OpenText ALM/Quality Center and OpenText ALM Octane compete in the application lifecycle management category. OpenText ALM Octane seems to have the upper hand due to its flexibility and user-friendly interface, particularly appealing to agile environments.
Features: OpenText ALM/Quality Center offers robustness in data handling, comprehensive test management, and high customizability, making it a reliable choice for larger organizations. It integrates well with various tools and maintains strong traceability capabilities. OpenText ALM Octane is known for its adaptability, CI/CD integration, and a user-friendly interface beneficial for agile settings.
Room for Improvement: OpenText ALM/Quality Center could improve its high licensing costs, complex user experience, and outdated browser compatibility. It also needs more agile-friendly features. OpenText ALM Octane faces challenges with its pricing and could enhance its requirement and reporting features to align with modern testing needs better.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText ALM/Quality Center supports various deployment options, including on-premises, private cloud, and public cloud, offering comprehensive support but with a potential for complexity. Its customer service is satisfactory but occasionally slow. OpenText ALM Octane, typically deployed on-premises and private cloud, is noted for rapid deployment, though support quality can vary with issue complexity.
Pricing and ROI: Both OpenText ALM/Quality Center and OpenText ALM Octane are high-priced solutions. While users of ALM/Quality Center find cost to be a barrier, ALM Octane’s pricing is slightly more justified considering its feature range. These tools deliver measurable ROI through improved project tracking and time savings, despite cost efficiency concerns compared to competitors.
The ability to generate audit evidence with a single click saves ten days of work for ten people, enabling them to focus on other tasks.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
We can expand the number of servers and resources as required.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet specific organizational needs.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
I see a stable tool that remains relevant in the market.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
Its ability to generate audit evidence with a single click is a significant advantage, as it saves considerable time and money compared to manual processes.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
OpenText ALM Octane helps organizations implement a “quality everywhere” approach and improve Agile and DevOps development and testing processes to improve the flow of work across the software delivery value stream. You can tightly align quality efforts from development to release, employ a broad range of tests anchored by automation, and continuously monitor and improve for increased throughput. OpenText fosters an open approach so that quality is visible, traceable, and continuously improved. By synchronizing quality and testing with Agile and DevOps processes, risks are mitigated early in the software delivery value stream – speeding the way for faster delivery and improved customer satisfaction.
ALM Octane facilitates a tailored and scalable approach for large enterprises. You can deploy your way and minimize infrastructure needs with deployment options spanning on-premises, SaaS, and public cloud (Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure Marketplaces). Similarly, various licensing options can tailor the features to meet specific needs with support for thousands of concurrent users in geographically disperse locations.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.