Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Oracle Database In-Memory vs Tibero comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Database In-Memory
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
8th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.3
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
Embedded Database (3rd)
Tibero
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
28th
Average Rating
9.4
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Oracle Database In-Memory is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tibero is 0.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Relational Databases Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Duy AnhMai - PeerSpot reviewer
Improved data processing speeds with enhanced security and processing efficiency
We use Oracle Database In-Memory to deploy applications for commercial purposes, store data securely, and ensure efficient data processing Oracle Database In-Memory has improved data storage and processing efficiency, which is crucial for handling large amounts of data in our products and…
it_user452925 - PeerSpot reviewer
It's easy to port your projects over, and it is cheaper than other software on the market.
It is incredibly fast, much faster than Oracle in terms of compiling and processing speeds. It is very reliable, the software never crashes or gets overloaded. It is very secure, the true data never gets falsified or corrupted. It is very easy to port your projects over, and it is considerably cheaper than any other software on the market.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The on-premise version is stable. We have different teams and resources for the server side, for admin, and for development. We can easily take care of all the services and applications."
"The scalability is very good."
"Oracle Database In-Memory is a suite of features that improves performance for real-time analytics and mixed workloads."
"Security is the most valuable feature."
"The application development is very user-friendly."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its performance optimization within our hardware environment."
"The scalability of the solution is very good. It's able to support large amounts of data."
"We can integrate it with any data sources as well."
"Tibero is very easy to setup and maintain."
"Tibero is a relational database management system, which supports disaster recovery, active cluster, active storage, etc."
"The most valuable feature is compatibility with the Oracle database."
"Tibero uses Hyper-Threading architecture, which is incredibly fast."
 

Cons

"Oracle Database In-Memory is more expensive than Azure, and the support from the Oracle team is not very good, especially since they do not have a support team in our region."
"The solution should move to the new way of writing software code with AI that is intelligent and learns."
"The high cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The platform’s pricing needs improvement."
"Oracle should include column store or advanced query optimization so a database can be optimized by enabling analytic queries to run faster."
"Technical support is below our expectations currently. It could be improved."
"They should improve the solution's scalability for large databases."
"It would be good if Oracle could reduce downtime when transferring from non-In-Memory to In-Memory."
"In PL/SQL code, there is a scope of improvement. We expect more PL/SQL packages should be included in the next release."
"The knowledge base is quite small and should be expanded."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Database In-Memory is priced a bit higher than its competitors like Microsoft."
"I rate the pricing a zero out of ten because Database In-Memory is too costly."
"The product is expensive."
"The solution's pricing is high."
"The platform's licensing cost needs improvement."
"It's quite costly and it comes with a fixed price."
"There is a need to make a yearly payment towards the licensing costs, after which there is any to pay towards the support cost attached to the solution."
"Oracle Database In-Memory is expensive."
"The overall costs are very low compared to Oracle."
"The price of Tibero is cheaper than that of Oracle."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
Government
15%
University
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Database In-Memory?
We can integrate it with any data sources as well.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database In-Memory?
Oracle Database In-Memory is very expensive. Additionally, there are extra costs for some features.
What needs improvement with Oracle Database In-Memory?
Oracle Database In-Memory is more expensive than Azure, and the support from the Oracle team is not very good, especially since they do not have a support team in our region.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Shanghai Customs
NSPK, Indian Financial Technology & Allied Services (IFTAS), fonePaisa Payment Solutions
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Database In-Memory vs. Tibero and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.