Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Armis vs Claroty Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Armis
Ranking in Cyber-Physical Systems Protection
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
IoT Security (3rd), Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (3rd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (9th)
Claroty Platform
Ranking in Cyber-Physical Systems Protection
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (10th), Vulnerability Management (15th), Operational Technology (OT) Security (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Cyber-Physical Systems Protection category, the mindshare of Armis is 32.8%, down from 33.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Claroty Platform is 41.8%, up from 17.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cyber-Physical Systems Protection
 

Featured Reviews

Arun Chauhan - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides a very good vulnerability monitoring system, but the implementation is challenging
We face many issues while implementing Armis in the pharma sector. Some of the customer applications are not supported well by the tool. The applications do not communicate well if we implement Armis. We generally face such issues during implementation. We are planning to implement the product in the wind energy sector, but we don't have any idea how to do it. Currently, it is a very big challenge for us. Products like Dragos, Claroty, and Nozomi provide a much better experience during implementation. If any issues arise, we are told how to resolve such issues during the POC. Armis does not provide the secure remote access feature Claroty provides.
AnandKumar2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful for active coding, deep inspection of packages, and data retrieval
I appreciate the active coding, deep inspection of packages, and data retrieval. The tool covers information about assets and attack vectors, which I find superior to other tools. Based on alerts, I create reports detailing how an attacker can penetrate the plant, both externally and internally. Initially, I felt the Claroty Platform wasn't up to the mark for vulnerability management, but recent upgrades have been very helpful. The new features provide more detailed information, including CVE numbers and thorough explanations, such as for MS17-010 (WannaCry). This level of detail meets my expectations and allows me to determine how much of the plant's assets and devices would be compromised if a vulnerability is exploited. This information is crucial for reporting to the CISO.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is asset tracking."
"The solution’s vulnerability monitoring system is very good."
"It determines which assets and devices are at risk, alerts you if there's a risk, and categorizes all assets, including personal computers, mobile phones, servers, televisions, cars, and video game consoles."
"The technology is good."
"The initial setup and deployment were simple."
"The tool is user-friendly and helps to detect vulnerabilities."
"Armis is a straightforward and user-friendly solution."
"Claroty provides continuous threat protection and identifies pre-empty stuff and false positives."
"The tool's best feature was the UI and the simplicity it offers."
"I like how the tool does passive and active discovery and threat detection and shows risks, recommendations, and vulnerabilities. It gives risk scores and gathers everything in one place - IP, device name, etc. We can integrate it with other tools for overall network mapping. It's useful for audits, compliance, and monitoring of all devices in the industry. It provides both monitoring and control. We also have SRA for incident response, which lets us search all alerts if we deploy the Claroty Platform."
"The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts."
"I appreciate the active coding, deep inspection of packages, and data retrieval. The tool covers information about assets and attack vectors, which I find superior to other tools. Based on alerts, I create reports detailing how an attacker can penetrate the plant, both externally and internally."
"The solution's asset management is really great compared to Dragos or Nozomi."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the map, which shows everything that is connected and communicates with each other."
"The solution offers comprehensive tools that greatly enhance your IT operations if implemented correctly."
 

Cons

"We face issues during implementation."
"The solution's vulnerability testing could be improved."
"There isn't anything specific that needs improvement."
"Like any IT tool, continuous learning and improvement are essential for the solution."
"Armis doesn't have a back intel feature."
"We face difficulties in integrating the product with ticketing tools like ServiceNow."
"We have faced issues with the tool's stability."
"Claroty Platform could improve the pricing to get more acceptability in the market."
"The graphical user interface is quite poor."
"Claroty Platform only gives the vulnerabilities based on the make and model of the devices, so it doesn't provide any resolution or any detailed explanation of how one can resolve such issues."
"There are a few protocols that Claroty doesn't currently support."
"We face issues in the alert investigation area because it does not properly give the alert communication patterns."
"For improvement, I think the training could be more practical. We have external training, but they're mostly theoretical. I want the solution to provide hands-on lab experience to help users learn better."
"I've reported four bugs and three feature requests so far. The main area of focus should be on how attacks are detected. The attack vector information needs to be more detailed. For example, it's not enough to state that an SMB v1 version open can lead to a WannaCry attack. A more detailed explanation should help clients understand the various ways an attack could occur."
"The product could be improved in terms of user interface design."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is cheap."
"The tool is quite expensive."
"It's a bit expensive compared to other solutions."
"The licensing for physical devices is cheap, but the software version is expensive. The software version costs around 26-28 dollars. I was surprised and even double-checked. It was shocking."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cyber-Physical Systems Protection solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
14%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
15%
Energy/Utilities Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Armis?
Armis is a straightforward and user-friendly solution.
What needs improvement with Armis?
There isn't anything specific that needs improvement.
What is your primary use case for Armis?
I used it for asset management in my cybersecurity training program called CyberNow Labs. It was used during security operations and investigations to identify assets within our CNL network and to ...
Which solution do you prefer: Nozomi Networks or Claroty Platform?
Nozomi Networks and Claroty Platform are both leading operational technology (OT) security solutions offering a wide range of features, including asset discovery, risk assessment, and threat detect...
What do you like most about Claroty Platform?
The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts.
What needs improvement with Claroty Platform?
For improvement, I think the training could be more practical. We have external training, but they're mostly theoretical. I want the solution to provide hands-on lab experience to help users learn ...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Samsung Research America, IDT Corporation, Gett
Rockwell Automation
Find out what your peers are saying about Armis vs. Claroty Platform and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.