Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Armis vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.9
Tenable's support is responsive but costly, with mixed reviews on response times, effectiveness, and documentation access issues noted.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
4.3
Tenable Vulnerability Management needs interface improvements, better reporting, clearer licensing, and enhanced user-friendly features for small businesses.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.3
Tenable Vulnerability Management is highly scalable and widely used, especially in finance and public sectors, with flexible cloud-based solutions.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.5
Tenable Vulnerability Management is considered expensive with asset-based pricing, prompting users to seek cost-effective, flexible payment options.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.1
Tenable Vulnerability Management is reliable and stable, highly rated by users despite occasional minor network-related issues.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.1
Tenable excels in vulnerability management with a user-friendly interface, robust scanning, seamless integration, and comprehensive risk prioritization.
 

Categories and Ranking

Armis
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
IoT Security (3rd), Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (3rd), Cyber-Physical Systems Protection (2nd)
Tenable Vulnerability Manag...
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Armis is 2.7%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Vulnerability Management is 28.9%, down from 37.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

Arun Chauhan - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides a very good vulnerability monitoring system, but the implementation is challenging
We face many issues while implementing Armis in the pharma sector. Some of the customer applications are not supported well by the tool. The applications do not communicate well if we implement Armis. We generally face such issues during implementation. We are planning to implement the product in the wind energy sector, but we don't have any idea how to do it. Currently, it is a very big challenge for us. Products like Dragos, Claroty, and Nozomi provide a much better experience during implementation. If any issues arise, we are told how to resolve such issues during the POC. Armis does not provide the secure remote access feature Claroty provides.
Yogeswaran Neelagandan - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers risk prioritization , notification system but support should be bundled with the product cost
It's a fantastic product, but there are some things to consider. One is the price. Compared to on-prem solutions, the SaaS model can be expensive. Price is definitely a concern and needs improvement, especially for the Indian market. While it's a fantastic product, it should be more accessible to small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs). Currently, only larger enterprises seem to be able to afford and evaluate it thoroughly. So, pricing can be improved and be more affordable for the Indian market, specifically for SMBs. Another area of improvement is customer service and support. Tenable needs to include support in the pricing/license. Currently, they push clients to get support from partners or channel distributors, who often charge a lot. Even for a simple one-time setup, they may charge three to four lakhs, and then additional annual charges for ongoing support. We have the technical skills to handle basic tasks, but relying on Tenable itself often results in just receiving emails or being redirected back to channel partners. So, support should be bundled with the product cost.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
14%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Educational Organization
30%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Armis?
Armis is a straightforward and user-friendly solution.
What needs improvement with Armis?
There isn't anything specific that needs improvement.
What is your primary use case for Armis?
I used it for asset management in my cybersecurity training program called CyberNow Labs. It was used during security operations and investigations to identify assets within our CNL network and to ...
What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?
Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation t...
What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?
It needs additional reporting and intelligence features, as well as enhancements in AI-driven detection, which is still in its early stages.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Tenable.io
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Samsung Research America, IDT Corporation, Gett
Global Payments AU/NZ
Find out what your peers are saying about Armis vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.