Tenable Security Center vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

Tenable Security Center and Tenable Vulnerability Management are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Tenable Security Center is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.9. Tenable Security Center holds a 5.7% mindshare in VM, compared to Tenable Vulnerability Management’s 6.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Tenable Security Center users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Tenable Vulnerability Management users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 16, 2025

Tenable Security Center and Tenable Vulnerability Management compete in the vulnerability management category. Tenable Security Center seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive asset management and reporting capabilities, vital for large enterprise environments.

Features: Tenable Security Center provides a valuable Assurance Report Card for real-time security posture insights, a robust dashboard for threat landscape assessment, and extensive asset management features. Tenable Vulnerability Management offers flexible policy creation, wide integration capabilities, including cloud environments, and a predictive prioritization feature that assists in risk management.

Room for Improvement: Tenable Security Center could improve in report flexibility, web application scanning, and integration with custom configurations. Tenable Vulnerability Management needs better support for detailed vulnerability analysis, report customization, and integration enhancements in penetration testing and risk management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable Security Center is primarily on-premises with hybrid-cloud options, providing steady technical support, albeit with occasional delays. Tenable Vulnerability Management is adaptable across public, private, and hybrid clouds, offering an agile deployment strategy with overall prompt customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Tenable Security Center is more expensive, justified by its asset-based licensing and comprehensive features, providing significant ROI through asset management and vulnerability reduction. Tenable Vulnerability Management's flexible cloud-based deployment caters to modern needs despite its high cost, also delivering considerable ROI by reducing manpower requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Zafran Security is 0.4%. The mindshare of Tenable Security Center is 5.7%, down from 11.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Vulnerability Management is 6.9%, down from 9.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini

Associate Director IT Security Operations at Novartis

Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions

I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.

Read full review

OndrejKOVAC

Solution engineer at EXPERTience

Empower clients with risk-based vulnerability management through continuous workflow and valuable insights

Tenable Security Center could improve by implementing more dynamic data displays and translating reports into European languages. This is especially relevant in Central Eastern Europe, where clients often require reports in local languages. Additionally, the licensing model could be more flexible for managed security providers, similar to a pay-as-you-go model.

Read full review

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Streamlines vulnerability management with excellent reporting and potential AI integration

Tenable is user-friendly and excels in reporting. It allows me to easily fetch and schedule reports. The software's discovery feature aids in strengthening our security posture. The single-sensor installation process on various operating systems is smooth, unlike Rapid7, which requires different versions for separate systems. Furthermore, Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"We are able to see the real risk of a vulnerability on our environment with our security tools."

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"The most important features are the dashboard and reporting. The dashboard provides statistics with graphs and bar charts for our management."

"I like Tenable.sc's analytics and reporting. You can also configure your on-prem network monitors to talk to your Tenable.sc control panel."

"The predictive prioritization features are pretty good. They do a lot of research and we trust the research that they do internally. They have knowledge of what's going on with many companies, where we only get a view into what's going on here. So the ability to get best practices out of them as part of this solution, is valuable to us."

"We use Tenable to scan all of our environments and plugins for vulnerabilities. Tenable helps us discover network vulnerabilities to threats and piracy."

"This solution has a much lower rate of false positives compared to competing products."

"The usability is really good. It's very easy to use and a good platform. It is scalable and very stable. The technical support is fine and the setup is super easy."

"The scanning part, the agent part – that's the valuable aspect."

"The scans are the most valuable aspect of this solution."

More Tenable Security Center pros

"I would rate Tenable's dashboards and reporting capabilities for illustrating security posture a nine out of ten, with ten being the best."

"It helps us create remediation projects and assign the console’s responsibility to specific engineers."

"You can customize each point in new scans."

"The vulnerability management itself is the most valuable feature as well as references to the mitigation techniques."

"It is very stable, and it is updated periodically by adding new vulnerabilities."

"Tenable is user-friendly and excels in reporting."

"It has greatly impacted us by providing asset visibility."

