Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs Tenable Nessus comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.2
Microsoft Defender's customer service is criticized for slow responses, but its technical support is praised for reliability and expertise.
Sentiment score
7.6
Tenable Nessus support is responsive and helpful, though users note response time variability and desire clearer API documentation.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.5
Customers seek reduced false positives, better report customization, and improved support for enhanced vulnerability identification on Windows 11.
Sentiment score
5.6
Tenable Nessus requires enhancements in reporting, cloud integration, device support, automation, and security features for enterprise optimization.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
9.3
Microsoft Defender is praised for its scalability, efficiently managing vulnerabilities and supporting growth across diverse industries.
Sentiment score
6.6
Tenable Nessus is scalable for small to medium users, but large users may face challenges with data and bandwidth.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
5.3
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is competitively priced, offering valuable features with P1 and P2 licenses, despite complex licensing.
Sentiment score
6.4
Tenable Nessus offers competitive pricing with flexible licensing and discounts, praised for its value despite occasional cost concerns.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.7
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is highly stable, reliable, and almost perfectly available, often rated between eight and ten by users.
Sentiment score
7.5
Tenable Nessus is stable and reliable, with users appreciating its consistent performance despite minor configuration and update issues.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management provides comprehensive security features, assessments, and integrations to effectively identify and prioritize vulnerabilities.
Sentiment score
8.0
Tenable Nessus is valued for its thorough vulnerability detection, user-friendly interface, fast scanning, and affordable, reliable security management.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Defender Vulnerab...
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
17th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (23rd), Microsoft Security Suite (23rd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (6th)
Tenable Nessus
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
78
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is 3.3%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Nessus is 13.2%, down from 16.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

René-SylvainBédard - PeerSpot reviewer
The vulnerability assessment is very accurate because it runs directly into the vulnerability database
I have three years of experience with Microsoft Defender and Office 365 for eleven years. My company operates as a shop for Microsoft products, and we have always stayed with Microsoft. We intend to displace the competition when my company enters a new client environment. I have dealt with customers who were using Carbon Black and SentinelOne. My company's customers switched work from their previous products to Microsoft because the tools they were using were power-hungry solutions, which had an impact on production. Microsoft Office 365's premium licenses have many built-in services, which our customers used to use from some other products. With Microsoft products, there is no need for our company's customers to pay extra for licensing charges. The major difference between Carbon Black and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management revolves around areas like stability and integration capabilities within the operating systems, which are strong in Microsoft, especially compared to any of its competitors. The actual depth of knowledge that the platform offers is good because Microsoft has been very rigorous in documenting every single vulnerability that exists for its platform. Microsoft has the most complete list of vulnerabilities for its platform.
Matthew Weisler - PeerSpot reviewer
Unlimited assets for one price and quick, agentless results
The solution has a single price for unlimited assets. Value wise, the solution is also great for pen testers and consultants. The solution is useful for vulnerability and patch management from both the internal and public facing sides. Quick assessments, compliance scores, and results are provided without having to do agents.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
39%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management?
The licensing costs are reasonable. While the solution is not the cheapest, it is competitively priced and aligns with the industry average. There are no significant additional costs beyond the sta...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management?
The constant changes in the product configuration or the console setup can sometimes be challenging. They can be disruptive because we need to adjust to these changes, which can interfere with ongo...
How would you choose between Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable Nessus?
You have full visibility across cloud, network, virtual, and containerized infrastructures with Rapid7 Insight VM. You can easily prioritize vulnerabilities using attacker analytics. Overall, Rapid...
What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?
Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation t...
What do you like most about Tenable Nessus?
We have around 500 virtual machines. Therefore, we conduct monthly scans and open tickets for our developers to address identified vulnerabilities. These scans cover the servers, other network equi...
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Bitbrains, Tesla, Just Eat, Crosskey Banking Solutions, Covenant Health, Youngstown State University
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Tenable Nessus and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.