OpenText Functional Testing and OpenText Silk Test are automation tools in the software testing category. Based on feature set and application, OpenText Functional Testing appears to have the upper hand, especially for complex environments, due to its extensive automation features.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing supports extensive browser and technology compatibility, enabling GUI, API, and mobile testing. It excels in object recognition and offers broad third-party integration. OpenText Silk Test provides robust scripting capabilities, supports various programming languages, and is highly reliable for browser testing with keyword-driven frameworks.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing could benefit from enhancements in speed, reduced memory usage, and expanded testing capabilities. Improved browser support and more frequent updates would help. OpenText Silk Test users seek better browser compatibility in line with evolving technologies and more comprehensive support documentation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both OpenText Functional Testing and OpenText Silk Test provide flexible deployment options, including on-premises and cloud. Customer service reviews are mixed, with some acknowledging effective technical support but also noting delays in responsiveness and resolution.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing is more costly, justified by its comprehensive features and broad application support, yielding positive ROI for complex technology environments. OpenText Silk Test is seen as more budget-friendly, appealing to enterprises seeking efficient automation. Both tools offer significant ROI when well-integrated into testing strategies.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 8.8% |
| OpenText Silk Test | 1.1% |
| Other | 90.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