"The initial setup is straightforward so long as your infrastructure, components, and networks are in place."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pros

Cons

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"We would like to see the inclusion of external IPs and simplified reporting that's easier to deal with"

"We are facing some challenges related to our channel."

"It could be more user-friendly for creating custom reports."

"Though the solution's technical support is responsive, they do take a lot of time, making it one of the solution's shortcomings that needs improvement."

"It's important for Tenable to catch up on testing capabilities that are present in solutions like Qualys."

"Its reporting can be improved. It is not easy to generate a scan report the way we want. The data is okay, but we can't easily change the template to make it look the way we want."

"A good plugin editor would be a good additional option for the Security Center."

"The web application is not very functional."

More Tenable Security Center cons

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"The solution is a bit slow."

"It would be helpful if Tenable could be more clear with regard to everything the solution can and cannot do with the particular license that you have."

"The user interface could be improved by being able to change the user interface to fit your position or your job. The graphs are set in stone and you can only print reports."

"Technical support from Tenable is rated six out of ten. It needs improvement in response time and addressing feature requests promptly."

"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management could be improved with an increased number of dashboards and MSSP integration."

"I would like the solution to cover the whole cycle of mitigation since it's an area where the solution currently lacks."

"They need to have more dependable and faster support."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I rate the solution's price as seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The tool is quite expensive."

"The pricing is more than Nexpose."

"I would rate the pricing a nine out of ten, where ten is expensive. It is the most expensive tool my company is using."

"The tool costs around 15,000 Saudi riyals monthly."

"Tenable.sc is more expensive than its competitors."

"Costing is pretty reasonable compared to the competition."

"My company needs to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs. The pricing of the solution falls in the mid-range level, so it is not too expensive"

"The licensing costs for this solution are approximately $100,000 US, and I think that covers everything."

More Tenable Security Center pricing and cost advice

"The total cost we pay for this solution is over 45K. This is for a large education organization."

"Yearly payments are to be made toward the licensing cost of the product. It is neither a cheap nor an expensive product."

"The tool is reasonably priced."

"The product costs us around $137,000 annually for 4000 to 5000 assets."

"Compared to other VM solutions, Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is expensive."

"Tenable charges around $40 per device."

"There are additional features that can be licensed for an additional cost."

"Tenable.io is not known for being a cheap product."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Educational Organization

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Educational Organization

26%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

I find that the pricing for Zafran aligns well with the comprehensive features it offers. The asset and user-based li...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

While Zafran Security is already a powerful tool, there are areas where it could be further improved to provide even ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

Our primary use case for Zafran involves leveraging it to enhance our vulnerability risk scoring methodology. In toda...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable SC?

The tool's dashboard and reporting capabilities match our company's needs since we are able to modify the basic view ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable SC?

Tenable Security Center is quite expensive, particularly for the CEE region, causing us to lose cases due to its pric...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable SC?

Tenable Security Center could improve by implementing more dynamic data displays and translating reports into Europea...

See all answers

What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

The tool has an easy-to-use interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

I would suggest HP WebInspect as a better option than Tenable.io. My current client doesn't have access to it. Howeve...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz Code vs Zafran Security

Compared 54% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 22% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Zafran Security

Compared 15% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 12% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 11% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 10% of the time

The NodeZero Platform vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 7% of the time

Tanium vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 6% of the time

More Tenable Security Center Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 23% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 5% of the time

Snyk vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

March 2025

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Security Center

March 2025

Download Tenable Security Center product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Vulnerability Management

March 2025

Download Tenable Vulnerability Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tenable.sc, Tenable Unified Security, Tenable SecurityCenter

Tenable.io

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

Get a risk-based view of your IT, security and compliance posture so you can quickly identify, investigate and prioritize your most critical assets and vulnerabilities.

Managed on-premises and powered by Nessus technology, the Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) suite of products provides the industry’s most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your network. It’s your complete end-to-end vulnerability management solution.

Tenable

Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

IBM, Sempra Energy, Microsoft, Apple, Adidas, Union Pacific

Global Payments AU/NZ

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

April 2025

Free Report: Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors and best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.