Oracle Database In-Memory vs Tibero comparison

Oracle and TmaxSoft are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Oracle is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.3, while TmaxSoft is ranked #29. Oracle holds a 1.4% mindshare in SQL, compared to TmaxSoft’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TmaxSoft users who would recommend it.

Oracle Database In-Memory

Read 29 Oracle Database In-Memory reviews

1,122 Views
913 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tibero

Read 4 Tibero reviews

623 Views
531 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Database In-Memory

Tibero

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Database In-Memory and Tibero based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Database In-Memory vs. Tibero Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Database In-Memory vs. Tibero

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 832,138 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Database In-Memory

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Embedded Database (3rd)

Tibero

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

29th

Average Rating

9.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Oracle Database In-Memory is 1.4%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tibero is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Md Al-Amin

Senior System Analyst at Thakral

Ensures that users experience a good return on investment

Firstly, a user should prepare the operating system for installation, and then we have to copy the software to install the product. When dealing with scenarios related to Oracle Real Application Clusters, users need to add nodes and storage. The setup process is a little bit complex compared to DB2. The setup process of Oracle Database In-Memory takes around five to six hours to install Oracle Real Application Clusters, if everything is okay, apart from which the other processes will take a day. The solution is deployed on an on-premises model. The cloud-based solution is available for testing and development, and it need not be installed in your environment. A user just needs to do a few clicks and select the database, after which it automatically gets installed in the cloud. Only in the on-premises version of the product, there is a need to do some work in the tool.

Read full review

it_user452925

Consultant at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

It's easy to port your projects over, and it is cheaper than other software on the market.

It is incredibly fast, much faster than Oracle in terms of compiling and processing speeds. It is very reliable, the software never crashes or gets overloaded. It is very secure, the true data never gets falsified or corrupted. It is very easy to port your projects over, and it is considerably cheaper than any other software on the market.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Normally, every database server uses hard disks. In-Memory has a feature, apart from their database, which is very good. When we start our server, all your data needs loading memory. We can use that. It's a very good feature. I think they added this feature in 2019. We can mount memory in the partition, create partitions in there, and create table space from that spot to share. It's a really good feature. We use it a lot."

"The scalability of the solution is very good. It's able to support large amounts of data."

"The most valuable aspects of this solution are the fast caching and improved performance to the database"

"We find the dashboard and the speed of data processing very valuable in Oracle Database In-Memory."

"It accelerates query processing, which in turn speeds up operations and streamlines workflow, and ultimately enhancing productivity."

"The solution is very fast."

"The product offers high scalability."

"We can integrate it with any data sources as well."

More Oracle Database In-Memory pros

"The most valuable feature is compatibility with the Oracle database."

"Tibero uses Hyper-Threading architecture, which is incredibly fast."

"Tibero is a relational database management system, which supports disaster recovery, active cluster, active storage, etc."

"Tibero is very easy to setup and maintain."

Cons

"Oracle Database In-Memory appliance-based solutions can be restrictive for some applications, as they may require more flexibility in the database design to be tuned and sized to the customer's needs."

"The platform’s pricing needs improvement."

"We use some partitions in In-Memory. We have a very large table and a low dose. It is very expensive in data to load all of them into In-Memory. It takes up more memory slots in the server, as well as a lot of RAM. We use last partitions on the table. We always need to create a script and make a schedule that can load a last partition in In-Memory. Oracle doesn't have features to do this automatically. I would like them to allow us to load last partitions, as well as other table partitions, in In-Memory. I think a good feature would do that automatically, letting you see a table, load a large partition, and monitor loading memory. It's quite a good feature."

"The solution is quite expensive."

"I would like Oracle Database In-Memory to include a data replication feature."

"They should improve the solution's scalability for large databases."

"The pricing could be improved. It would ideal if it was more reasonable."

"It would be good if Oracle could reduce downtime when transferring from non-In-Memory to In-Memory."

More Oracle Database In-Memory cons

"In PL/SQL code, there is a scope of improvement. We expect more PL/SQL packages should be included in the next release."

"The knowledge base is quite small and should be expanded."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Oracle Database In-Memory is expensive."

"The pricing is pretty good so I rate it an eight out of ten."

"The solution's pricing is high."

"The product is expensive."

"Database In-Memory is priced a bit higher than its competitors like Microsoft."

"There is a need to make a yearly payment towards the licensing costs, after which there is any to pay towards the support cost attached to the solution."

"It's quite costly and it comes with a fixed price."

"The platform's licensing cost needs improvement."

More Oracle Database In-Memory pricing and cost advice

"The price of Tibero is cheaper than that of Oracle."

"The overall costs are very low compared to Oracle."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

17%

University

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Database In-Memory?

We can integrate it with any data sources as well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database In-Memory?

Oracle Database In-Memory is very expensive. Additionally, there are extra costs for some features.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Database In-Memory?

Oracle Database In-Memory is more expensive than Azure, and the support from the Oracle team is not very good, especially since they do not have a support team in our region.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SAP HANA vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 31% of the time

SQL Server vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 16% of the time

Progress OpenEdge RDBMS vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Derby vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle Database In-Memory Competitors

Oracle Database vs Tibero

Compared 80% of the time

MariaDB vs Tibero

Compared 20% of the time

More Tibero Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Database In-Memory

January 2025

Download Oracle Database In-Memory product report

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

January 2025

Download Tibero product report

Overview

Oracle Database In-Memory transparently accelerates analytics by orders of magnitude while simultaneously speeding up mixed-workload OLTP. With Oracle Database In-Memory, users get immediate answers to business questions that previously took hours.

Oracle Database In-Memory delivers leading-edge in-memory performance without the need to restrict functionality, or accept compromises, complexity and risk. Deploying Oracle Database In-Memory with any existing Oracle Database compatible application is as easy as flipping a switch - no application changes are required. Oracle Database In-Memory is fully integrated with the Oracle Database’s renowned scale-up, scale-out, storage tiering, availability, and security technologies making it the most industrialstrength offering on the market.

The ability to easily perform real-time data analysis together with real-time transaction processing on all existing applications enables organizations to transform into Real-Time Enterprises that quickly make data-driven decisions, respond instantly to customer demands, and continuously optimize all key processes.

For more information on Oracle Database In-Memory, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

Tibero by TmaxSoft bridges the gap between legacy relational databases and the new paradigm of running workloads in virtualized data centers and the Cloud, allowing enterprises to fully leverage their investment by embracing a simple, true utilization licensing model.

TmaxSoft

Sample Customers

Shanghai Customs

NSPK, Indian Financial Technology & Allied Services (IFTAS), fonePaisa Payment Solutions

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Database In-Memory vs. Tibero

January 2025

Free Report: Oracle Database In-Memory vs. Tibero

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Database In-Memory vs. Tibero and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Database In-Memory vs. Tibero report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.