Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo

Top 10 Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Alternatives

Vendor: Microsoft
4.0 out of 5
Start review

Top Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Wiz, Qualys VMDR, and Tenable Nessus. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management surpasses its competitors by offering real-time risk assessment, advanced threat intelligence, and seamless integration with existing Microsoft security tools, ensuring comprehensive protection for enterprises against evolving vulnerabilities in modern digital environments.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Wiz offers easy deployment with competitive pricing, appealing to tech buyers needing rapid cloud integration. In comparison, Microsoft Defender provides robust integration with Microsoft ecosystems, appealing to those seeking comprehensive protection despite higher costs. Wiz's simplicity contrasts with Microsoft Defender's extensive features.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Wiz Report
Wiz has a higher initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which offers a more budget-friendly option for those seeking a cost-effective solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Wiz has a higher initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which offers a more budget-friendly option for those seeking a cost-effective solution.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.2 out of 5
Qualys VMDR stands out with its asset discovery and monitoring, appealing to those seeking detailed insights. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers seamless integration with Windows, ideal for organizations leveraging Microsoft's native threat response capabilities.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Qualys VMDR Report
Qualys VMDR offers a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which requires more initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR offers a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which requires more initial investment.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Tenable Nessus
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Tenable Nessus
4.2 out of 5
Tenable Nessus offers extensive vulnerability scanning and cost-effective solutions, appealing to those needing detailed assessments. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management provides seamless integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, ideal for organizations prioritizing a comprehensive security approach within Microsoft services.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Tenable Nessus Report
Tenable Nessus has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which can make it more attractive for organizations with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable Nessus has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which can make it more attractive for organizations with budget constraints.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Tanium provides comprehensive endpoint visibility and rapid incident response. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers integration with the broader Microsoft security ecosystem. Tanium's detailed data suits complex networks, while Microsoft Defender benefits organizations already using Microsoft tools with cohesive integration.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Tanium Report
Tanium has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, highlighting a significant cost difference that may affect budgeting decisions.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, highlighting a significant cost difference that may affect budgeting decisions.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Tenable Security Center
4.1 out of 5
Tenable Security Center is appealing due to robust features and budget-friendly pricing. In comparison, Microsoft Defender's extensive integration within Microsoft's ecosystem offers advanced threat intelligence, providing long-term value. Tenable excels in adaptability, while Microsoft Defender ensures ease of deployment for existing Microsoft users.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Tenable Security Center Report
Tenable Security Center has competitive setup costs, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers a more straightforward installation process. Tenable requires more initial investment, whereas Microsoft aims for a cost-effective entry with less complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable Security Center has competitive setup costs, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers a more straightforward installation process. Tenable requires more initial investment, whereas Microsoft aims for a cost-effective entry with less complexity.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Tenable Vulnerability Management
4.0 out of 5
Tenable Vulnerability Management excels with its competitive pricing and extensive scanning and integration capabilities. In comparison, Microsoft Defender, although pricier, offers seamless integration with the Microsoft ecosystem and broad threat intelligence, appealing to organizations already embedded in Microsoft environments.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report
Tenable Vulnerability Management setup costs are high, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable Vulnerability Management setup costs are high, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
JFrog Xray
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
JFrog Xray
4.0 out of 5
JFrog Xray offers deep DevOps integration and competitive pricing, ideal for budget-conscious teams seeking granular security policies. In comparison, Microsoft Defender appeals to large organizations with comprehensive asset coverage and seamless Microsoft service integration, providing significant ROI through broad feature sets and threat intelligence.
Download JFrog Xray vs. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Report
JFrog Xray provides straightforward setup with predictable costs, whereas Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management may have a more complex initial setup that could incur higher fees.
View comparison
Pricing
JFrog Xray provides straightforward setup with predictable costs, whereas Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management may have a more complex initial setup that could incur higher fees.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Claroty Platform
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Claroty Platform
4.1 out of 5
Claroty Platform appeals to budget-conscious buyers seeking asset visibility and threat detection in operational technology environments. In comparison, Microsoft Defender suits organizations needing comprehensive features like integrated threat intelligence and automation with a higher budget. Claroty emphasizes ease and support, while Defender enhances integration and features.
Download Claroty Platform vs. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Report
Claroty Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which offers a more comprehensive initial deployment package with higher pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Claroty Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which offers a more comprehensive initial deployment package with higher pricing.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit
3.9 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit is ideal for environments needing advanced penetration testing and exploit development with significant ROI. In comparison, Microsoft Defender offers real-time threat intelligence and seamless integration, benefiting those seeking comprehensive security within Microsoft ecosystems, emphasizing integration and seamless real-time capabilities over hands-on testing.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit generally incurs a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit generally incurs a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
XM Cyber
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
XM Cyber
4.0 out of 5
XM Cyber is valued for its real-time attack path remediation, providing high network visibility and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Microsoft Defender's strength lies in its seamless integration with Microsoft's ecosystem, offering comprehensive protection and extensive features that justify its higher pricing.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. XM Cyber Report
XM Cyber offers a straightforward setup cost, whereas Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management often involves higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
XM Cyber offers a straightforward setup cost, whereas Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management often involves higher initial expenses.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Amazon Inspector
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Amazon Inspector
4.1 out of 5
Amazon Inspector appeals with scalable assessments and flexible pricing, ideal for AWS-focused organizations. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management provides in-depth analytics integrated with Microsoft 365, suiting enterprises seeking comprehensive security insights within an existing Microsoft ecosystem.
Download Amazon Inspector vs. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Report
Amazon Inspector setup costs are minimal, making it budget-friendly, whereas Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management has higher initial expenses, indicating a larger upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon Inspector setup costs are minimal, making it budget-friendly, whereas Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management has higher initial expenses, indicating a larger upfront investment.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Vicarius vRx
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Vicarius vRx
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is ideal for seamless integration within Windows environments. In comparison, Vicarius vRx offers advanced patch management and adaptability across platforms. Tech buyers favor Microsoft Defender for cost efficiency, while Vicarius vRx appeals to those prioritizing comprehensive security features.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Vicarius vRx Report
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management has a lower setup cost compared to Vicarius vRx, which may be a consideration for budget-conscious users. Vicarius vRx offers added features that could justify its higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management has a lower setup cost compared to Vicarius vRx, which may be a consideration for budget-conscious users. Vicarius vRx offers added features that could justify its higher initial investment.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Ivanti Neurons for RBVM
4.5 out of 5
Evolve your vulnerability management strategy to a risk-based approach. Ivanti Neurons for RBVM enables you to prioritize the vulnerabilities that pose the most risk to better protect against ransomware and other cyber threats.
View comparison
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Balbix BreachControl
1 out of 5
Balbix BreachControl offers advanced threat intelligence and asset management, helping users understand cyber risk. It provides valuable features like automated risk scoring and real-time threat detection. Users suggest enhancement in integration capabilities with diverse tools and improving scalability for larger environments.
View comparison
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Holm Security
1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Holm Security
1 out of 5

Holm Security is used for network vulnerability scanning, threat detection, and security insights. Users value its efficiency, compliance aid, and proactive threat detection. They highlight its comprehensive assessments, customizable reporting, easy integration, reliable customer support, and regular updates. Suggestions include improved threat detection accuracy, fewer false positives, and a more intuitive design.

View comparison

Related categories

Vulnerability Management
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)