Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Rapid7 InsightVM vs WithSecure Elements Vulnerability Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Rapid7 InsightVM
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
59
Ranking in other categories
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (4th)
WithSecure Elements Vulnera...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (60th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Rapid7 InsightVM is designed for Risk-Based Vulnerability Management and holds a mindshare of 18.8%, up 13.6% compared to last year.
WithSecure Elements Vulnerability Management, on the other hand, focuses on Vulnerability Management, holds 0.2% mindshare, down 0.3% since last year.
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

Shakeel Ahmad - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 8, 2022
Brilliant audit report and scorecard but scans often get blocked by firewalls
Our company uses the Nexpose automation tools for validity, deactivation, assessment, and penetration testing. We can easily see if something has been exposed and manually focus on or follow main vulnerabilities.  We have 28 users and a JV license key for using the solution in our offline systems…
Use WithSecure Elements Vulnerability Management?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is cheaper than the other similar tools available in the market."
"The license is IP based. How many IPs you are using to scan is the amount of the license you have to buy. The number of users doesn't matter; many users can use it or only person. It depends on the culture of the organization."
"We purchase annual licenses."
"The solution's pricing is better than Nexus which charges a high amount for very little use."
"InsightVM is an expensive product, especially compared to its competitors, at around a million NOK per year."
"In some cases, we procure the licenses. In some cases, the customers directly buy the license from Rapid7."
"Our licensing costs are somewhere around $40,000 annually. There are no additional fees."
"The license is annual and this is the optimal approach when it comes to most software."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
40%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable Nessus?
You have full visibility across cloud, network, virtual, and containerized infrastructures with Rapid7 Insight VM. You can easily prioritize vulnerabilities using attacker analytics. Overall, Rapid...
What do you like most about Rapid7 InsightVM?
The product's initial setup phase was very easy.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

InsightVM, NeXpose
F-Secure Elements Vulnerability Management, F-Secure Radar
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ACS, Acosta, AllianceData, amazon.com, biogen idec, CBRE, CATERPILLAR, Deloitte, COACH, GameStop, IBM
Salins Group, Manhattan S.A, Solita Oy
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.