Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs Rapid7 InsightVM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.2
Microsoft Defender's customer service is criticized for slow responses, but its technical support is praised for reliability and expertise.
Sentiment score
7.1
Rapid7 InsightVM customer service is praised for knowledge and professionalism but criticized for occasional delays and variable responsiveness.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.5
Customers seek reduced false positives, better report customization, and improved support for enhanced vulnerability identification on Windows 11.
Sentiment score
4.9
Rapid7 InsightVM needs integration enhancements, scalability improvements, better pricing, user experience, and modern features like mobile apps.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
9.3
Microsoft Defender is praised for its scalability, efficiently managing vulnerabilities and supporting growth across diverse industries.
Sentiment score
7.7
Rapid7 InsightVM is highly scalable, adaptable for various organization sizes, efficiently handling extensive assets, but faces report generation challenges.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
5.3
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is competitively priced, offering valuable features with P1 and P2 licenses, despite complex licensing.
Sentiment score
5.4
Rapid7 InsightVM pricing varies from $30 monthly to $100,000 annually, based on asset usage and number of IPs.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.7
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is highly stable, reliable, and almost perfectly available, often rated between eight and ten by users.
Sentiment score
8.1
Rapid7 InsightVM is praised for stability and reliability, despite minor issues, with ratings typically between seven and nine.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management provides comprehensive security features, assessments, and integrations to effectively identify and prioritize vulnerabilities.
Sentiment score
8.0
Rapid7 InsightVM excels in vulnerability scanning, integration, risk prioritization, ease of use, and cost-effective, scalable asset management.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Defender Vulnerab...
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (17th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (23rd), Microsoft Security Suite (23rd)
Rapid7 InsightVM
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
59
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is 7.2%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 InsightVM is 18.8%, up from 13.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

René-SylvainBédard - PeerSpot reviewer
The vulnerability assessment is very accurate because it runs directly into the vulnerability database
I have three years of experience with Microsoft Defender and Office 365 for eleven years. My company operates as a shop for Microsoft products, and we have always stayed with Microsoft. We intend to displace the competition when my company enters a new client environment. I have dealt with customers who were using Carbon Black and SentinelOne. My company's customers switched work from their previous products to Microsoft because the tools they were using were power-hungry solutions, which had an impact on production. Microsoft Office 365's premium licenses have many built-in services, which our customers used to use from some other products. With Microsoft products, there is no need for our company's customers to pay extra for licensing charges. The major difference between Carbon Black and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management revolves around areas like stability and integration capabilities within the operating systems, which are strong in Microsoft, especially compared to any of its competitors. The actual depth of knowledge that the platform offers is good because Microsoft has been very rigorous in documenting every single vulnerability that exists for its platform. Microsoft has the most complete list of vulnerabilities for its platform.
Shakeel Ahmad - PeerSpot reviewer
Brilliant audit report and scorecard but scans often get blocked by firewalls
The solution cannot scan third-party tools that have firewalls within them. The firewalls detect and block the solution. Conversely, Nexus is able to bypass firewalls because it has low detectability. We use Nexus when the solution cannot bypass a firewall. The solution can scan 60% of the time but Nexus can scan 90% of the time. The solution needs to improve its vulnerability design to include CVC results. Nexus has a good, long range and a good database for finding CVC numbers. We need this level of security detail but the solution does not seem to provide it.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
40%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management?
The licensing costs are reasonable. While the solution is not the cheapest, it is competitively priced and aligns with the industry average. There are no significant additional costs beyond the sta...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management?
The constant changes in the product configuration or the console setup can sometimes be challenging. They can be disruptive because we need to adjust to these changes, which can interfere with ongo...
How would you choose between Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable Nessus?
You have full visibility across cloud, network, virtual, and containerized infrastructures with Rapid7 Insight VM. You can easily prioritize vulnerabilities using attacker analytics. Overall, Rapid...
What do you like most about Rapid7 InsightVM?
The product's initial setup phase was very easy.
 

Also Known As

No data available
InsightVM, NeXpose
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
ACS, Acosta, AllianceData, amazon.com, biogen idec, CBRE, CATERPILLAR, Deloitte, COACH, GameStop, IBM
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Rapid7 InsightVM and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.