OpenText ALM / Quality Center and OpenText ALM Octane both compete in the application lifecycle management category. OpenText ALM Octane may have the upper hand due to its modern architecture and enhanced support for Agile and DevOps environments.
Features: OpenText ALM / Quality Center offers extensive customization and integration capabilities. It provides unlimited storage for testing artifacts, enabling advanced traceability across testing stages. OpenText ALM Octane excels with Agile and DevOps support, robust CI/CD pipeline integration, and enhanced reporting features, making it adaptable across various methodologies.
Room for Improvement: OpenText ALM / Quality Center users report high licensing costs, complex project tracking, and a dated UI, along with limited browser compatibility. Improvements in traceability and reporting are necessary. OpenText ALM Octane needs better integration, native migration features, and enhanced reporting tools, with a more favorable pricing model.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer on-premises, cloud, and hybrid deployment options. OpenText ALM / Quality Center customer service is responsive but can be slow, while OpenText ALM Octane is noted for its quick technical support, benefiting from its modern architecture and cloud integrations.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText ALM / Quality Center is seen as costly, with high licensing and maintenance costs, justified by its features and integrations for large enterprises. OpenText ALM Octane is also costly, but its Agile and DevOps integration features justify the investment, demonstrating good ROI by enhancing test management efficiency.
The ability to generate audit evidence with a single click saves ten days of work for ten people, enabling them to focus on other tasks.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
We can expand the number of servers and resources as required.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet specific organizational needs.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
I see a stable tool that remains relevant in the market.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
Its ability to generate audit evidence with a single click is a significant advantage, as it saves considerable time and money compared to manual processes.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
OpenText ALM Octane helps organizations implement a “quality everywhere” approach and improve Agile and DevOps development and testing processes to improve the flow of work across the software delivery value stream. You can tightly align quality efforts from development to release, employ a broad range of tests anchored by automation, and continuously monitor and improve for increased throughput. OpenText fosters an open approach so that quality is visible, traceable, and continuously improved. By synchronizing quality and testing with Agile and DevOps processes, risks are mitigated early in the software delivery value stream – speeding the way for faster delivery and improved customer satisfaction.
ALM Octane facilitates a tailored and scalable approach for large enterprises. You can deploy your way and minimize infrastructure needs with deployment options spanning on-premises, SaaS, and public cloud (Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure Marketplaces). Similarly, various licensing options can tailor the features to meet specific needs with support for thousands of concurrent users in geographically disperse locations.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.