Top 10 Tenable Security Center Alternatives

4.1 out of 5

54 reviews
96% willing to recommend

1,706 followers

Top Tenable Security Center Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Tenable Security Center based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Tenable Security Center surpasses its competitors by offering advanced vulnerability management, comprehensive asset discovery, and real-time analytics to improve security posture, making it a preferred choice for businesses seeking proactive cybersecurity solutions.

Tenable Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Tenable, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Qualys VMDR

4.2 out of 5

Qualys VMDR

4.2 out of 5

Qualys VMDR excels with vulnerability management and seamless updates, ideal for comprehensive security. In comparison, Tenable Security Center emphasizes robust vulnerability scanning with strategic risk management priorities. Both offer significant ROI, but Tenable may be more cost-effective for larger enterprises.

Download Qualys VMDR vs. Tenable Security Center Report

Pricing

Qualys VMDR typically has lower setup costs, providing cost efficiency for smaller teams, while Tenable Security Center may involve higher initial investments, accommodating more extensive networks and larger enterprise needs, emphasizing distinctions in their pricing structures.

View comparison

Pricing

Rapid7 InsightVM

4.0 out of 5

Rapid7 InsightVM

4.0 out of 5

Tenable Security Center offers extensive vulnerability scanning for adaptability and detailed insights, favored in large-scale environments. In comparison, Rapid7 InsightVM excels with straightforward risk scoring and seamless integration with tools like JIRA, suiting development cycles and cloud-based deployments.

Download Rapid7 InsightVM vs. Tenable Security Center Report

Pricing

Tenable Security Center has a higher initial setup cost, while Rapid7 InsightVM offers a lower setup cost.

View comparison

Pricing

Tenable Security Center has a higher initial setup cost, while Rapid7 InsightVM offers a lower setup cost.

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management

4.0 out of 5

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management

4.0 out of 5

Tenable Security Center is appealing due to robust features and budget-friendly pricing. In comparison, Microsoft Defender's extensive integration within Microsoft's ecosystem offers advanced threat intelligence, providing long-term value. Tenable excels in adaptability, while Microsoft Defender ensures ease of deployment for existing Microsoft users.

Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Tenable Security Center Report

Pricing

Tenable Security Center has competitive setup costs, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers a more straightforward installation process. Tenable requires more initial investment, whereas Microsoft aims for a cost-effective entry with less complexity.

View comparison

Pricing

Armis

4.3 out of 5

Armis

4.3 out of 5

Tenable Security Center provides robust vulnerability management tailored for traditional IT environments with cost-effective deployment. In comparison, Armis offers superior IoT device visibility, making it advantageous for tech-forward organizations investing in emerging technologies despite higher initial costs.

Download Armis vs. Tenable Security Center Report

Pricing

Tenable Security Center incurs significant setup costs, often higher compared to Armis, which offers a more streamlined and cost-effective initial setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Tenable Security Center incurs significant setup costs, often higher compared to Armis, which offers a more streamlined and cost-effective initial setup.

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

4.0 out of 5

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

4.0 out of 5

Cisco Vulnerability Management equips you with the contextual insight and threat intelligence needed to intercept the next exploit and respond with precision.

Pricing

I think the pricing is based on the number of endpoints, so it's more subscription-based.

View comparison

Pricing

I think the pricing is based on the number of endpoints, so it's more subscription-based.

Brinqa

3.5 out of 5

Brinqa

3.5 out of 5

Brinqa offers comprehensive risk management with valuable features like threat intelligence integration and customizable workflows. Users praise its analytics but mention room for improvement in ease of use and scalability. Brinqa's focus on security applications can enhance decision-making for organizations.

View comparison

Unified Vulnerability Management

1 out of 5

Unified Vulnerability Management

1 out of 5

Tenable Security Center offers feature-rich solutions with comprehensive insights and integration, attracting those prioritizing robust analysis. In comparison, Unified Vulnerability Management delivers ease of deployment and cost-effectiveness, appealing to buyers seeking quick adaptation and immediate ROI with lower initial investment.

Pricing

Tenable Security Center has a higher setup cost compared to Unified Vulnerability Management, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

View comparison

Pricing

Tenable Security Center has a higher setup cost compared to Unified Vulnerability Management, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

SecureWorks Taegis VDR

4.5 out of 5

SecureWorks Taegis VDR

4.5 out of 5

Automate vulnerability management with a cloud-based, machine learning-powered solution. Intelligently prioritize remediation efforts based on actionable recommendations that reflect the context of your environment.

View comparison

CYRISMA

1 out of 5

CYRISMA

1 out of 5

CYRISMA offers cybersecurity risk management features like risk assessment and asset management. Users find its dashboard intuitive, simplifying complex security tasks. It could improve by expanding integration options, which would enhance its flexibility in diverse tech environments.

View comparison

Related categories

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

Vulnerability Management

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)