Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Claroty Platform vs Nozomi Networks comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Nozomi Networks' customer support is praised for responsiveness and proactivity, with room for improvement noted by some users.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Nozomi Networks should enhance PLC support, integration library, pricing, and offer customizable configurations with improved video presentations for proof of concept.
I would like more customizable options for configurations.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.8
Nozomi Networks is scalable for large enterprises, efficiently managing assets and extending capabilities to meet diverse business needs.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Nozomi Networks offers mid-range, cost-effective pricing with monthly options, balancing affordability and value better than Claroty.
It's not cheap, yet it is also not super expensive either.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.3
Nozomi Networks is highly rated for stability, scalability, and device visibility, with minimal support needs, especially in Italy.
The product is stable and doesn’t usually require frequent technical support interaction.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.7
Nozomi Networks excels in security, integration, and network visualization, making it ideal for OT and IoT environments.
The network visualization feature of Nozomi impacts security operations positively.
 

Categories and Ranking

Claroty Platform
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (10th), Vulnerability Management (15th), Cyber-Physical Systems Protection (1st)
Nozomi Networks
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
2nd
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
IoT Security (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Operational Technology (OT) Security category, the mindshare of Claroty Platform is 26.1%, up from 25.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nozomi Networks is 29.3%, up from 28.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Operational Technology (OT) Security
 

Q&A Highlights

Aug 27, 2023
 

Featured Reviews

AnandKumar2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful for active coding, deep inspection of packages, and data retrieval
I appreciate the active coding, deep inspection of packages, and data retrieval. The tool covers information about assets and attack vectors, which I find superior to other tools. Based on alerts, I create reports detailing how an attacker can penetrate the plant, both externally and internally. Initially, I felt the Claroty Platform wasn't up to the mark for vulnerability management, but recent upgrades have been very helpful. The new features provide more detailed information, including CVE numbers and thorough explanations, such as for MS17-010 (WannaCry). This level of detail meets my expectations and allows me to determine how much of the plant's assets and devices would be compromised if a vulnerability is exploited. This information is crucial for reporting to the CISO.
Massimiliano La Camera - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides cost saving and offers device visibility
I think it's a stable solution and don't foresee any problems in the future. It's a leading security platform and is widely used in Italy. This gives them full visibility of all devices, which is often difficult to achieve. IT managers usually lack visibility into all products and security solutions. However, this platform lets customers gain visibility of their entire device environment. I rate its stability an eight out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operational Technology (OT) Security solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
15%
Energy/Utilities Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Energy/Utilities Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which solution do you prefer: Nozomi Networks or Claroty Platform?
Nozomi Networks and Claroty Platform are both leading operational technology (OT) security solutions offering a wide range of features, including asset discovery, risk assessment, and threat detect...
What do you like most about Claroty Platform?
The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts.
What needs improvement with Claroty Platform?
For improvement, I think the training could be more practical. We have external training, but they're mostly theoretical. I want the solution to provide hands-on lab experience to help users learn ...
What do you like most about Nozomi Networks?
The most valuable feature of Nozomi Networks is its security features.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nozomi Networks?
The solution's pricing is good and cheaper than that of Claroty. Nozomi Networks is worth the money.
What needs improvement with Nozomi Networks?
Nozomi Networks should improve its pricing.
 

Also Known As

No data available
SCADAguardian
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rockwell Automation
Enel, FireEye, GlaxoSmithKline, VEC, TAGSEC Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Claroty Platform vs. Nozomi Networks and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.