Picus Security vs SafeBreach comparison

Picus Security and SafeBreach are both solutions in the Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) category. Picus Security is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.0, while SafeBreach is ranked #7. Picus Security holds a 18.3% mindshare in BAS, compared to SafeBreach’s 6.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Picus Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SafeBreach users who would recommend it.

Picus Security

Read 6 Picus Security reviews

2,412 Views
1,751 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SafeBreach

Read 2 SafeBreach reviews

1,377 Views
804 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Picus Security

SafeBreach

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

SafeBreach and Picus Security offer breach and attack simulation platforms within the cybersecurity industry. SafeBreach holds an advantage in pricing satisfaction, while Picus Security provides superior features that deliver greater value.

Features: SafeBreach offers automated attack simulations, comprehensive analytics, and robust insights into security postures. Picus Security provides adaptive threat intelligence, in-depth reporting capabilities, and real-time threat updates for a proactive edge.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SafeBreach features a straightforward deployment model and comprehensive support for easy integration. Picus Security offers a modular deployment model with potential for flexibility but may require more hands-on assistance. SafeBreach's support is often seen as more responsive.

Pricing and ROI: SafeBreach is noted for competitive setup costs with a focus on long-term ROI due to continuous testing. Picus Security, potentially more expensive initially, provides strong ROI with its threat detection features. SafeBreach is more budget-friendly, while Picus Security's higher investment is justified by its benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Picus Security vs. SafeBreach Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Picus Security vs. SafeBreach

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Picus Security

Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

3rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SafeBreach

Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) category, the mindshare of Picus Security is 18.3%, up from 17.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SafeBreach is 6.0%, down from 9.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

Featured Reviews

erdemerdag

Cybersecurity Operations Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Breach and attack simulation software that provides network, endpoint, and email vectors

According to the attack vectors, you cannot specify which product is failing or which product is working well because there's no agent. The best case scenario is to add an agent solution where an agent would have the ability to actually detect which programs aren't working. For the attack software, you put a peer on the cloud site, and you have another peer internal network. There is IPS, firewall, WAF, and DBS amongst these peers. The cloud's peer is trying to send the attack file to the internal network. Maybe the firewall is blocking it, maybe the IP, maybe the WAF, but you cannot see the details. You can say, "Yes, my security product is blocking that attack scenario," or, "I cannot block this attack."

Read full review

Dmytro Petrashchuk

CTO at IT Specialist LLC

Breach and attach simulation solution used to test security tools with a valuable library of hacking data

The most valuable feature is the huge library of hack attacks and breach methods. It can run different attacks in a safe manner without damaging anything inside the infrastructure. The great thing is that the database is constantly updating. It has signature attack playbooks to check if a company is protected against a potential attack.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Picus Security is its threat intelligence, providing suggestions to block and prevent attacks by identifying malicious files and providing threat IDs."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration capabilities with the other security tools."

"One of the most valuable features would be the detection capability, specifically the ability to detect alarms and logs collected from SIEM tools."

"You have the liberty of physically executing a specific set of rules in your environment."

"It provides good reports and offers signature-based solutions."

"It's very useful software because the customer mostly configures their IPS and manages their firewalls, WAF, and the DBS according to the latest update, latest news, or according to the situation."

"The most valuable feature is the reporting database and attack protection."

"The most valuable feature is the huge library of hack attacks and breach methods."

Cons

"According to the attack vectors, you cannot specify which product is failing or which product is working well because there's no agent."

"The amount of integrations that the product can handle is an area of concern, making it one of the aspects where improvements are required."

"The reporting and data analysis could be improved. Specifically, the analysis of the results."

"Let's say if a customer's environment has 10 security devices and they need to know that there is an attack that has bypassed their devices, they cannot go and inspect every device and every rule in their security devices."

"There is room for improvement in the response rate provided by customer support."

"To improve, Picus Security could consider establishing a data center in India to address trust issues and increase interest from Indian customers."

"There is room for improvement in the interface. It is not always easy to find the options that you need and not everything is customizable."

"I would like to see some integration on the customization and customer support."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They have certain price ranges for their products, depending upon the use cases, and the number of applications the customer wants to try."

"There is a yearly license according to the number of vectors. The pricing is moderate."

"The price starts from about $140,000 so this solution is expensive in my opinion. Maintenance and support is included in the license cost."

"The pricing is more expensive than other options on the market today."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Picus Security?

The most valuable feature of Picus Security is its threat intelligence, providing suggestions to block and prevent attacks by identifying malicious files and providing threat IDs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Picus Security?

The pricing of Picus Security is average, and it offers a good value for money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Picus Security?

There is room for improvement in the response rate provided by customer support. Picus Security could improve the response time.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Pentera vs Picus Security

Compared 35% of the time

Cymulate vs Picus Security

Compared 31% of the time

AttackIQ vs Picus Security

Compared 13% of the time

XM Cyber vs Picus Security

Compared 4% of the time

Tenable One Exposure Management Platform vs Picus Security

Compared 3% of the time

More Picus Security Competitors

XM Cyber vs SafeBreach

Compared 24% of the time

Pentera vs SafeBreach

Compared 20% of the time

Cymulate vs SafeBreach

Compared 16% of the time

AttackIQ vs SafeBreach

Compared 15% of the time

More SafeBreach Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Picus Security

March 2025

Download Picus Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

March 2025

Download SafeBreach product report

Overview

Independent from any vendor or technology, the unparalleled Picus Platform is designed to continuously measure the effectiveness of security defenses by using emerging threat samples in production environments. Created by a team that’s been working together more than 10 years already and has proven their expertise in enterprise cybersecurity, Picus is trusted by many large multinational corporations and government agencies.

Picus Security

SafeBreach is the world's most widely used continuous security validation platform in enterprise companies. The company's patented platform empowers CISOs and their teams to validate security controls, maximize their effectiveness, and drive down risk.

SafeBreach provides a "hacker's view" of an enterprise's security posture by continuously validating security controls and presenting findings in customized dashboards to enable stakeholders to cleanly focus on the biggest risk to the organization. SafeBreach automatically and safely executes thousands of attack methods to validate network, endpoint, cloud, container, and email security controls against the Hacker's Playbook, the world's largest collection of attack data broken down by methods, tactics, and threat actors. Data from SafeBreach validations can improve SOC team responses and empower management to make smarter decisions to better manage risk and invest resources.

SafeBreach

Sample Customers

Akbank, Exclusive Networks, Garanti, ING Bank, QNB Finansbank, Turkcell, Vodafone, Yapı Kredi

PayPal, ICON, Netflix, Johnson & Johnson, CVS Health, Pepsi, Kellogg's, Cisco, Deloitte

Buyer's Guide

Picus Security vs. SafeBreach

March 2025

Free Report: Picus Security vs. SafeBreach

Find out what your peers are saying about Picus Security vs. SafeBreach and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Picus Security vs. SafeBreach report.

See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.