Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services vs Rapid7 Penetration Testing Services comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Offensive Security Penetrat...
Ranking in Penetration Testing Services
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Rapid7 Penetration Testing ...
Ranking in Penetration Testing Services
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Penetration Testing Services category, the mindshare of Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services is 2.0%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 Penetration Testing Services is 4.5%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Penetration Testing Services
 

Featured Reviews

Gabriel Woolverton - PeerSpot reviewer
Open source and easy to set up
Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services has a rating system for how exploitable vulnerability is, but that rating system does not really give you any transparency into how the rating for that exploit was reached. It would be useful to see on the back end what data led them to specify that a specific exploit may not be very good or may be great. If we had some data correlated with that, we could see why it is that this one should be successful versus another.
Gabriel Woolverton - PeerSpot reviewer
Wide range of coverage and free
A useful improvement would be to have white papers for specific vulnerabilities readily available. It seems like they are not always linked when you are looking for a vulnerability identifier in the database. It would be useful to ensure that that information is readily available. That way, if you need to dive deeper into a vulnerability, you would have the capability to do so basically right there on the website.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services is open source, so it is free and there are no licensing costs."
"The initial setup is very straightforward. This is not a tool that you have to set up yourself. All you have to do is just access their web-based vulnerability database application, which is open source and available to pretty much anyone."
 

Cons

"Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services has a rating system for how exploitable vulnerability is, but that rating system does not really give you any transparency into how the rating for that exploit was reached. It would be useful to see on the back end what data led them to specify that a specific exploit may not be very good or may be great."
"A useful improvement would be to have white papers for specific vulnerabilities readily available. It seems like they are not always linked when you are looking for a vulnerability identifier in the database."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Penetration Testing Services solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
14%
University
11%
Construction Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Amazon, IBM, Oracle, U.S. Department of Defense, Deloitte, Salesforce
Motorola, Liberty wines, Kaman Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, HackerOne, Veracode and others in Penetration Testing Services. Updated: November 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.