OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs ReadyAPI Performance comparison

OpenText and SmartBear are both solutions in the Load Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.9, while SmartBear is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.5. OpenText holds a 8.6% mindshare in LTT, compared to SmartBear’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Read 42 OpenText LoadRunner Cloud reviews

2,992 Views
1,747 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

ReadyAPI Performance

Read 8 ReadyAPI Performance reviews

287 Views
190 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

ReadyAPI Performance

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud and ReadyAPI Performance are major contenders in the performance testing and API testing markets. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud appears to have the advantage in scalability, supporting up to 1 million users, while ReadyAPI is favored for its robust API testing capabilities and ease of integration.

Features: OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is designed for agile environments, offering automation ease, real-time anomaly detection, and extensive protocol support. It integrates seamlessly with monitoring tools, providing scalability for up to 1 million users. ReadyAPI Performance is notable for its focus on API quality through automated functional and performance tests. It offers detailed TPS and DPS reports, integrates well with other tools, and provides straightforward script handling.

Room for Improvement: OpenText LoadRunner Cloud needs better support for varied user load patterns and improved network latency simulation. There's also a demand for more customizable reporting and backward compatibility with older scripts. ReadyAPI Performance has room to enhance client-side scripting and streamline installation processes on Unix/Linux systems. Both tools could improve report generation, but LoadRunner Cloud's custom load pattern limitations are frequently highlighted by users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText LoadRunner Cloud supports multiple deployment models, including hybrid, and receives commendable customer service feedback. However, technical support is noted to have specific improvement areas. ReadyAPI Performance offers on-premises and public cloud deployment options and garners positive reviews for both deployment ease and technical support. ReadyAPI's support is regarded as more consistent and streamlined compared to LoadRunner's.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText LoadRunner Cloud employs a flexible pay-as-you-go model, albeit considered expensive by some compared to tools like NeoLoad. Its comprehensive protocol support justifies the cost for certain users. ReadyAPI Performance is affordably priced, with the pro version cheaper than LoadRunner, and praised for delivering good value. While both solutions display potential for ROI, LoadRunner's pricing is a common user concern.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. ReadyAPI Performance Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. ReadyAPI Performance

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

6th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ReadyAPI Performance

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

10th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is 8.6%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Performance is 1.3%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

AlexLogan

Senior Manager, Performance Engineering at Enel Group

Has realistic scenario composition for performance tests and is highly scalable, but the user interface needs improvement

The solution generates traffic on the infrastructure, which resembles end users. Depending on the performance of the underlying infrastructure and nodes of the architecture, our company team can report on the scalability of applications. The solution performs two types of tests: user interface testing, which is implemented primarily in our organization for online banking, and the other one is API level testing for mobile banking. In terms of the feature set, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is a market-leading application that has been around for 20 years. I have been working with the solution throughout the acquisition stages; the product used to be much better when it was primarily managed by Mercury. There are limited AI capabilities in the solution; when I was personally operating some smart scenarios using the feature of auto-scaling, I found it unsatisfying. I would recommend the product to others based on its feature set and the level of support. I would rate OpenText LoadRunner Cloud as seven out of ten. There are no glaring weaknesses in the product, and it's good enough for its core purpose.

Read full review

Mahendra Andhale

Test Architect at Happiest Minds Technologies

Open-source and flexible but needs client-side scripting

It's an open-source tool and supports a lot of plugins and custom code, which allows integration with other tools like Azure and AWS. Also, the APIs tested with SoapUI can be directly used, avoiding the need to create collections like in Postman. The client-side scripting, if incorporated, would provide a complete solution for performance tests. It can handle user distribution and transaction throughput distribution effectively.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The usability and ability to integrate with other solutions is quite good. When I use it in on Azure, then Red Hat is the most likely solution I use. When I use AWS, then I tend to use Lambda functions. In either case, it works well and you can use it either way."

"Keeping up with DevOps, thus the best feature of StormRunner is that we don't have to build and maintain infrastructure anymore."

"The product supports a wide variety of technology compared to any other tool."

"The record and playback feature is the most valuable feature. It's all driven by the script, so it's a script-based tool where the background tracing starts. Java's background process does a lot of tracing. The process starts in the background. It sees what peaks of volumes that the process can handle. It's easy to use because it's script based, record, and playback. I"

"It is feature-rich. It supports most protocols, which is important because I am in charge of a team at the bank, and we do performance testing for all kinds of different applications. We have tons of them. We even do video streams."

"Both the professional and cloud versions of Micro Focus LoadRunner use the same scripting or programming to execute performance modeling operations. This feature allows users to use various programming languages such as Java, C, or C++, which can run within either of the two environments. This flexibility in the programming language is a strong point of the software."

"This solution is SaaS based so we can utilize cloud technology, which is less time consuming and saves a lot of of money."

"The solution can scale."

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pros

"We can scale."

"It's like a centralized interface that allows us to increase the quality of our APIs."

"The performance and reporting of this solution have been its most valuable features."

"It's an open-source tool and supports a lot of plugins and custom code, which allows integration with other tools like Azure and AWS."

"It stores good reports, as in, improved reports if compared with the SoapUI. It also has in-built security. You just need to switch and check the security testing. My team has never used it, but I know ReadyAPI provides those facilities as well."

"ReadyAPI automation can help us validate the functionality of most web services, allowing us to find out the exact number of defects before deployment to the user interface."

"We find the product to be scalable."

"he initial deployment process is easy."

Cons

"I'd like to see more ability to dive more deeply into the configuration."

"Sometimes, you are utilizing one of the low generators, then all of a sudden if you discontinue from one project, it actually deletes the entire low generator."

"There are three modules in the system that are different products packaged into one, and they can sometimes be difficult to figure out, so they should be better integrated with each other."

