Armis vs Axonius comparison

Read 6 Axonius reviews

1,339 Views
1,019 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Armis

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Armis and Axonius compete in the cybersecurity landscape, focusing on asset management and security. Armis seems to have the upper hand in identifying and monitoring unmanaged devices, while Axonius is favored for its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Armis provides detailed visibility into unmanaged and IoT devices, asset tracking, and improved device visibility. Axonius offers rich integration with various security tools, deduplication of records, and extensive data correlation capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Armis could enhance its integration capabilities with more platforms, offer more advanced customization options, and improve its reporting features. Axonius might benefit from streamlining its setup process, enhancing query customization ease, and reducing dependency on specific API sources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Armis is recognized for its straightforward deployment process, allowing quick integration into existing systems. Axonius requires a more involved setup but offers extensive documentation and proactive customer service support.

Pricing and ROI: Armis generally offers a lower initial setup cost, making it appealing to organizations with budget constraints. Despite higher upfront expenses, Axonius often demonstrates superior long-term ROI through expansive features and integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Armis vs. Axonius Report (Updated: March 2025).

Armis vs. Axonius

Download the complete report

Helped 842,651 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Armis

Ranking in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IoT Security (3rd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (9th), Cyber-Physical Systems Protection (2nd)

Axonius

Ranking in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Vendor Risk Management (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) category, the mindshare of Armis is 23.8%, up from 6.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Axonius is 36.0%, down from 42.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

Featured Reviews

Arun Chauhan

Assistant Lead OT Security Engineer at Vestas

Provides a very good vulnerability monitoring system, but the implementation is challenging

We face many issues while implementing Armis in the pharma sector. Some of the customer applications are not supported well by the tool. The applications do not communicate well if we implement Armis. We generally face such issues during implementation. We are planning to implement the product in the wind energy sector, but we don't have any idea how to do it. Currently, it is a very big challenge for us. Products like Dragos, Claroty, and Nozomi provide a much better experience during implementation. If any issues arise, we are told how to resolve such issues during the POC. Armis does not provide the secure remote access feature Claroty provides.

Read full review

Kirubakaran Jayakumar

Cyber Security Analyst at Smurfit Kappa

Agentless and can easily integrate with other platforms and provides robust API monitoring capabilities

Axonius can improve on delivering compliance-related features, like PCI DSS, and different dashboards that work with various compliances. For example, if a company follows ISO, they can create a dashboard that shows the gaps within that compliance framework. They have started delivering some of these features, but the tool still needs to mature for companies that heavily rely on certain standards, like payment compliances or cloud security guidelines. In those cases, the tool might need further development. However, I haven’t had specific issues because they are really good at fixing things. Whenever we report or escalate something, they are quick in providing solutions. I think they are very flexible in terms of working with them. But at the same time, they are customizing the solution too much based on client requirements. This might cause issues in the future because if they keep customizing the solution for every single client’s requirement, they might face difficulties in future releases. Integrating every customer’s options within the platform might be challenging to handle. That might be a risk they are taking. But we have had good communication with them, and overall, it’s been positive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Armis is very easy to implement due to its agentless design and offers a granular level of visibility for all assets in the network."

"The initial setup and deployment were simple."

"Armis is very easy to implement due to its agentless design and offers a granular level of visibility for all assets in the network."

"The solution’s vulnerability monitoring system is very good."

"The tool is user-friendly and helps to detect vulnerabilities."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is asset tracking."

"Armis is a straightforward and user-friendly solution."

"It determines which assets and devices are at risk, alerts you if there's a risk, and categorizes all assets, including personal computers, mobile phones, servers, televisions, cars, and video game consoles."

More Armis pros

"Axonius provides preconfigured dashboards that can be customized to your needs."

"The solution's technical support was good...The product's initial setup phase is pretty straightforward."

"he best feature I found in Axonius is that it shows us the duration of eCheck, and it shows us what device is down and in which part of the system life cycle or the checking part the system is down in."

"The automation capabilities in Axonius have streamlined our security operations."

"I like that the tool has a user-friendly interface. It helps organizations and big companies improve business requirements and control processes."

Cons

"The solution's vulnerability testing could be improved."

"Like any IT tool, continuous learning and improvement are essential for the solution."

"There isn't anything specific that needs improvement."

"We face difficulties in integrating the product with ticketing tools like ServiceNow."

"Armis could improve its geographic spread and marketing campaigns across regions."

"Armis doesn't have a back intel feature."

"We face issues during implementation."

"We have faced issues with the tool's stability."

"We can have fetch cycle issues."

"Axonius can improve on delivering compliance-related features."

"Regarding the improvement of Axonius, it goes halfway for both the tool and the user. If we set it up quickly from our end, and if the AD groups and all other groups assigned to tag the assets have been tagged correctly, Axonius could not show an error."

"For us, the product's deployment phase was a little challenging because we had to deal with other departments and business units."

"Adding more detailed descriptions or YouTube videos about specific features would help improve the application."

"For Axonius, I would suggest supporting more ticketing platforms and enhancing API integration directly into the platform rather than just the connector. This would allow for better integration from different systems, possibly into workflows, which I think is currently lacking."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is cheap."

"We are on a subscription model with them."

"Axonius is quite a bit cheaper compared to other solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Armis?

Armis is a straightforward and user-friendly solution.

What needs improvement with Armis?

Armis could improve its geographic spread and marketing campaigns across regions.

What is your primary use case for Armis?

Armis is a cloud-based SaaS solution designed specifically for manufacturing environments, especially for companies implementing Industry 4.0. My primary use is in network-based security, offering ...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axonius?

Axonius is quite a bit cheaper compared to other solutions. And the amount of value they provide is really huge compared to other vendors. So, it’s based on the actual requirement and how you want ...

What needs improvement with Axonius?

What is your primary use case for Axonius?

We use it for reporting, noncompliance reporting, and identifying gaps. We use it for API monitoring within our company. And we also use it as a CMDB. Our security team, people within the SOC team,...

Claroty Platform vs Armis

Comparisons

Nozomi Networks vs Armis

Compared 18% of the time

Compared 18% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Armis

Compared 7% of the time

runZero vs Armis

Compared 5% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Armis

Compared 5% of the time

More Armis Competitors

ServiceNow vs Axonius

Compared 20% of the time

runZero vs Axonius

Compared 11% of the time

JupiterOne vs Axonius

Compared 9% of the time

Sevco vs Axonius

Compared 6% of the time

Surface Command vs Axonius

Compared 5% of the time

More Axonius Competitors

Product Reports

IoT Security

Download Armis product report

Download Axonius product report

Overview

Armis is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution used for continuous monitoring and threat detection across IT and IoT devices. It excels in spotting vulnerabilities, managing device compliance, and tracking assets to enhance security protocols and network management. Key features include real-time threat detection, comprehensive visibility, and granular risk assessments. Armis boosts organizational productivity by streamlining workflows and enhancing operational accuracy.

Armis

Axonius offers robust asset management, enhancing network visibility by consolidating data from various devices. It excels in automatic device categorization for up-to-date inventories, crucial for compliance and risk assessments. Key features include automated policy enforcement and comprehensive reporting tools, which streamline workflows and improve organizational productivity and security compliance. Integrations with other IT tools further enhance its efficiency.

Sample Customers

Samsung Research America, IDT Corporation, Gett

Extreme Engineering Solutions, AppsFlyer, Landmark Health, Natera

Armis vs. Axonius