Perforce QA Wizard Pro vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

Perforce and Tricentis are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Perforce is ranked #38, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. Perforce holds a 0.2% mindshare in FT, compared to Tricentis’s 19.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Tricentis users are willing to recommend the solution.

Perforce QA Wizard Pro

Read 1 Perforce QA Wizard Pro review

103 Views
69 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 109 Tricentis Tosca reviews

15,036 Views
8,245 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Perforce QA Wizard Pro

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Perforce QA Wizard Pro and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Perforce QA Wizard Pro

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

38th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

24th

Average Rating

5.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

1st

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

109

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (1st), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Perforce QA Wizard Pro is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 19.8%, up from 15.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

AlonKalangel

DevOps Engineer at Intel Corporation

Shared change lists are helpful, but poor scalability leads to problems with instability

The biggest problems with this solution have to do with scale. If the load is high then your request is put on hold for a second, and then you have to handle it. If you make a lot of requests then it is your problem. It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time. Any additional request would be put on hold and made to wait for a few seconds. Once the network and infrastructure are loaded to handle the next request, it would proceed.

Read full review

Antonio Oteri

IT Telecom Quality Senior Tester at TIM

Ability to automate tests across various platforms and simplifies test creation

From what I've seen with my colleagues who make the software selection, the prices for this software in Brazil are too expensive to be applied to anything but huge customers. I'm surprised because I was in charge of planning and control at the company before, when there was a manager there. Normally, the company has structural licenses that are based on the company they are selling to. I see that these companies cannot spend this money on Tricentis. I think Tosca is losing this type of market. They should have a different license policy for medium and small companies. The same happened in the past with SAP, which changed its policy and also made licenses for low.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list."

"This solution is very easy to learn and any non-programmer or manual tester, with little experience in automation, can pick it up quite easily."

"We are satisfied with the support of Tricentis."

"The most valuable feature of Tricentis Tosca is the Tosca Commander. Functionality is another thing I find most valuable in the solution."

"Object Identification Wizard."

"The product enables codeless automation."

"Tricentis Tosca can be easily integrated with SAP infrastructure."

"This solution is easy to use for everybody, including those who are not IT-educated."

"We like the fact that it works across mobile, desktop, web, and APIs. Due to this, the solution has a broad range of applications."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time."

"A disadvantage of Tricentis Tosca is that you have to customize it according to your need, during the early stages of the software, particularly during upstream testing, before system and unit testing."

"Tricentis Tosca could improve on its mobile automation solution."

"The user management could improve in Tricentis Tosca because it is confusing. It would be better to have it in one place. Having to add it to the cloud and to a specific project can be a mess."

"Might have a learning curve, as it does not follow the traditional Record-Play functionality, but tests have to be built from requirements or Agile story cards."

"First, Tricentis could improve Tosca's Linux scripting. We can automate Linux scripting, but there are a few commands that Tosca doesn't support. DVS support and the object identification mechanism could also be better."

"It needs better integration with JIRA."

"The integration with mobile testing could be useful."

"Not being able to mask test data in relation to testing data management, in my opinion, is also a limitation."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the pricing a ten. The licensing model is based on a yearly basis."

"Tricentis Tosca is an expensive tool and the licensing is not simple."

"I would like to see better costing packs. There are several features but USD $11,000 for one license is expensive."

"A yearly license costs around 20,000 euros."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"The tool is expensive. It has become overpriced, especially after Tricentis Tosca grew as a company. Initially, we bought a license with an annual support fee, which wasn't too expensive. However, they changed the model, and now we have to purchase a license yearly, which has become quite costly."

"It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools."

"My understanding is that it's an expensive product, although I don't know the specifics with regards to pricing."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 11% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 10% of the time

Testim vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 7% of the time

UiPath Test Suite vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 6% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

January 2025

Download Perforce QA Wizard Pro product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

January 2025

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Overview

QA Wizard Pro automates functional and regression testing of web, Windows, and Java applications, and load test web applications.

Perforce

Tricentis Tosca is primarily leveraged for test automation across web, SAP, API, and mainframe applications, offering robust support for both regression and functional testing.

Tricentis Tosca's test automation capabilities extend to front-end and back-end testing, including processes like RPA and UI-based regression tests on Microsoft Windows. It supports Agile environments with multiple applications, enabling Salesforce automation, API endpoints, and end-to-end automation workflows. Tosca caters to diverse testing needs, integrating well with tools like Jenkins and Bamboo, although upgrades and customizations present challenges. Licensing costs and performance issues during loading and scanning are concerns, along with substantial learning curves for new users. Enhanced AI features and better reporting are on users' wishlist.

What are the key features of Tricentis Tosca?

Tosca BI: Ensures data integrity and accuracy in business intelligence testing
Tosca Commander: Centralized control for easy test management and maintenance
Model-Based Test Automation: Facilitates test creation without scripting
Integration Capabilities: Works seamlessly with Jenkins and Bamboo for CI/CD
Diverse Application Support: Compatible with mobile, web, APIs, and SAP
Scriptless Nature: Simplifies usage and reduces maintenance efforts

What benefits should users consider?

Enhanced Automation: Streamlines testing processes, saving time and resources
Scalability: Adapts to growing demands within an organization
Test Management: Centralized control enhances efficiency and oversight
Ease of Use: Scriptless approach lowers the barrier to entry for users

Tricentis Tosca is implemented across various industries, serving sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail with test automation solutions to ensure application quality and reliability. Agile teams in these industries benefit from its multi-application support and ability to manage complex end-to-end testing workflows. The tool's integration capabilities are particularly useful in environments that rely on CI/CD pipelines, ensuring continuous testing and quick feedback loops.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Ubisoft, Expedia, Honda, Samsung,Citrix

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

January 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Regression Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.