Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Output Management vs Ricoh InfoPrint comparison

 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Output Management
Ranking in Output Management
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ricoh InfoPrint
Ranking in Output Management
3rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Output Management category, the mindshare of OpenText Output Management is 39.8%, up from 33.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ricoh InfoPrint is 11.4%, down from 21.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Output Management
 

Featured Reviews

it_user567633 - PeerSpot reviewer
It's relatively easy to get a hold of resources that understand and know how they work.
For a company like RAK Ceramics, virtualization and cloud is the obvious way to go. The problem is the cost justification for the transition; that's the difficult bit. Some help with that would be good. They spend a huge amount of money running their own data centers. It seems crazy for them to do that. Getting it all out onto the cloud would be a much more sensible way for them to go. Whether they'll go for it or not, I don't know. We're just starting the discussions at the moment. As far as any other areas with room for improvement, it's all the usual stuff: faster, cheaper.
Use Ricoh InfoPrint?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Output Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Also Known As

HPE Output Server, HP Output Server, Output Server
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Agilent, Allergan, Columbus McKinnon, HP, Iron Mountain, Moen, Valero
ABN AMRO, ABB Spain