Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Planview IdeaPlace vs Qmarkets comparison

 

Categories and Ranking

Planview IdeaPlace
Ranking in Innovation Management Software
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Qmarkets
Ranking in Innovation Management Software
2nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Innovation Management Software category, the mindshare of Planview IdeaPlace is 50.0%, up from 26.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qmarkets is 16.7%, down from 20.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Innovation Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

NT
May 10, 2020
Provides a mechanism for our leadership to understand the pulse of what's happening in our operations
The thing that has been most valuable is the access, so that people are able to leverage the platform no matter where they are physically located in our system. Also, the backend algorithm helps us filter the ideas or comments that carry the most weight to the top so that management has a more manageable list of focus-items to go through. The dashboards and reporting are helpful from an administration standpoint, for us to really know what's going on within a challenge. They help give us a snapshot of what the high-level themes are that are coming out, as well as monitor engagements so that we can push additional communications if need be, if engagement isn't quite where we want it to be. The customized reports really allow us to tailor the use case exactly for individual sponsors. What the platform and the customized reports are getting at is providing one solution where a number of different stakeholders can engage in a very customized way and get the feedback they're looking for. The flexibility that the platform and the reports provide is part of the value that we're seeing in our organization. The insights and analytics capabilities — the dashboard views as well as the reports — are pretty critical for us to be able to measure whether what we were trying to get out of the challenge is actually received. We can track it on an ongoing basis during the challenge to make sure that we're trending in the right direction and, if not, we can make some pivots to improve things. We also look at them to assess the overall success of the challenge. In addition, the workflow on the backend is customizable from the beginning. We understood the levers that we could pull in order to adjust the workflow to match exactly what we are trying to do. And it is very flexible. From the very beginning this wasn't a problem because we designed for exactly what we wanted.
Use Qmarkets?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a tiered annual licensing fee."
"Because the platform is used in another department, we have one parent. We are able to break off and do platforms for other business units under that parent."
"The yearly licensing cost is $55,000."
"Planview could drop the price for Spigit. I've done two market assessments and I think that they're overpriced pretty considerably right now."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Innovation Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Planview Spigit, Spigit
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Pfizer, UnitedHealth Group, Citi, AT&T, Cambia Health, Siemens, Veridian Credit Union, Polaris, UNHCR, CCA Global
Hyundai, Ford, Intel, Raytheon Technologies, Total, UniCredit, Lufthansa, Swiss Post, Schindler, Volkswagen, UBS, Philip Morris International, etc.