Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Qualitia Automation Studio vs Selenium HQ comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Qualitia Automation Studio
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Test Automation Tools (25th)
Selenium HQ
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
108
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (4th), Regression Testing Tools (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. Qualitia Automation Studio is designed for Test Automation Tools and holds a mindshare of 0.2%, up 0.2% compared to last year.
Selenium HQ, on the other hand, focuses on Functional Testing Tools, holds 4.6% mindshare, down 6.3% since last year.
Test Automation Tools
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

it_user189918 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 4, 2015
Good Tool for Non Technical Users.
I think Qualitia's scriptless test automation tool is best used on teams that have Manual QA Testers who are looking to start to automate regression tests but are not very technical in nature. I think recognizing the overall strategy of implementing a test automation solution is extremely important when choosing a tool. If the tests are just going to be run from a local machine, then maybe a full solution like this is not what you need. But if you want to run tests on different servers and have them included in your build process, then a solution like Qualitia would help your team out. Just remember that Qualitia's technical support team is really something that will set their product apart from other similar solutions. They really do care about their customers success.
Naveen Alok - PeerSpot reviewer
May 4, 2022
Continuously being developed and large community makes it easy to find solutions
There are a few things we have to actually design and plan when we are building the automation. There are new tools which handle it by themselves, but that is a give and take when you actually use or choose a tool. Shadow DOM could be improved and the handling of single page applications. Right now, it's a bit complicated and there are a lot of additional scripts required if you want to handle a single page application in a neat way. With these technologies, at times you have a lot of callbacks. Those aren't handled very well with Selenium. At some point of time, suppose you have entered something and the button needs to be enabled. Now, in normal terms, it seems to be a client side action, so if you enter something on the client side, JavaScript is running. It'll say, "Value is this, so I'll enable the button." With this technology, if you enter something, it will go back to the server, get some value, and then it will enable the button. At some point of time, your project's delayed, and there is a callback happening in the background. It will not try to understand that, and it may just timeout.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."
"Our platform runs into several thousand screens and a few thousand test cases, something which would typically take months to test manually. As of today, the entire process takes a little over two days to run."
"The solution is very easy to use. Once you learn how to do things, it becomes very intuitive and simple."
"I believe Selenium HQ to be the best solution in the market for automating web applications"
"The testing solution produces the best web applications."
"The most valuable features of Selenium HQ are the automation of all UI tests, its open-source, reliability, and is supported by Google."
"It is a good automation tool."
"The tool is easy to use and log in with respect to other tools. It is open-source. We can customize the product. I also like its security."
"What I like the most about this product is that it gives us a lot of freedom to code anything, there is no restriction on the type of function you can do."
 

Cons

"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."
"The drawback is the solution is not easy to learn."
"An improvement to Selenium HQ would be the inclusion of a facility to work on Shadow DOM."
"It would be very great if Selenium would provide some framework examples so newcomers could get started more quickly."
"I would like to see XPath made more reliable so that it can be used in all browsers."
"Selenium has room for improvement as it does not support the tests and result-sharing in anything but a manual way."
"Selenium could offer better ways to record and create scripts. IDE is available, however, it can be improved."
"Katalon has built a UI on top of Selenium to make it more user-friendly, as well as repository options and the ability to create repositories for objects, among other things. It would be helpful if this type of information could be included in the Selenium tool itself, so people wouldn't have to do filing testing."
"I would like to see some reporting or test management tools."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is on a higher end but the competition was even more expensive. With this considered, it is a competitive solution."
"Selenium is open-source, so there are no setup costs associated with it."
"Selenium is open-source."
"Selenium HQ is a free solution."
"Selenium is free software so we do not pay licensing costs."
"Selenium HQ is a free solution."
"The setup cost is open source or free."
"Since it is an open source. It is free to use. However my company see it as the future of load testing."
"It is free to use."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Insurance Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
10%
Transportation Company
9%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Qualitia Automation Studio?
The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualitia Automation Studio?
Pricing is on a higher end but the competition was even more expensive. With this considered, it is a competitive solution.
What needs improvement with Qualitia Automation Studio?
The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack.
How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?
Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...
What do you like most about Selenium HQ?
Selenium's open-source nature is a key advantage. Its extensive support for diverse web technologies.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Selenium HQ?
Selenium is open-source, so there are no setup costs associated with it.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
SeleniumHQ
 

Learn More

Video not available
Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Springer, PTC, ZS, Shaadi.com, JDA, Cbazaar
BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.