Neo4j Graph Database vs Oracle NoSQL comparison

Neo4j and Oracle are both solutions in the NoSQL Databases category. Neo4j is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.0, while Oracle is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7. Neo4j holds a 4.0% mindshare in ND, compared to Oracle’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Neo4j users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Neo4j Graph Database

Read 5 Neo4j Graph Database reviews

757 Views
548 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle NoSQL

Read 8 Oracle NoSQL reviews

708 Views
621 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Neo4j Graph Database

Oracle NoSQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

Oracle NoSQL and Neo4j Graph Database are competing data management solutions, with each catering to different use cases. Oracle NoSQL shines in handling scalable key-value data, but Neo4j Graph Database offers unique insights through its graph-based model, appealing for businesses focusing on data relationships.

Features: Oracle NoSQL provides automatic data partitioning, flexible data models, and strong security measures, optimal for high-throughput transactions. Neo4j Graph Database is powerful for graph-based querying and visualization, revealing hidden data patterns suited for complex relationship data.

Room for Improvement: Oracle NoSQL could improve in ease of deployment and enhancing support for graph-based queries. Simplifying initial setup and providing richer querying features might broaden its appeal. Neo4j could enhance transaction capabilities to match those of traditional databases, improve integration with other data systems, and offer more cost-effective solutions for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Neo4j stands out for its straightforward deployment, comprehensive documentation, and responsive support, making it accessible for organizations looking for relationship-based solutions. Oracle NoSQL's distributed architecture can complicate deployment, but it benefits from strong service and enterprise-level support.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle NoSQL offers a cost-effective option for large-scale data needs, supported by competitive pricing and favorable ROI. Neo4j, despite higher initial costs, provides significant return through advanced data relationship insights, justifying the investment for businesses prioritizing complex data interactions.

To learn more, read our detailed Neo4j Graph Database vs. Oracle NoSQL Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Neo4j Graph Database vs. Oracle NoSQL

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Neo4j Graph Database

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle NoSQL

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Neo4j Graph Database is 4.0%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle NoSQL is 3.5%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Azharuddin Mohammed

Full-stack Developer at ImageVision.ai

A flexible database with good documentation

If someone asks me whether to use Neo4j Graph Database, I'd want to know what they're building. I'd recommend it based on their use case. If it meets their needs, I'd suggest it. I recommend starting with the tool even for those exploring graph databases. It's been around since about 2010 and is better than other graph databases in many ways. Learning the tool depends on the programming language you're using. We had some challenges with Golang due to limited library support. However, Neo4j is easier to use with Node.js, JavaScript, or Python. Overall, I'd rate the tool eight to nine out of ten. It offers great features, scalability, and flexibility and has good documentation. It's easy to learn. However, every database has pros and cons, so the rating might change when comparing it to other graph databases.

Read full review

GLEDSONCOOPER

Infrastructure specialist at Cooper Cloud

The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes

NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"As a graph database, I am surprised at their performance and response time."

"For now, the tool doesn't break down or stop, so it is quite stable."

"The solution's best feature is how it differs from traditional SQL databases. It's hard to map people and find those near me in SQL, which requires long, complex queries. Neo4j Graph Database makes this easier with simpler queries. It also supports more data types, like JSON, which SQL doesn't."

"Creates the ability to visualize outputs."

"Enables people to understand what the business problem is and how the technology helps."

"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability."

"The tool performs well."

"NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go."

"We have a support agreement with Oracle, ensuring full support for the product. It is crucial for our public-facing features. Oracle NoSQL is easy to manage and has fast data retrieval. Its compatibility with Oracle Database is seamless, making integration between NoSQL and relational databases smooth and effortless. Oracle NoSQL and NoSQL data replication in our environment works efficiently. Oracle fully supports it, and we can easily configure and manage authentication for the NoSQL database."

"The tool is easy to learn."

Cons

"There are concerns about performance and whether the tool can necessarily scale to provide the solution."

"So far, we have not had any issues and are happy with the product in general."

