Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs TestingWhiz comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TestingWhiz
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (25th), Regression Testing Tools (14th)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user371871 - PeerSpot reviewer
We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night.
Unfortunately, I had to run HP Service Test in a mode where HP license servers were required and I had to set these systems up with IT which was a total pain. The version of HP Service Test (and if I remember correctly QTP as well) had to connect to a license server in order to run properly. We had these test heads with HPST/QTP in order to run Json/UI tests plus any java python tests stored in svn. For example: If the lic server went down, all the HPST nodes would fail their automation tests. Which would bring down the entire automated test infrastructure and people would think the current build was bad. If the lic server became over loaded, the ATI above would come down. If the network blocked the lic server port, then people could not share lic servers across large enterprise networks. We are talking HP here. We had 100’s of these “test heads” that would run automated tests against a particular version of a product running on a test node, for each new build candidate, 24 hours a day. We were trying to sell the rest of the group(s) on setting up their own test rings by using our test framework, and one of the big arguments was having to use HP Service Test and the hassle with lic server registration and set-up. Most of the groups would just try and point to my groups lic server(s). This was a few years ago mind you. Maybe things changed since then. I was on lone to the particular test group because I was a programmer and was very passionate about enterprise class automated test environments and technology. I worked with another guy which was a big advocate for QTP/HPST evangelical.
VS
Low code features and good customization but needs more customer-requested features
We utilized the solution to showcase our capabilities to customers or clients, and demonstrate how it can save money and achieve a return on investment through automation The organization was able to provide customers with business solutions by giving demos of various tools, assisting in securing…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TestingWhiz?
It is cheaper compared to other tools. The tool is web-based with various licenses, including professional and enterprise editions.
What needs improvement with TestingWhiz?
Some features need to be implemented based on customer customization requests, which are currently not available. Additionally, there is a need to improve the handling of less critical issues which...
What is your primary use case for TestingWhiz?
We utilized the solution to showcase our capabilities to customers or clients, and demonstrate how it can save money and achieve a return on investment through automation.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Service Test, HPE Service Test
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
Verizon, IBM, Symantec, VMware, Hyundai, Choice Hotels, Intel, Autodesk, Frost
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: December 2024.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.