Tenable Security Center vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

Tenable Security Center and Tenable Vulnerability Management are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Tenable Security Center is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.9. Additionally, 96% of Tenable Security Center users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Tenable Vulnerability Management users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 16, 2025

Tenable Security Center and Tenable Vulnerability Management compete in the vulnerability management category. Tenable Security Center seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive asset management and reporting capabilities, vital for large enterprise environments.

Features: Tenable Security Center provides a valuable Assurance Report Card for real-time security posture insights, a robust dashboard for threat landscape assessment, and extensive asset management features. Tenable Vulnerability Management offers flexible policy creation, wide integration capabilities, including cloud environments, and a predictive prioritization feature that assists in risk management.

Room for Improvement: Tenable Security Center could improve in report flexibility, web application scanning, and integration with custom configurations. Tenable Vulnerability Management needs better support for detailed vulnerability analysis, report customization, and integration enhancements in penetration testing and risk management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable Security Center is primarily on-premises with hybrid-cloud options, providing steady technical support, albeit with occasional delays. Tenable Vulnerability Management is adaptable across public, private, and hybrid clouds, offering an agile deployment strategy with overall prompt customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Tenable Security Center is more expensive, justified by its asset-based licensing and comprehensive features, providing significant ROI through asset management and vulnerability reduction. Tenable Vulnerability Management's flexible cloud-based deployment caters to modern needs despite its high cost, also delivering considerable ROI by reducing manpower requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 844,944 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini

Associate Director IT Security Operations at Novartis

Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions

I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.

Read full review

OndrejKOVAC

Solution engineer at EXPERTience

Empower clients with risk-based vulnerability management through continuous workflow and valuable insights

Tenable Security Center could improve by implementing more dynamic data displays and translating reports into European languages. This is especially relevant in Central Eastern Europe, where clients often require reports in local languages. Additionally, the licensing model could be more flexible for managed security providers, similar to a pay-as-you-go model.

Read full review

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Streamlines vulnerability management with excellent reporting and potential AI integration

Tenable is user-friendly and excels in reporting. It allows me to easily fetch and schedule reports. The software's discovery feature aids in strengthening our security posture. The single-sensor installation process on various operating systems is smooth, unlike Rapid7, which requires different versions for separate systems. Furthermore, Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"Overall, I rate the solution 9.8 out of 10."

"The most valuable feature is the automatic and periodic management of security scans, along with the ability to consolidate all information into a single dashboard."

"The feature we've liked most recently was being able to take the YARA rules from FireEye and put them into Tenable's scan for the most recent SolarWinds exploit. That was really useful."

"Support is knowledgeable."

"The tool gives us fewer false positives. Compared to its competitors, the solution’s reports are more accurate."

"It allows financial institutions to compare their vulnerability management to others in the same sector."

"I found the dashboard features very useful. It made it easy to track remediation progress. I could publish dashboards to remediation teams and track the progress on the dashboards."

"Their overall cost of service is pretty good."

More Tenable Security Center pros

"The solution's most valuable feature is providing a single pane of visibility on all the infrastructure and its status."

"They are on a good trajectory as a company and investing in R&D in the right ways."

"The ease of use in terms of scanning assets is valuable."

"Tenable.io, in particular, is quite a powerful product. It looks at your traditional environment, which is pretty much anything that is on-premises, and it also goes a step ahead and covers your modern assets, which is anything that is currently sitting in the cloud. You get complete visibility of your entire environment and tech operation. The ability to give you visibility across the entire tech surface is one of the biggest advantages that Tenable.io has."

"The solution is quite friendly."

"The stability is commendable, and I would rate Tenable ten out of ten."

"It helps us create remediation projects and assign the console’s responsibility to specific engineers."

"The initial setup is mostly straightforward."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pros

Cons

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"Tenable has some problems with agents going offline during scanning and lag between agents and the security center."

"Support could be faster."

"Though the solution's technical support is responsive, they do take a lot of time, making it one of the solution's shortcomings that needs improvement."

"In terms of configuration, there is some level of flexibility that we are not able to achieve."

