We performed a comparison between Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution helps identify threats and vulnerabilities."
"One valuable feature is the Microsoft Security Scorecard."
"The product's stability is very high...The scalability of the product is amazing."
"The solution is up-to-date and helps prevent zero-day attacks."
"The product’s most valuable features are compliance, recommendations, and inventories."
"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The solution is easy to use and configuration is smooth with no complexities."
"One of the most valuable features of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is its exportability, which allows us to conduct risk assessments efficiently."
"I would rate Tenable's dashboards and reporting capabilities for illustrating security posture a nine out of ten, with ten being the best."
"The interface is fine."
"The solution creates vulnerability tickets within the VM profile but should also include them under the Remediation tab so the fixes can be viewed in the ticketing queue."
"They are on a good trajectory as a company and investing in R&D in the right ways."
"The initial setup is straightforward so long as your infrastructure, components, and networks are in place."
"It is challenging to extract and customize reports from the system."
"Integration can be improved."
"The general support could be improved."
"The setup phase of the product is not that easy and needs a person to have a certain level of expertise."
"The technical support takes too much time to resolve tickets."
"They need to have more dependable and faster support."
"The reporting was never great in Tenable Vulnerability Management, so, in my company, we imported all the data into Ivanti RiskSense to start using it for reporting."
"I don't recommend Tenable.io Vulnerability Management for web scanning"
"The solution seems to focus too much on enterprises, and they really need a product that works for SMBs."
"Tenable could improve visibility into assets, including automated asset tagging. You should be able to automatically tag assets based on location, function, ownership, etc. That would help us because we spend a lot of time identifying and tagging assets by hand."
"The solution must provide penetration testing."
"More flexibility is required compared to other solutions."
"The price could be lower."
More Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is ranked 23rd in Vulnerability Management with 5 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management writes "The vulnerability assessment is very accurate because it runs directly into the vulnerability database". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Sentinel and Microsoft Defender XDR, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Rapid7 InsightVM. See our Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors and best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.