Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Virtual Server vs Numecent comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Virtual Server
Ranking in Application Virtualization
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Numecent
Ranking in Application Virtualization
5th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Application Virtualization category, the mindshare of Microsoft Virtual Server is 1.7%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Numecent is 12.7%, up from 9.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

ChimeremezeNwabueze - PeerSpot reviewer
Eliminates the need for physical hardware and is not platform dependent
You can detach and reuse the storage drive without disrupting the virtual server, which is quite useful. Additionally, it provides options like network security groups to protect virtual machines from unauthorized access. The tool offers compatibility with various operating systems through the Azure Marketplace. You can access a wide range of Windows operating systems, both enterprise and commercial.
it_user749919 - PeerSpot reviewer
Being able to deploy applications which use drivers has allowed us to virtualise more applications than with other solutions
Isolation layering Driver virtualisation Licence management Usage tracking Plugin integration Being able to deploy applications which use drivers has allowed us to virtualise more applications than with other solutions. Self-service Portal. More than eight years. No. No. No, it scales very…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The dashboard is valuable to us."
"The tool is perfectly stable."
"It is a scalable solution...I followed some online tutorials, because of which I did not face any technical issues or the need to contact the solution's technical support."
"The solution provides easy monitoring and easy troubleshooting."
"Microsoft Virtual Server is user-friendly."
"The most valuable features are monitoring, and the self-service that they have for a customized environment."
"The product helps us secure VMs from vulnerabilities in our systems like Sentinel. It indicates the threat via email notification."
"The performance and scalability offered by the tool meet our company's expectations."
"Driver virtualisation"
 

Cons

"The bandwidth to Singapore could be scaled better."
"The response time from technical support could be faster."
"Microsoft Virtual Server needs to improve its stability."
"The solution's user interface could be improved."
"The pricing and scalability are areas of the product with shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The interface should be improved."
"There could be more security features included in the product."
"They should introduce a way to localize the currency for product pricing."
"Self-service Portal."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Microsoft Virtual Server is a low-cost solution."
"The solution has a yearly license. If we switch to a yearly subscription plan for Microsoft Virtual Server, it would be cheaper in the long run. The price per month would be higher, but the overall cost for the year would be lower."
"It is an expensive product."
"There is no need for me to pay anything towards the solution's licensing costs."
"The tool's cost has been taken care of with the help of Microsoft Fabric and with a consolidated or unified interface, where the entire product serves as a SaaS offering for the user."
"Microsoft Virtual Server is an expensive solution."
"Compared to the other products in the market, I believe that the prices of Microsoft Virtual Server are on the higher side."
"The cost can also be optimized by changing the size of the implementation."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
33%
Energy/Utilities Company
13%
Computer Software Company
6%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Microsoft Virtual Server?
One feature I would like to see is better compatibility with macOS. Due to business policies, macOS isn't currently available in the Azure Marketplace. Microsoft should come to agreement with it.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Virtual Server, MS Virtual Server
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Paylocity, ASELSAN, Sochi Organizing Committee, Supervisor of Elections, Orange County, Florida, Netgem, Nav Canada, The British & Irish Lions
Kingston University London, Construction Executive, Ascentech K.K, Fast Company, Geekout365
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, Parallels and others in Application Virtualization. Updated: February 2025.
838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.