Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Prodacapo [EOL] vs SAS Activity-Based Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Prodacapo [EOL]
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAS Activity-Based Management
Average Rating
5.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Business Performance Management (17th)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Prodacapo [EOL]?
Share your opinion
it_user195021 - PeerSpot reviewer
OLAP data extraction and export is a valuable feature but the drilling function needs to be brought back.
ABM: * We use ABM as an expense allocation model and it has improve the awareness and accountability of the cost incurred (due to the 'traceability' feature as mentioned in no.4 above). * We are able to run and refresh the expense allocation result based on monthly source data (Driver Quantity) to derive more accurate data for reporting. (We are aware that many other organisations are using excel spreadsheet to perform their allocation and it has very much restricted the frequency and complexity of the allocation that they can be performed). EG has helped to handle huge database ETL which definitely improve efficiency.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.
831,369 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Pipeline Group
Bank of Queensland, Barclays Bank, BioMar, Danske Bank, Danske Spil, DPPS, First Allied
Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, IBM and others in Business Performance Management. Updated: December 2024.
831,369 professionals have used our research since 2012.