Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs Rapid7 Metasploit comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.6
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management's support team is helpful but faces communication challenges and delays, needing improved response times.
Sentiment score
7.8
Rapid7 Metasploit's customer service is inconsistent, with varied support across versions, sometimes slow but generally active in development.
My team raised multiple support tickets for the product, and we were able to get responses from Microsoft support team.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is highly rated for scalability, seamless cloud integration, and efficient vulnerability handling across industries.
Sentiment score
7.3
Users find Rapid7 Metasploit adequate for small teams but suggest improvements for better automation and larger operations.
Metasploit can handle big projects and is already prepared for them.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Users commend Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management's stable, reliable performance, with satisfaction ratings from eight to ten over the years.
Sentiment score
9.3
Rapid7 Metasploit is stable and robust, with improved updates, earning user ratings of seven to nine out of ten.
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Defender needs enhanced integration, simplified reporting, improved remediation, and better support for small to medium-sized businesses.
Rapid7 Metasploit faces slow updates, high resource use, needs better integration, broader coverage, user-friendliness, and improved support.
The automated remediations can be more specific.
The database is not always updated with the latest vulnerabilities or zero-day exploits.
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Defender's complex licensing and per-user cost is offset by its competitive pricing and valuable security benefits.
Buyers have mixed views on Rapid7 Metasploit pricing; some find it affordable, others choose open-source due to cost.
Overall, every organization wishes for cheaper options, but we look at the security side as well, so we are good for now.
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management integrates compliance tools and insights, aiding in threat prioritization and offering a valuable security scorecard.
Rapid7 Metasploit offers extensive modules and automation, enhancing penetration testing with graphical interfaces, PostgreSQL integration, and network scanning.
The most valuable aspect is the kind of assessment results I get, and the recommendations provided in Microsoft products really help in taking care of the resources.
The most valuable features of Metasploit include its powerful capabilities for exploitation and scanning.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Defender Vulnerab...
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
18th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (22nd), Microsoft Security Suite (24th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (7th)
Rapid7 Metasploit
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
21st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is 3.4%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 Metasploit is 1.9%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

René-SylvainBédard - PeerSpot reviewer
The vulnerability assessment is very accurate because it runs directly into the vulnerability database
I have three years of experience with Microsoft Defender and Office 365 for eleven years. My company operates as a shop for Microsoft products, and we have always stayed with Microsoft. We intend to displace the competition when my company enters a new client environment. I have dealt with customers who were using Carbon Black and SentinelOne. My company's customers switched work from their previous products to Microsoft because the tools they were using were power-hungry solutions, which had an impact on production. Microsoft Office 365's premium licenses have many built-in services, which our customers used to use from some other products. With Microsoft products, there is no need for our company's customers to pay extra for licensing charges. The major difference between Carbon Black and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management revolves around areas like stability and integration capabilities within the operating systems, which are strong in Microsoft, especially compared to any of its competitors. The actual depth of knowledge that the platform offers is good because Microsoft has been very rigorous in documenting every single vulnerability that exists for its platform. Microsoft has the most complete list of vulnerabilities for its platform.
Aqeel Junaid - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps find vulnerabilities in a system to determine whether the system needs to be upgraded
The solution's exploit development functionality was easy to use and had all the scenarios I could use to run my security assessment. Since the solution has been updated regarding new malware, it gives data protection for security professionals. Rapid7 Metasploit is a good exploit tool, and users need to know what they're doing while using the solution. The solution provides perfect effectiveness in simulating real-world attacks for training purposes. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management?
The licensing costs are reasonable. While the solution is not the cheapest, it is competitively priced and aligns with the industry average. There are no significant additional costs beyond the sta...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management?
The constant changes in the product configuration or the console setup can sometimes be challenging. They can be disruptive because we need to adjust to these changes, which can interfere with ongo...
What do you like most about Rapid7 Metasploit?
I use Rapid7 Metasploit for payload generation and Post-Exploitation.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 Metasploit?
I am not very sure about the pricing. It falls into an intermediate range. However, I am not involved with the partition part.
What needs improvement with Rapid7 Metasploit?
The database is not always updated with the latest vulnerabilities or zero-day exploits. If a vulnerability arises a month or two ago, it might not be included in the database, which is something I...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Metasploit
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
City of Corpus Christi, Diebold, Lumenate, Nebraska Public Power District, Prairie North Regional Health, Apptio, Automation Direct, Bob's Stores, Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions, Carnegie Mellon University
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Rapid7 Metasploit and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.