MySQL vs SQLite comparison

Read 8 SQLite reviews

1,669 Views
1,659 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

MySQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

SQLite and MySQL are both database solutions that compete in the category of relational database management systems. MySQL seems to have the upper hand due to its scalability and advanced features suited for complex applications, whereas SQLite is ideal for smaller, more lightweight needs.

Features: SQLite offers simplicity, a zero-configuration setup, and minimal resource usage, which makes it extremely useful for mobile apps, and small to medium-sized applications. MySQL is equipped with advanced features like high performance for handling complex queries, a variety of storage engines, and high concurrency support, making it perfect for large-scale applications.

Room for Improvement: SQLite could enhance its support for more complex multi-user environments and offer better scalability options. Strengthening data security features and increasing concurrency capacity would make it more attractive for larger applications. MySQL could improve its initial setup process to be more user-friendly for beginners, reduce its resource consumption in smaller environments, and simplify its licensing options to appeal to a broader user base.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SQLite offers an easy deployment process with no external dependencies, making it extremely quick to implement. MySQL, requiring a dedicated server and extra configuration, involves a more complex setup but offers comprehensive customer support options.

Pricing and ROI: SQLite, being open-source, involves no initial cost, providing excellent ROI for projects with limited budgets. MySQL, also open-source but with optional enterprise-level features, may entail additional costs, yet its advanced capabilities can deliver significant ROI for enterprises needing robust data solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed MySQL vs. SQLite Report (Updated: March 2025).

MySQL vs. SQLite

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MySQL

Ranking in Open Source Databases

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

148

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (3rd)

SQLite

Ranking in Open Source Databases

11th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Embedded Database (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of MySQL is 11.4%, down from 18.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SQLite is 4.4%, up from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

Muzzamil Hussain

Assistant Vice President at National Bank of Pakistan

Native encryption ensures secure data management with a simple deployment

The most valuable feature is the on-premises data encryption facilities. By default, we can provide encryption, and this feature in MySQL is why we prefer it over other databases. The native encryption in MySQL encourages us to use this database model more frequently compared to Oracle and other databases. With Oracle, we have to buy another solution for encryption and masking, but MySQL supports native encryption, which enhances our return on investment. It perfectly supports our ROI, and we have no issues with its functionality.

Read full review

Neeraj Tiwari

Student at Queens University Belfast

Pretty easy to execute my SQL queries but issues while uploading and importing my dataset

It was a bit easy to use compared to other tools. It's simple. I found it pretty easy to execute my SQL queries. Since I was a beginner, it was comfortable for me to learn SQL using SQLite. However, when I used it for my professional work and for my assignments, I found some complications. Maybe I'm not proficient with it, that's why. The main benefit for me was learning. Since I was new to SQL, SQLite helped me understand how to work with structured data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The IO segregation in CGE is valuable."

"While MySQL offers strong basic functionality."

"The solution has been very easy to scale so far."

"It creates a unified view of the entire architecture and performance factor, helping to manage the network more easily."

"For sure, the solution is very stable."

"I like MySQL because of its community."

"The solution helps us perform with our databases and extract data."

"The main advantage is the very large user base. This enables users to fix about any issue by answering any question."

More MySQL pros

"I haven't encountered any problems in my use cases. So, it has been a stable product for me."

"Sometimes, you want data to persist within the app even when there's no internet connectivity. To avoid showing blank screens, we can use SQLite to store data locally and then sync it with the cloud database when connectivity is restored."

"I use Flutter Technology with the JSF plugin."

"The product is lightweight and highly scalable."

"It was a bit easy to use compared to other tools. It's simple. I found it pretty easy to execute my SQL queries."

"SQLite’s most valuable feature is the ability to store granular-level backups of databases."

Cons

"The workbench could be improved. In particular, error messages can be improved, which are horrific and completely unhelpful. I'd like to see improved parsing of errors. When you write SQL and it crashes, it usually is something completely irrelevant and not helpful. I've started to use GPT 3.5 for finding out how to do things. I got to do something a bit different, and that I found to be very useful. If there was some way to tie it into one of the new AI tools, that would probably be a good idea."

"If it had something similar to Microsoft’s DTS engine then it would be the best database system out there."

"MySQL's performance needs to be improved for enterprise-level applications compared to Oracle and Postgres."

"It could be a little bit simpler to use."

"The analytics features are in need of improvement."

"It is not as powerful as SQL Server. It can be more powerful. It is not scalable and has certain limitations, which is not the case with SQL Server."

"Could use some additional JSON query support in the solution."

"The licensing of the solution is on the expensive side."

More MySQL cons

"It could have a user-friendly GUI and better intelligence features."

"I primarily use SQLite for small-scale applications due to its limitations in storing large amounts of data. For larger-scale projects, I typically opt for MySQL or other alternatives. Storing a large number of dates in SQLite can significantly impact its performance."

"A potential drawback is that the database file stored within the application's local storage could be accessible to users."

"Compared to other tools, the performance was less effective than that of Microsoft Access."

"There are some difficulties on the server side. When syncing data with databases like SQL Server or Oracle, SQLite requires a kind of double effort."

"The performance could be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product has a good price point."

"There is no licensing fee."

"For the on-premise version, no license is required."

"The pricing falls within the moderate range."

"We are using the free community edition of MySQL."

"It is an open source platform."

"MySQL is cheaper than Microsoft SQL Server."

