Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services vs Oracle Business Intelligence Discoverer comparison

"Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS) is reliable for management dashboard and reporting purposes. It is helpful for user reporting and administrative tasks, such as monitoring progress. It is easy to use since it is lightweight and integrates well with the SQL Server database, making reporting straightforward. The visualization capabilities enhance our reporting needs with good pagination and KPI features. It integrates well with data servers and workbooks, allowing us to publish reports on mobile applications and tablets easily. Integrating other tools and platforms in our tech ecosystem is generally straightforward. However, if we need to perform something very specialized, we might have to use third-party tools rather than inbuilt options."

"We were able to embed the report builder within our internal proprietary systems, improving our reporting capabilities."

"I like Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services' automated reporting feature."

"I mainly use the solution for the ease of reporting and for executive dashboards."

"The SQL Server Reporting Services makes it very easy to get the data whenever we need it."

"The solution's features are all just wrapped up in one nice easy package. I don't need a lot of toolsets to get everything I need done."

"In Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services, the installation and configuration are easy."

"I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. It can work with different databases like Oracle."

"The tool's most valuable feature is table creation. One of the most important capabilities is the supplier assessment reports. These reports provide a balance during transactions, which is crucial for auditing."

"We have had issues with the refresh interval since we have too many reports scheduled. Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services is also expensive."

"The solution's interface is old."

"We encounter some barriers while trying to build a report."

"Sometimes, we need to make sure that the configuration stays consistent across the reporting instances. They all connect to the same database. So, it shares that same backend, but the reporting services itself can also be configured. On the application level, for reporting level. And it is, based on my own experience, it is a manual effort to make sure that the reporting servers are configured the same across the environment."

"The setup is difficult because you have to install different servers."

"The complex tuning for report performance is complicated. There is a lack of native support for source code control. We often need to use separate tools like VS Code or other software to manage version control and changes in the database. It would be beneficial if source code management were integrated directly into SSRS, thus eliminating the need to rely on external tools. While CLI-based operations are exemplary, the trend is towards GUI for a better user experience. Integrating both visualization and source code management within SSRS would simplify the process for users."

"It is not easy to integrate the product with other tools in the market."

"It would be really nice to have better integration between the solution and Power BI."

"Oracle Business Intelligence Discoverer needs to improve its performance and HTML reports."

"The tool's licensing costs are expensive."

"The product pricing is reasonable in terms of suitable features for business."

"The solution is cheaper than its alternatives."

"The solution is free to use for developers."

"The solution is expensive."

"Value-wise, the solution's pricing is good for the price that we pay."

"The price is pretty good."

"The pricing is high."

"Oracle Business Intelligence Discoverer is more expensive than its alternatives. You need to pay additional costs for implementation."