We performed a comparison between Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Seqrite Antivirus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, ESET and others in Anti-Malware Tools."We have just started to implement it. It is useful for protection from malware and ransomware."
"Provides good security features and you can view it in the central console."
"It has Kusto Query Language (KQL), so we can use our own queries to find anything."
"The protection that it provides is quite good."
"It's absolutely free to use."
"Defender for Endpoint is a robust solution that works well out-of-the-box."
"The best feature is the fact that for certain mobiles you can control your corporate profiles versus your personal profiles. That is amazingly important. Apple just supported the separation of corporate and personal profiles, whereas Android has been doing that for quite some time... Because Android supports that, if an Android phone is lost or stolen, I can wipe out all the corporate-related information from that phone and not touch the personal side. I can separate the apps and I can separate the ability to cut and paste between apps."
"DFE organizational security posture has been a positive experience. We're a Microsoft house. It works. Once it's deployed and once it's configured, it works and our clients tend to be happy with it. I haven't really experienced anyone who has been so unsatisfied with the platform that they wanted to go a couple of different directions, that has never happened to me."
"Seqrite Antivirus is an easy-to-use solution."
"I'm not too sure of its current capabilities, but I'm pretty sure they are doing a good job on Windows and Mac. However, I'm not sure whether they covered Linux. If I remember correctly, Microsoft Defender didn't have anything proper on Linux back then, but if they have improved it from that aspect, it would already be ticking all the boxes."
"I would like MDE to have the ability to isolate a certain amount of time on the timeline."
"I am not sure if I will be using this product in the future because of the price."
"It would be helpful if they included XDR features, on top of the EDR functionality."
"I would like the solution to be able to prevent unauthorized programs from installing and to block unauthorised URLs which is similar to web filtering product."
"It would be helpful if they offered video tutorial guides."
"I would like to see better integration with their other security products to give better visibility from a higher level."
"The onboarding and deployment could be more user-friendly, and there is room to grow in some of the reports. I don't want them to be oversimplified or overly complex, but there is room for improvement in the reporting it can do. It's relatively minor."
"The solution needs improvement in stability."
More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is ranked 1st in Anti-Malware Tools with 182 reviews while Seqrite Antivirus is ranked 31st in Anti-Malware Tools with 1 review. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is rated 8.0, while Seqrite Antivirus is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint writes "Eliminates the need to look at multiple dashboards by automatically providing one XDR dashboard to show the security score of each subscription". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Seqrite Antivirus writes "An easy-to-use solution with responsive tech support but stability needs improvement ". Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is most compared with Symantec Endpoint Security, Intercept X Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Seqrite Antivirus is most compared with Quick Heal Total Security and CrowdStrike Falcon.
See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.
We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