"It doesn't provide custom reports. You can only use the default reports which contain irrelevant data or is missing data that we need."

"CI/CD integration could be a little bit better. When there's a test and if you see that there are high response times in the test itself, it would be great to be able to send an alert. It would give a heads-up to the architect community or ops community."

"An area for improvement is analytics on why response times are slow from certain countries."

"We are trying to put it into a complete CI/CD pipeline, but there are still some challenges when you try to run it through different protocols. The challenges are around how you can containerize applications. There are some limitations to some protocols, such as desktop. And when it comes to database testing, there are some things that we can't do through CI/CD."

"Some improvements can be made to the solution's user interface"

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud cons

"The client-side scripting mostly isn't needed for performance testing, however, if implemented, it would enhance the tool."

"It is very slow sometimes."

"The solution’s interface could be improved."

"This solution could be improved by offering artificial AI testing in addition to API testing. For example, we would like to have machine learning testing because when test applications, manual work could be completed automatically using this functionality."

"This is an area for improvement with the tool. We unnecessarily use JMeter for some website testing, which we would like to avoid by introducing this tool for API and load testing because it provides load testing features."

"I'd not sure if they have the same level of documentation for performance and security testing."

"I want the solution to be able to monitor Apache Kafka activity as well."

"We need some time to understand and configure the solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"It's a very expensive solution"

"LoadRunner always had expensive pricing. At my company, we used to evaluate LoadRunner, but we stuck with Silk Performer because its pricing was always better in the past. I do feel that I got a fair deal this time. Our value-added reseller and our sales guy worked hard to give us a fair deal. I feel that we got a fair deal. We did not go for the pay-as-you-go deal. I did an upfront package. I prefer that. I want to know what my costs are."

"The solution’s price is considerably high."

"The pricing for OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is average."

"There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."

"It is expensive compared to other tools."

"We make use of virtual user hours. We buy time in the LoadRunner Cloud. It costs around $80,000."

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing and cost advice

"ReadyAPI Performance’s pricing is reasonable."

"This solution operates on a licence basis and the usage and cost varies according to the use case. It is more expensive if you include access to the learning center. On average it costs approximately 800 Euros."

"We find the cost to be affordable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

25%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing tools. I like it because it provides many benefits. Some of the ones I find to...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

The pricing is high compared to other licensing tools like NeoLoad. It's not excessively expensive but higher than NeoLoad. However, in my experience, clients often weigh NeoLoad and LoadRunner equ...

See all answers

What do you like most about ReadyAPI Performance?

It's like a centralized interface that allows us to increase the quality of our APIs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ReadyAPI Performance?

Load UI is mostly free, and the pricing for the pro version is very affordable compared to other tools like LoadRunner.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ReadyAPI Performance?

The client-side scripting mostly isn't needed for performance testing, however, if implemented, it would enhance the tool.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 26% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 25% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 22% of the time

BlazeMeter vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 19% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Competitors

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 47% of the time

Apache JMeter vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 33% of the time

SmartBear LoadNinja vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 21% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

March 2025

Download OpenText LoadRunner Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Performance

March 2025

Download ReadyAPI Performance product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load

LoadUI NG Pro

Overview

Do your performance and load testing in the cloud. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud makes it easy to plan, run, and scale performance tests without the need to deploy and manage infrastructure.

OpenText

ReadyAPI Performance is an open-source load and quality assurance testing solution whose design allows organizations of all sizes to completely control their load testing process. It gives administrators the ability to customize their testing parameters and tests to best meet their needs. They can also quickly run the tests that they need to run in order to guarantee the peak performance of their application and various network components.

ReadyAPI Performance Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by deploying ReadyAPI Performance include:

Run ReadyAPI Performance on the operating system of your choice. It is a system agnostic solution and can be deployed on any of the major operating systems that are currently on the market.

Track events in real time. ReadyAPI Performance enables users to monitor every part of their application and network in real time. This makes it possible for administrators to spot potential issues and resolve them before they can harm their application’s performance.

Test flexibility. Administrators can customize the tests that they run to best fit their particular needs. Any test that an organization needs can be designed and run by this solution without the need for integration with additional solutions.

ReadyAPI Performance Features

Some of the many useful features ReadyAPI Performance has to offer include:

Test customization tools. Users have access to a number of tools that enable them to set the parameters of and design the tests that they run to meet their application requirements. These tools make it possible for them to tweak the tests while they are running, should that prove necessary. Administrators can drag and drop the components that they want to use to create the tests.

Test report generator. ReadyAPI Performance comes with a report generator that provides users with easy to understand test insights. After the tests end, this feature produces a report that shows not only the results of the test, but also an analysis that enables administrators to understand the implications of their test results.

Robust load testing capabilities. ReadyAPI Performance’s load testing tools can handle high volumes of load testing.

Reviews from Real Users

ReadyAPI Performance is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. It can offer organizations many advantages. Two major advantages are the wealth of features that it makes available to users and the ease with which organizations can deploy it for use.

Kumar G., a software engineer at Birlasoft India Ltd., writes, “It provides many features. It facilitates load testing, operational volume testing, spike testing for the APIs, and the API is very fast It stores good reports, as in, improved reports if compared with SoapUI. It also has in-built security. You just need to switch and check the security testing.”

He also writes, “The initial setup is not very complex. For testers, they have to create their test cases and scenarios within ReadyAPI, and there they simply go for the load testing.”

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant

Mercedes-Benz, Adobe, Hilton Hotels, The Home Depot

Buyer's Guide

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. ReadyAPI Performance

April 2025

Free Report: OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. ReadyAPI Performance

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. ReadyAPI Performance and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. ReadyAPI Performance report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors and best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.