Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Quest On Demand Migration vs Rivery comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Quest On Demand Migration
Ranking in Migration Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Rivery
Ranking in Migration Tools
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (34th), Cloud Migration (13th), Cloud Data Integration (19th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Migration Tools category, the mindshare of Quest On Demand Migration is 39.4%, up from 31.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rivery is 0.2%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Migration Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Adrian Stier - PeerSpot reviewer
Fast migrations, very easy to use, and fair price
There are certain tools or apps that are not supported at the moment, but as I know Quest, they'll be very fast in picking that up and very fast in adding on features. At the moment, it makes my life easier when I do a migration. We can do Teams and we can migrate the chat, but I do run into some features, such as Wiki and probably Whiteboard, that are not supported at the moment. Since Teams has grown and has become such a key app or service, sometimes, it's hard to explain to customers that we cannot migrate everything. If they would improve that, I'd probably be one of the happiest people on the planet. One of the things that can be included is automation. For the matching and the migration process, they could put in some automation. I'm only allowed about 25 users at a time. If it's a large tenant, it takes quite a while to put them in the batches. If there is enough automation into that, that'd be perfect. Overall, I'm at a very high level of satisfaction, but it would be good to have these features.
reviewer2335923 - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides users with an initial setup phase, which is fairly simple to manage
I don't know what could be improved in terms of what my company was used to previously or after moving over to Rivery. I have not had much experience with platforms other than Rivery. For me, Rivalry was a way to step up from what we used. To be honest, I am not really sure what improvements could be made in Rivery. Pricing is a little steep for smaller organizations, I would say. The product's pricing model could be a little bit better. I am not aware if there are additional packages for smaller organizations, but if there are no packages available, then maybe that would be a good way to introduce something new in the tool.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is really stable when it comes to mailbox migration and all of the following work very well: the mail content, the OneDrive for Business content, and migrating all Azure AD objects."
"Quest allows you to customize your migration. For example, you can opt only to migrate Microsoft Teams and the related data or you can migrate all of Office 365. You can also choose to migrate accounts and mailboxes. Sometimes, we don't want to migrate SharePoint data, or we only want to migrate specific users."
"We can see the issues that may come up during migration. We can handle multiple workloads using this since it connects with Microsoft 365."
"It's very easy to use. What I like is that if there is an error, for each task, I can find out what actually went wrong."
"The greatest asset is its nature as a SaaS product, offering exceptional scalability and flexibility, which are invaluable to us."
"The most valuable features of Quest On Demand Migration have been the M365 migration and Active Directory (AD) migration components."
"The solution supports multiple workloads. We've got Outlook, OneDrive, SharePoint, Teams, and Azure under the same place. It's really easy to see the progress in each of those areas. It's very important to have everything in one place. Otherwise, we'd have to use different platforms to handle different parts of the migration."
"We can easily and simply work out the cost for any migration work that is required with the licensing model."
"The solution's most valuable features are that it is quick to connect and simple to use."
"Connects to many APIs in the market and new ones are being added all the time."
 

Cons

"One significant issue that often elicited complaints during domain migration was the need to set the primary UPN for objects once they were migrated to the target."
"One of the things that can be included is automation. For the matching and the migration process, they could put in some automation. I'm only allowed about 25 users at a time. If it's a large tenant, it takes quite a while to put them in the batches. If there is enough automation into that, that'd be perfect."
"We had some issues with migrating Teams."
"They could provide on-premises to online exchange components for the platform. It would be highly valuable."
"The granting of consent for doing the different tasks is confusing."
"In terms of Microsoft Teams, the only disappointment for us has been how the chats are migrated. They just don't look exactly the same as they would if you were logging on as normal. Obviously, when it comes to the user experience, you want the look and feel of everything to be replicated identically, and chats is the only part of it that doesn't look identical. However, it's not a 'car crash.' It's a slight deviation from what people would expect."
"It would be more useful if I could scope the dashboard. I would like to be able to scope the users that I want to see to a much smaller list. When I am looking into a tenant with 35,000 accounts, and I am only moving 2,000 of them, I wish that the guys had been smarter about the discovery, and I could have only discovered those accounts, but there is not too much to complain about."
"It's definitely the Microsoft Teams functionality that has a lot of aspects where improvements are needed. Microsoft 365 Groups are tightly connected to Teams and there are a lot of improvements needed there as well."
"Lineage and an impact analysis or logic dependency are lacking."
"Pricing is a little steep for smaller organizations, I would say. The product's pricing model could be a little bit better."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I find the pricing to be cost-efficient for what you receive with the Quest product."
"The product had reasonable pricing until the beginning of this year. Now, the price is increased by 20%."
"I thought On Demand Migration would be more expensive. I'm pleased with the cost that was quoted."
"It is quite cheap. Previously, I used to work for a big company, and they get quite a good deal, and now, I'm working for a small company, and even they get quite a good deal. So, its pricing is quite fair."
"The pricing is in line with other products."
"We are fine with the tool's pricing."
"It is more than fair for what you get."
"The solution is on the more expensive side, when you compare it not only to BitTitan but to other tools in the cloud market. Of course, you receive things like Quest's support organization."
"I rate the tool's price as six out of ten if I consider the lowest price to be one and the highest price to be ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Migration Tools solutions are best for your needs.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Healthcare Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Quest On Demand Migration?
The most valuable features of Quest On Demand Migration have been the M365 migration and Active Directory (AD) migration components.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quest On Demand Migration?
The product had reasonable pricing until the beginning of this year. Now, the price is increased by 20%.
What needs improvement with Quest On Demand Migration?
They could provide on-premises to online exchange components for the platform. It would be highly valuable.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rivery?
The tool's price can be a little steep for a small organization. I rate the tool's price as six out of ten if I consider the lowest price to be one and the highest price to be ten.
What needs improvement with Rivery?
I don't know what could be improved in terms of what my company was used to previously or after moving over to Rivery. I have not had much experience with platforms other than Rivery. For me, Rival...
What is your primary use case for Rivery?
My company has started to use the Rivery extract data from Hive. It is like a project management sort of program, and we started to use Rivery to get the data from there over into Mavenlink, so we ...
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Quest On Demand Migration vs. Rivery and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.