"The tool could improve by having more resources, especially for Golang, which we use. It lacks good basic libraries and doesn't have an ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) tool, which many NoSQL databases have. We thought about building an ORM for the Neo4j Graph Database but are too busy."

"For me, when the tool was deployed on an on-premises model, it was a little bit difficult the first time."

"The installation is difficult."

"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."

"The licensing model is bad."

"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options."

"Focusing on making the administration easier compared to other solutions like MongoDB could be beneficial. Simplifying the administrative tasks could enhance the user experience."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is open source so that you can use it for free. They also offer an enterprise version with its billing. If your company is earning well, I suggest using the enterprise version. Otherwise, you can deploy it on your own cloud and pay based on usage."

"The tool is not expensive."

"The product is expensive and Oracle could work to lower the licensing cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Legal Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Neo4j?

The solution is open source so that you can use it for free. They also offer an enterprise version with its billing. If your company is earning well, I suggest using the enterprise version. Otherwi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Neo4j Graph Database?

The tool could improve by having more resources, especially for Golang, which we use. It lacks good basic libraries and doesn't have an ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) tool, which many NoSQL databa...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Neo4j Graph Database?

We're building a social media platform, which is a great use case for the product. It helps connect people. For example, if we're friends on Facebook, I can get suggestions for people near me or re...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle NoSQL?

The tool is easy to learn.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle NoSQL?

If the use cases change, the cost could be reduced.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle NoSQL?

Focusing on making the administration easier compared to other solutions like MongoDB could be beneficial. Simplifying the administrative tasks could enhance the user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

MongoDB vs Neo4j Graph Database

Compared 17% of the time

SingleStore vs Neo4j Graph Database

Compared 13% of the time

SQL Server vs Neo4j Graph Database

Compared 11% of the time

Aerospike Database 7 vs Neo4j Graph Database

Compared 11% of the time

ScyllaDB vs Neo4j Graph Database

Compared 10% of the time

More Neo4j Graph Database Competitors

MongoDB vs Oracle NoSQL

Compared 47% of the time

Cassandra vs Oracle NoSQL

Compared 30% of the time

ScyllaDB vs Oracle NoSQL

Compared 14% of the time

InfluxDB vs Oracle NoSQL

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle NoSQL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Neo4j Graph Database

January 2025

Download Neo4j Graph Database product report

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

January 2025

Download Oracle NoSQL product report

Learn More

Neo4j

Oracle

Overview

Neo4j is the graph database solution allowing the analysis of complex relationships and patterns in data, leading to better decision-making and improved business processes. The graph database offers easy data integration from multiple sources, providing a more comprehensive view.

The most valuable aspect of a graph database is its performance and response time, as it does not use the join function and only has nodes and raw data. Overall, Neo4j, as a global first-ranking solution, has helped organizations become more efficient and effective in data analysis and decision-making processes.

The Oracle NoSQL Database (ONDB) provides network-accessible multiterabyte distributed key/value pair storage with predictable latency. Data is stored in a very flexible key-value format, where the key consists of the combination of a major and minor key (represented as a string) and an associated value (represented as a JSON data format or opaque set of bytes). It offers full Create, Read, Update and Delete (CRUD) operations, with adjustable durability and consistency guarantees. It also provides powerful and flexible transactional model that eases the application development.

The Oracle NoSQL Database is designed to be a highly available and extremely scalable system, with predictable levels of throughput and latency, while requiring minimal administrative interaction.

For more information on Oracle NoSQL Database, visit Oracle.com

Sample Customers

Walmart, Telenor, Wazoku, Adidas, Cerved, GameSys, eBay, Schleich, ICIJ, die Bayerisch, Megree, InfoJobs, LinkedIn

Airbus, Globacom, WebAction

Buyer's Guide

Neo4j Graph Database vs. Oracle NoSQL

January 2025

Free Report: Neo4j Graph Database vs. Oracle NoSQL

Find out what your peers are saying about Neo4j Graph Database vs. Oracle NoSQL and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Neo4j Graph Database vs. Oracle NoSQL report.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.