Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NetApp StorageGRID vs Quantum ActiveScale comparison

NetApp and Quantum are both solutions in the File and Object Storage category. NetApp is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2, while Quantum is ranked #22. NetApp holds a 5.2% mindshare in FaOS, compared to Quantum’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quantum users who would recommend it.
NetApp StorageGRID
Read 13 NetApp StorageGRID reviews
  • 3,269 Views
  • 2,604 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
Quantum ActiveScale
Read 2 Quantum ActiveScale reviews
  • 424 Views
  • 323 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

NetApp StorageGRID and Quantum ActiveScale compete in the object storage solutions category. Quantum ActiveScale has the upper hand due to its advanced features, making it appealing despite its higher costs.

Features: NetApp StorageGRID focuses on robust data management, scalability, and pricing, appealing to enterprises seeking reliable solutions. Quantum ActiveScale provides advanced data protection, performance optimization, and superior security, making it preferred for data-intensive environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetApp StorageGRID is known for its straightforward deployment and strong customer service, facilitating easier infrastructure integration. Quantum ActiveScale offers robust customer support but presents a more complex deployment process due to its advanced capabilities, potentially posing initial challenges.

Pricing and ROI: NetApp StorageGRID is recognized for competitive setup costs, offering better ROI for budget-conscious enterprises. Quantum ActiveScale requires a higher initial investment but justifies it with enhanced performance and features, appealing to organizations where advanced capabilities outweigh setup costs.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed NetApp StorageGRID vs. Quantum ActiveScale Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
NetApp StorageGRID vs. Quantum ActiveScale
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
NetApp StorageGRID offers seamless scalability and integration for enterprises, efficiently handling large data volumes with flexible model options.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.5
NetApp StorageGRID offers efficient storage solutions with fast recovery, easy manageability, enhanced security, and improved data retention and durability.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.4
NetApp StorageGRID's interface and integration are challenging, with high costs and complex configuration, needing efficiency and competitive improvements.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.9
NetApp StorageGRID is highly stable and reliable, with minimal failures, effective support, and consistent data availability, satisfying users.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
NetApp StorageGRID support is efficient with minor gaps, while some users find Hitachi support superior in expertise occasionally.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
NetApp StorageGRID offers flexible, enterprise-level storage with high initial costs but long-term savings, ideal for large-scale environments.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

NetApp StorageGRID
Ranking in File and Object Storage
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Quantum ActiveScale
Ranking in File and Object Storage
22nd
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the File and Object Storage category, the mindshare of NetApp StorageGRID is 5.2%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quantum ActiveScale is 0.5%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
File and Object Storage
 

Featured Reviews

Werner Broekhuizen - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides seamless data integration and has a reliable technical support team
The platform is highly scalable, allowing easy addition of enclosures and drives, making it non-disruptive and straightforward to expand as needed. It was originally hardware-agnostic, and its integration into NetApp has maintained this scalable nature, allowing for growth without compromising existing infrastructure. Its scalability is around an eight out of ten. It can handle large-scale and unstructured data needs. Its ability to manage significant volumes of data effectively makes it suitable for enterprises requiring robust storage solutions.
Read full review
FL
Good performance and reliable but the setup is complex
We would like to see a self-sufficient installation. Nowadays it's open-source, but the installation is still tied to the vendor, which means it is unlikely that it is going to scale. I want them to tap into the broader community. It is really emerging, they have a year over year, 50% annual growth. With a 10-year-old company, it will certainly bring a lot of interest, and will certainly make it more successful, if they tap into that growing customer base. They have to make themselves relevant to the industry. The industry is totally geared to the Cloud, DevOps, and geared for agility. The software with the appliance in my set is already outdated, and it is not that it cannot sell, but it has to be tapping into the emerging and growing sectors to continue with the customers and businesses. This is what the requirement is, to improve their technology. Which means that they have to make themselves relevant to the industry.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Manufacturing Company
20%
Computer Software Company
17%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Educational Organization
12%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NetApp StorageGRID?
The management portals have most significantly improved our data retrieval times. They've made it much easier to restore data compared to our previous methods.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp StorageGRID?
I rate the product pricing around five out of ten—it's negotiable, depending on the circumstances.
See all answers
What needs improvement with NetApp StorageGRID?
The product's continual innovation and enhancement in integration capabilities with other NetApp solutions could be better.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Dell ECS vs NetApp StorageGRID Logo
Dell ECS vs NetApp StorageGRID
Compared 25% of the time
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp StorageGRID Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp StorageGRID
Compared 24% of the time
MinIO vs NetApp StorageGRID Logo
MinIO vs NetApp StorageGRID
Compared 24% of the time
Scality RING vs NetApp StorageGRID Logo
Scality RING vs NetApp StorageGRID
Compared 7% of the time
Cloudian HyperStore vs NetApp StorageGRID Logo
Cloudian HyperStore vs NetApp StorageGRID
Compared 5% of the time
More NetApp StorageGRID Competitors
Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Quantum ActiveScale Logo
Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Quantum ActiveScale
Compared 33% of the time
Qumulo vs Quantum ActiveScale Logo
Qumulo vs Quantum ActiveScale
Compared 29% of the time
Dell ECS vs Quantum ActiveScale Logo
Dell ECS vs Quantum ActiveScale
Compared 22% of the time
MinIO vs Quantum ActiveScale Logo
MinIO vs Quantum ActiveScale
Compared 16% of the time
More Quantum ActiveScale Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
NetApp StorageGRID
November 2024
NetApp StorageGRID reportDownload NetApp StorageGRID product report
Buyer's Guide
File and Object Storage
October 2024
Quantum ActiveScale reportDownload Quantum ActiveScale product report
 

Also Known As

Storage GRID
ActiveScale, Quantum ActiveScale Object Storage, ActiveScale Object Storage
 

Learn More

NetApp
Quantum
 

Overview

Store and manage unstructured data at scale using NetApp StorageGRID for secure, durable object storage. Place content in the right location, at the right time, and on the right storage tier, optimizing workflows and reducing overall costs for globally distributed rich media. 

StorNext File System
Increase productivity and reduce time to critical business insights with StorNext® File System. StorNext architecture delivers the necessary performance to get your business moving forward.

 

Sample Customers

ASE, DARZ GmbH
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
NetApp StorageGRID vs. Quantum ActiveScale
October 2024
Free Report: NetApp StorageGRID vs. Quantum ActiveScale
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp StorageGRID vs. Quantum ActiveScale and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our NetApp StorageGRID vs. Quantum ActiveScale report.
See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.