"Microsoft licensing for SQL Server is probably ten times more expensive. I used to work for the government, and I remember when we were looking into upgrading to the enterprise version of SQL Server 2019, the licensing was going to cost 350,000. To get the equivalent in the cloud, it was going to be about four grand to get the same processing power and everything else. With MySQL, it was going to be about 300 for the same licensing. Cost-wise, for sure, there is a huge difference. Would you prefer to pay 300 a month or 3,000 to have the same amount of data resources? You might lose a few options that you need, but it isn't worth the price difference."

More MySQL pricing and cost advice

"It's not expensive."

"It's a good value."

"The tool is open-source."

"I rate the product’s pricing a six out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?

MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...

Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?

I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...

What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?

One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...

What do you like most about SQLite?

It was a bit easy to use compared to other tools. It's simple. I found it pretty easy to execute my SQL queries.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SQLite?

It is not expensive.

What needs improvement with SQLite?

There were some complications. For example, you have to upload the dataset into SQLite, and once it's uploaded, you might find difficulties working with it.

Oracle Berkeley DB vs SQLite

Comparisons

Firebird SQL vs MySQL

Compared 28% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MySQL

Compared 16% of the time

SAP HANA vs MySQL

Compared 8% of the time

MariaDB vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

CockroachDB vs MySQL

Compared 2% of the time

More MySQL Competitors

Firebird SQL vs SQLite

Compared 48% of the time

DuckDB vs SQLite

Compared 8% of the time

LanceDB vs SQLite

Compared 8% of the time

MariaDB vs SQLite

Compared 6% of the time

Compared 6% of the time

More SQLite Competitors

Product Reports

MySQL

Download MySQL product report

Download SQLite product report

Overview

MySQL is a cost-efficient and scalable relational database management system widely used in web, mobile applications, and academic projects.

MySQL is utilized for backend operations, data analysis, reporting, financial transactions, and ERP databases. It supports deployment on local servers, Cloud, and Kubernetes. Its free, open-source nature along with strong community support make it popular among companies. MySQL's compatibility with multiple platforms and programming languages enhances its appeal. While it remains stable and easy to use, areas such as replication, clustering, and backup require improvement to better serve enterprise applications. Enhanced security, error messages, and monitoring tools are also desired for a better user experience.

What are the most important features of MySQL?

Free and Open-Source: No licensing costs, perfect for budget-conscious projects.
Compatibility: Works with multiple platforms and programming languages.
High Performance: Efficient performance across large datasets.
Scalability: Easily scales to meet growing business needs.
Clustering and Replication: Ensures data availability and redundancy.
Easy Installation: Quick setup process on various operating systems.
Community Support: Extensive resources and community assistance.
Cross-Platform: Operates seamlessly on different operating systems.
Data Management Interface: Simplifies data handling and manipulation.

What are the benefits of using MySQL?

Cost Efficiency: Reduce expenses with a free, open-source database.
Scalability: Adapt to increasing data demands effortlessly.
Performance: Handle large datasets with ease and speed.
Community Support: Access a vast pool of knowledge and resources.
Flexibility: Integrate with various platforms and languages for diverse use cases.
Data Reliability: Clustering and replication for high data availability.

In multiple industries, MySQL supports internal applications, billing systems, academic teaching purposes, and ERP databases. Companies leverage MySQL for Cloud and local deployments, ensuring effective data manipulation and backend operations in diverse projects. Its role in financial transactions and reporting further emphasizes its versatility.

Oracle

SQLite is an open-source, serverless, reliable, and flexible, SQL database engine. It is particularly favored in the realm of embedded database solutions and small to medium-sized projects. Unlike traditional database systems that operate on a client-server model, SQLite is a serverless database engine, meaning it runs directly within the application it powers. This unique architecture makes SQLite an ideal choice for applications where simplicity, efficiency, and minimal configuration are paramount.

SQLite is an embedded database engine, which means it operates directly within the application that uses it, without requiring a separate server process. It is designed to be cross-platform, supporting multiple operating systems, and is is compatible with a wide range of programming languages, such as C, C++, Python, Java, and more. This makes it highly portable and suitable for a wide range of applications, from mobile devices to desktop software and web applications.

The key advantages of SQLite is its reliability, the lightweight nature and efficient performance. It has a small footprint, typically requiring only a few megabytes of disk space, and can operate entirely in memory if needed. It is designed to be reliable and robust, with built-in features such as atomic commit and rollback, which ensure data integrity even in the event of system crashes or power failures. Finally, the SQLite solution requires no configuration or setup, making it easy to use and deploy. It can be embedded directly into applications without the need for complex installation or configuration procedures.

SQLite Functionality

SQL Compliance: SQLite supports a substantial portion of the SQL standard, including features like transactions, triggers, views, and indexes.
File-based Storage: SQLite stores its entire database as a single cross-platform file on the host machine's file system.
ACID Compliance: SQLite fully supports ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) transactions, ensuring data consistency and integrity in concurrent access scenarios.

SQLite is an open-source project distributed under a public domain license, which means it can be used, modified, and distributed freely, without any licensing costs or restrictions.

To summarize, SQLite is widely used in various applications, including web browsers (e.g., Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome), mobile applications (e.g., Android, iOS), embedded systems, and desktop software. Its simplicity, portability, and efficiency make it a popular choice for developers who require a lightweight and reliable database solution, especially in resource-constrained environments or applications with modest data storage needs.

Sample Customers

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.

Oracle, Bloomberg, Bentley, Mozilla

MySQL vs. SQLite