![McAfee SiteAdvisor [EOL] vs. Webroot DNS Protection report](https://www.peerspot.com/assets/media/images/icons/pdf-80836ec5.svg){kind=icon}
![McAfee SiteAdvisor [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,f_auto,q_auto,w_64/KhY3BKx8jXkMHFMEa3DJ8dKd.jpg)
![McAfee SiteAdvisor [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,f_auto,q_auto,w_30/KhY3BKx8jXkMHFMEa3DJ8dKd.jpg){kind=small}
![McAfee SiteAdvisor [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,f_auto,q_auto,w_40/KhY3BKx8jXkMHFMEa3DJ8dKd.jpg){kind=small}
In my limited experience with Webroot, it has shown good scalability, particularly in the enterprise context. When it comes to Webroot DNS, I find it to be a nice solution but prefer a more comprehensive approach. I lean towards XDR vendors that can integrate DNS protection into a unified dashboard, especially as traditional anti-malware solutions like Webroot face challenges with evolving threat actors. Currently, I have around 60,000 Webroot users for anti-malware, but for DNS protection, it is a fraction—about one or two percent—since some clients opt for other solutions. Traditional anti-malware technology is becoming less effective against sophisticated threats.