"The solution should provide better web application features and support."

"The web application is not very functional."

"Tenable's technical support has declined in quality over time. While they used to be excellent, achieving ratings of eight or nine, they now rate around six or seven due to longer response times and less thorough assistance."

"The GUI could be improved to have all concerns and priorities use the same GUI, allowing them to see all tickets, assign vulnerabilities, and assign variation failures to each member of their team."

More Tenable Security Center cons

"An area of improvement for this solution is being able to customize the dashboard. For example, the dashboard does not allow us to view a previous months vulnerability results alongside current results to make comparisons."

"They should include better customization of the dashboard, and integration tools."

"It's not a user-friendly tool since it has a complicated interface."

"The product is a bit expensive."

"The reporting was never great in Tenable Vulnerability Management, so, in my company, we imported all the data into Ivanti RiskSense to start using it for reporting."

"They need to have more dependable and faster support."

"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management could be improved with an increased number of dashboards and MSSP integration."

"They've been able to think about everything in terms of where the world is going and the type of assets that you've got. They've everything sorted out in that aspect, but you have to pay for most of the other components that they've got to give you complete visibility across your tech surface. If it already had those capabilities in-built, without having to add them on to take advantage of them, it would be a very compelling value proposition."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Tenable.sc is more expensive than its competitors."

"It is a bit expensive. Everything is included in the license."

"Tenable is open-source."

"The tool provides competitive pricing."

"We're a Fortune 500 company... our licensing costs [are] in the seven figures."

"The price of Tenable SC is expensive, we pay approximately €70,000 for the license annually. We have to pay for each IP test. The cost of other solutions is far less, such as Nessus Professional, which is €3,000 annually."

"For 500 users the licensing fee is roughly $100,000."

"Tenable SC is priced per asset, with the basic solution starting around US$12,000 for 500 assets."

More Tenable Security Center pricing and cost advice

"The product costs us around $137,000 annually for 4000 to 5000 assets."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high price, I rate the pricing an eight. So, it is a pretty expensive solution."

"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management's pricing solution model isn't great."

"The cost is determined by the number of endpoints, which is approximately one dollar per endpoint."

"The tool is reasonably priced."

"The solution is not too expensive."

"Tenable.io is not known for being a cheap product."

"Compared to other VM solutions, Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is expensive."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

Retailer

Educational Organization

21%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Educational Organization

30%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

Pricing for Zafran Security is not expensive. We have a contract for five years, and the cost is lower than other too...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

I would like to see an integration with Check Point firewalls. It's essential for us and they are currently working o...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

We use Zafran Security for threat prioritization. We establish priority to understand which risks should be patched o...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable SC?

The tool's dashboard and reporting capabilities match our company's needs since we are able to modify the basic view ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable SC?

Tenable Security Center is quite expensive, particularly for the CEE region, causing us to lose cases due to its pric...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable SC?

Tenable Security Center could improve by implementing more dynamic data displays and translating reports into Europea...

See all answers

What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

The tool has an easy-to-use interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

I would suggest HP WebInspect as a better option than Tenable.io. My current client doesn't have access to it. Howeve...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dazz.io vs Zafran Security

Compared 53% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 21% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Zafran Security

Compared 17% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 12% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 11% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 10% of the time

The NodeZero Platform vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 7% of the time

Tanium vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 6% of the time

More Tenable Security Center Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 24% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 5% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

Snyk vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

March 2025

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Security Center

March 2025

Download Tenable Security Center product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Vulnerability Management

March 2025

Download Tenable Vulnerability Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tenable.sc, Tenable Unified Security, Tenable SecurityCenter

Tenable.io

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

Get a risk-based view of your IT, security and compliance posture so you can quickly identify, investigate and prioritize your most critical assets and vulnerabilities.

Managed on-premises and powered by Nessus technology, the Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) suite of products provides the industry’s most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your network. It’s your complete end-to-end vulnerability management solution.

Tenable

Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

IBM, Sempra Energy, Microsoft, Apple, Adidas, Union Pacific

Global Payments AU/NZ

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

February 2025

Free Report: Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors and best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.