Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Parallel Data War...
Ranking in Data Warehouse
10th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions
Ranking in Data Warehouse
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
Database Development and Management (7th), Relational Databases Tools (9th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is 1.0%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 5.4%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Warehouse
 

Featured Reviews

DJ Kim - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 9, 2024
Enhances data management process with efficient integration capabilities
Our customers use Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse to manage large volumes of data and perform complex queries efficiently. Its performance is generally superior compared to other solutions, aiding in the efficient handling of large-scale data analytics projects The key features impacting our…
Erick  Karanja - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 11, 2024
Management interface is cool and offers good features like dead-lettering (DLXs) and more
I like many features in RabbitMQ. Number one, reliability for the messages is key. RabbitMQ ensures your messages are safe. They are not deleted and stuff. Number two, they have a very good feature called Retrying messages – it's all about retries. You can easily retry a message through RabbitMQ. So, if processing fails, you can push the message back into RabbitMQ. Maybe you can re-consume it and so on. They also have features like tags, which we call "dead-lettering (DLXs)." If it's approved, it means the messages have been delivered. If it's false or missing the first time you get it, you can make decisions based on that. The feature assigned to code for it is called the dead-letter queue. Moreover, the management interface is so cool. It's simple. It's able to give us an overview of the messages that have been consumed, pending messages, messages that have been delivered, messages that have been acknowledged, and so on. We can also extend that management to tools like... we can extend the management through, like, Kibana or Grafana

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It performs very well overall."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is performance."
"​It has allowed fast daily loads and analysis of millions of rows of data, which eventually moved to near real-time.​"
"The most valuable feature is the business intelligence (BI) part of it."
"It is a very stable database."
"The solution's integration is good."
"The most valuable features are the performance and usability."
"Data collection and reporting are valuable features of the solution."
"The product has been stable and I have never faced any kind of problems with it."
"The message routing is the most valuable feature. It is effective and flexible."
"With VMware Tanzu Greenplum, one can make a huge database table and analyze the queries by adding in the SQL command. Some hint or command for the query goes over the multi-parallel execution."
"It is easy to use. The addition of more queues and more services can be managed very easily."
"Companies can scale the solution, so long as they have server room."
"Helps us to achieve large-scale analytics."
"The solution has really cool features to use. Its management console is excellent. You can utilize plugins to view the performance of the whole service on one network."
"The most valuable feature for us is horizontal scaling."
 

Cons

"More tools to help designers should be included."
"We find the cost of the solution to be a little high."
"​Concurrent queries are limited to 32, making it more of a data storage mechanism instead of an active DWH solution."
"Some compatibility issues occur during deployment, so we need to build the product from scratch for some features."
"The product does not have all of the features that the native products have."
"This solution would be improved with an option for in-memory data analysis."
"The query is slow if we don't optimize it."
"We'd like to see it be a bit more compatible with other solutions."
"Implementation takes a long time."
"Their implementation is quite tricky. It's not that easy to implement RabbitMQ as a cluster."
"Other tools besides RabbitMQ provide good TPS and HA."
"The product needs to focus on offering more use case documentation because browsing the internet to find it can be a process filled with struggles."
"The initial setup is somewhat complex and the out-of-the-box configuration requires optimization."
"The availability could be better."
"The support feature could benefit from some improvement in terms of accessibility and responsiveness."
"If you're outside IP address range, the clustering no longer has all the features which is problematic."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Microsoft has an agreement with the government in our country, so our customers get their licensing costs from the Ministry. Whenever we work with any government, company, or government institute, which is mainly what we are doing, that license comes directly from the Ministry of Technology and Information."
"I think the program is well-priced compared to the other offerings that are out in the market."
"The solution's pricing is fairly decent for organizations with huge data sizes."
"The tool could be expensive if we need to manage a lot of data."
"The solution is cost-effective."
"All the features that we use do not require any additional subscription or yearly fees."
"They offer an annual subscription. The pricing depends on the size of the environments."
"Technical support is an additional fee and is expensive."
"It is the best product with best fit for price/performance customer objectives."
"The price is pretty good."
"The pricing is okay."
"The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."
"Pricing is good compared to other products. It's fine."
"The solution's pricing is cost-effective as it does not involve significant expenses. Licensing is required only for the server, while clients do not need any licensing. Therefore, it proves to be a cost-efficient option."
"We are using the open-source version of this solution."
"On a scale of one to five, with five being the most competitive pricing, I would rate this solution as a four."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
25%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Insurance Company
7%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
29%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse?
Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse provides good firewall processing in terms of response time.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse?
The solution is cost-effective, especially considering its seamless integration with Azure. However, the cost can be a challenge, particularly for customers who prefer on-premises solutions.
How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?
IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu Greenplum?
It’s an open-source solution. There are no expenses for using it.
 

Also Known As

Microsoft PDW, SQL Server Data Warehouse, Microsoft SQL Server Parallel Data Warehouse, MS Parallel Data Warehouse
Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Auckland Transport, Erste Bank Group, Urban Software Institute, NJVC, Sheraton Hotels and Resorts, Tata Steel Europe
General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.