Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs Tenable Nessus comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.1
Tenable Nessus enhances security and threat management, improving visibility and preventing costly attacks, though ROI quantification is challenging.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.6
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management's support team is helpful but faces communication challenges and delays, needing improved response times.
Sentiment score
7.9
Tenable Nessus customer service is responsive and effective, though complex issues occasionally face delays; overall satisfaction is high.
My team raised multiple support tickets for the product, and we were able to get responses from Microsoft support team.
Whenever any issue arises, we contact the support, and they are always there for us.
The technical support is good yet could improve in terms of response time.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is highly rated for scalability, seamless cloud integration, and efficient vulnerability handling across industries.
Sentiment score
7.1
Tenable Nessus is scalable and adaptable, although large enterprises may face challenges with extensive data and cloud limitations.
Whether managing 50 servers today or 500 tomorrow, performance or capacity are not hindered.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Users commend Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management's stable, reliable performance, with satisfaction ratings from eight to ten over the years.
Sentiment score
8.1
Users praise Tenable Nessus's stability and reliability, with minimal issues that are easily resolved, making it highly dependable.
We have not encountered any issues with missing network items or errors in API and webhook interactions.
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Defender needs enhanced integration, simplified reporting, improved remediation, and better support for small to medium-sized businesses.
Tenable Nessus users seek improved reporting, UI, integration, vulnerability accuracy, and expanded coverage with better management, customization, and pricing.
The automated remediations can be more specific.
The documentation is not well-organized, which can be confusing when searching for solutions or specific information related to Tenable Nessus Professional.
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Defender's complex licensing and per-user cost is offset by its competitive pricing and valuable security benefits.
Tenable Nessus offers competitive pricing, appealing to smaller organizations, with pricing from $2,000 to $6,000 and no hidden fees.
Overall, every organization wishes for cheaper options, but we look at the security side as well, so we are good for now.
Tenable Nessus's pricing is adequate if it is fully utilized.
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management integrates compliance tools and insights, aiding in threat prioritization and offering a valuable security scorecard.
Tenable Nessus excels in comprehensive vulnerability management with automation, ease of integration, and cost-effective, customizable solutions.
The most valuable aspect is the kind of assessment results I get, and the recommendations provided in Microsoft products really help in taking care of the resources.
The scanning and reporting features are the most valuable aspects of Tenable Nessus.
The features I personally like include host discovery.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Defender Vulnerab...
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
18th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (22nd), Microsoft Security Suite (24th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (7th)
Tenable Nessus
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
80
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is 3.4%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Nessus is 12.6%, down from 15.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

René-SylvainBédard - PeerSpot reviewer
The vulnerability assessment is very accurate because it runs directly into the vulnerability database
I have three years of experience with Microsoft Defender and Office 365 for eleven years. My company operates as a shop for Microsoft products, and we have always stayed with Microsoft. We intend to displace the competition when my company enters a new client environment. I have dealt with customers who were using Carbon Black and SentinelOne. My company's customers switched work from their previous products to Microsoft because the tools they were using were power-hungry solutions, which had an impact on production. Microsoft Office 365's premium licenses have many built-in services, which our customers used to use from some other products. With Microsoft products, there is no need for our company's customers to pay extra for licensing charges. The major difference between Carbon Black and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management revolves around areas like stability and integration capabilities within the operating systems, which are strong in Microsoft, especially compared to any of its competitors. The actual depth of knowledge that the platform offers is good because Microsoft has been very rigorous in documenting every single vulnerability that exists for its platform. Microsoft has the most complete list of vulnerabilities for its platform.
Matthew Weisler - PeerSpot reviewer
Unlimited assets for one price and quick, agentless results
The solution has a single price for unlimited assets. Value wise, the solution is also great for pen testers and consultants. The solution is useful for vulnerability and patch management from both the internal and public facing sides. Quick assessments, compliance scores, and results are provided without having to do agents.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
40%
Computer Software Company
9%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management?
The licensing costs are reasonable. While the solution is not the cheapest, it is competitively priced and aligns with the industry average. There are no significant additional costs beyond the sta...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management?
The constant changes in the product configuration or the console setup can sometimes be challenging. They can be disruptive because we need to adjust to these changes, which can interfere with ongo...
How would you choose between Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable Nessus?
You have full visibility across cloud, network, virtual, and containerized infrastructures with Rapid7 Insight VM. You can easily prioritize vulnerabilities using attacker analytics. Overall, Rapid...
What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?
Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation t...
What do you like most about Tenable Nessus?
We have around 500 virtual machines. Therefore, we conduct monthly scans and open tickets for our developers to address identified vulnerabilities. These scans cover the servers, other network equi...
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Bitbrains, Tesla, Just Eat, Crosskey Banking Solutions, Covenant Health, Youngstown State University
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Tenable Nessus and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.