."MarkLogic's greatest asset is its strong engineering foundation. It was specifically designed with search capabilities in mind, and the developers placed a great emphasis on ensuring the quality of the indexing and all subsequent layers that were added."
"The rules can show us if there are missing items, like titles, and we can add them in to ensure everything is filled and makes sense and there are no missing details."
"MongoDB's best features are scalability, document management, and data security."
"Scalability seems good. I've never been even close to finding the limits. I've run a couple of notes of redundancy but I've never had any problems with scalability."
"The most valuable feature of MongoDB is the ease of connections, aggregation, and queries."
"It is convenient to use because we can do manipulations with the JSON data that we get. There are also a lot of joins and associations with MongoDB, which makes it easy to use for us."
"It's easy to add and remove things in MongoDB. You can alter the tables. MongoDB is faster at reading, slower at writings."
"I think that MongoDB isn't too structured, and that's good for our technical team because they are able to search through the database better than if they are using SQL Server."
"I find the integration with other tools very easy."
"One of the most valuable features of MongoDB is it is Its open source."
"The spreadsheet capabilities could be improved."
"One of the most common requests is to improve the user interface of the database. While it is primarily a database, there are other databases available that offer more user-friendly interfaces. The UI is good for developers but not for regular users. More visuals would be beneficial."
"The performance could be faster."
"It could be much more flexible like SequoiaDB. I would like to see more flexibility in the next release, especially when working with Microsoft Windows. A lot of people struggle with MongoDB because of their Windows versions. But Linux is faultless and mostly runs nicely."
"We'd like information about client onboarding experience and success stories. It would help to have something to show to internal stakeholders."
"The dashboard is an area of concern in the solution where improvements are required."
"The user interface is not as friendly as Oracle, which is something that can be improved."
"MongoDB should better support small and medium companies. There are a lot of clients out there that are interested, however, they need something lighter and less complex and something not so expensive upfront."
"The auto transaction feature is something that I found a little bit problematic. If we want to run two or three transactions at a time, we get write conflicts. So, it becomes really difficult when concurrency comes into the picture."
"I would like to see the scalability and security improved."
MarkLogic is ranked 9th in NoSQL Databases with 2 reviews while MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 70 reviews. MarkLogic is rated 9.6, while MongoDB is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of MarkLogic writes "Frequent updates, helpful search capabilities, and high quality support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Lightweight with good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data". MarkLogic is most compared with Cassandra, whereas MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, ScyllaDB, Cassandra and Oracle NoSQL. See our MarkLogic vs. MongoDB report.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.