Amazon Inspector vs Rapid7 Metasploit comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.0, while Rapid7 is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.8% mindshare in VM, compared to Rapid7’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Amazon Inspector

Read 5 Amazon Inspector reviews

1,623 Views
1,408 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Rapid7 Metasploit

Read 19 Rapid7 Metasploit reviews

2,776 Views
1,571 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Amazon Inspector

Rapid7 Metasploit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Rapid7 Metasploit and Amazon Inspector are competitive products in security testing and vulnerability management. Rapid7 Metasploit often leads in user satisfaction due to favorable pricing and support, while Amazon Inspector's comprehensive features make it the preferred choice for enterprises seeking robust functionality.

Features: Rapid7 Metasploit offers an extensive exploit library, excellent penetration testing capabilities, and adaptability for customizable tasks. Amazon Inspector provides automated vulnerability assessments, seamless integration with AWS, and continuous monitoring, making it suitable for cloud-based environments.

Room for Improvement: Rapid7 Metasploit could enhance its automation capabilities, expand native cloud integrations, and improve scalability for large environments. Amazon Inspector would benefit from a more extensive exploit library, detailed reporting features, and improved functionality outside AWS-specific environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rapid7 Metasploit allows flexible on-premises deployment, supporting tailored penetration tasks with noted responsive customer service. Amazon Inspector integrates directly with AWS services, offering streamlined automated deployment and efficient customer service through AWS support channels, simplifying operations for cloud-centric businesses.

Pricing and ROI: Rapid7 Metasploit may have higher upfront licensing costs but delivers strong ROI through advanced testing capabilities. Amazon Inspector offers cost-effective, consumption-based pricing, appealing to cloud-focused users by providing excellent ROI through its automated, cloud-native functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Inspector vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Inspector vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Inspector

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Vendor Risk Management (7th)

Rapid7 Metasploit

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

21st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Amazon Inspector is 2.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 Metasploit is 1.9%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Nikhil Sehgal

Lead Solution Advisor (Cyber Security) at Deloitte

Primarily focuses on security of EC2 instances, provides point-in-time assessments rather than real time protection but provides automated vulnerability detection

It has a limited scope. So, AWS Inspector primarily focuses on the security of the EC2 instance. So, if your architecture includes other AWS services, then you may need to use additional tools for your comprehensive security assessment. So that is one con. Another is, like, we have a dependency on agents. So other is dependency on agents, like, Inspector relies on agents installed on instances for deeper assessment. So managing these agents can be additional overhead. So these kinds of things. It does not even provide real-time protection. So, Inspector provides point-in-time assessment rather than continuous monitoring. So these are all cons. When it comes to false positives, it is there for most security tools as of now. I would not consider false positives a major concern. So, these are the major concerns that I found: dependency on agents, limited scope, and no real-time protection.

Read full review

Aqeel Junaid

Junior Executive - Information Security at sunshine holdings

Helps find vulnerabilities in a system to determine whether the system needs to be upgraded

The solution's exploit development functionality was easy to use and had all the scenarios I could use to run my security assessment. Since the solution has been updated regarding new malware, it gives data protection for security professionals. Rapid7 Metasploit is a good exploit tool, and users need to know what they're doing while using the solution. The solution provides perfect effectiveness in simulating real-world attacks for training purposes. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The findings dashboards are neat and easy to understand, offering clear demarcations for different types of findings and detailed insights into specific vulnerabilities and their associated instances. It is not a place where everything is dumped together. It offers an easy-to-understand layout."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon Inspector is the categorization of findings, which filters vulnerabilities by instance, container image, container repository, and Lambda function."

"The automated vulnerability detection aspect is most valuable."

"The integration of Amazon Inspector with other AWS services has enhanced our security. Security Hub is a major asset because it allows us to centralize data from various AWS services. We can integrate third-party tools as well. It is just a single-click option."

"The vulnerability discovery is valuable, and they also rank those vulnerabilities for you. So, you could rapidly attack some of the higher, severe vulnerabilities as they pop up, if they do pop up."

"Amazon Inspector is highly stable, rated ten out of ten, and this stability impacts business security and administration positively."

"I use Rapid7 Metasploit for payload generation and Post-Exploitation."

"All of the features are great."

"The reporting on the solution is good."

"Rapid7 Metasploit is a useful product."

"It's not possible to do penetration testing without being very proficient in Metasploit."

"It is scalable. It's in line with our needs."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

"The most valuable feature for us is the support for testing Linux-based web server components."

More Rapid7 Metasploit pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the scanning capabilities. I'd like to see broader coverage in terms of the vulnerabilities detected."

"One area for improvement in Amazon Inspector is the automation aspect."

"It has a limited scope. So, AWS Inspector primarily focuses on the security of the EC2 instance. So, if your architecture includes other AWS services, then you may need to use additional tools for your comprehensive security assessment. So that is one con. Another is, like, we have a dependency on agents."

"One major area for improvement is remediation. My team works on remediating findings over time, likely using available patches. However, easier integration with Amazon's patching services would be very helpful."

"There isn't too much to improve right now. Scanning on demand or as a part of the pipeline versus a post pipeline solution would be good, but it is not a deal breaker by any means."

"There are numerous outdated exploits in their database that should be updated."

"The solution is not user-friendly and has room for improvement."

"Better automation capabilities would be an improvement."

"The open-source version has reporting limitations. You need to develop these capabilities yourself. Built-in reporting is an excellent feature for penetration testing, but it isn't a must-have. The solution could also cover more vulnerabilities. Metasploit has around 10,000 exploits in its library, but more is always better."

"Metasploit cannot be installed on a machine with an antivirus."

"The database is not always updated with the latest vulnerabilities or zero-day exploits."

"The database is not always updated with the latest vulnerabilities or zero-day exploits. If a vulnerability arises a month or two ago, it might not be included in the database, which is something I would like to see improved."

"Rapid7 Metasploit could be made easier for new users to learn."

More Rapid7 Metasploit cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is scaled as you go. There are probably a certain number of scans per month, and there are tiers. If you're under a certain tier, it is free. The second level is pennies, and then all the way up to like a million. So, it has a tiered pricing program. They're pretty good with your initial scanning, and there is room to scale based on being affordable, but it is fairly cheap. There are no additional costs. They pretty much think about it as a pay-per-scan type model."

"The pricing is very transparent and clear."

"It's priced according to market standards for its services."

"We pay monthly. The pricing is reasonable."

"It is a reasonably priced solution. I would rate it from five out of ten."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product's pricing a six. So it's fairly priced."

"I have used the free version of Rapid7 Metasploit."

"The pricing structure involves a one-time purchase cost of approximately twenty thousand dollars or euros for all customers."

"I use the open-source version of this product. Pricing is not relevant."

"It is expensive. Our license expired, and our company is not thinking to renew because of our budget."

"The great advantage with Rapid7 Metasploit, of course, is that it's free."

More Rapid7 Metasploit pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Inspector?

The integration of Amazon Inspector with other AWS services has enhanced our security. Security Hub is a major asset because it allows us to centralize data from various AWS services. We can integ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Inspector?

The pricing for Amazon Inspector is very fair, and I would rate it as two out of ten, with ten being the most expensive. It's on the cheaper side.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Inspector?

One area for improvement in Amazon Inspector is the automation aspect. Automation for scheduling 'turn on' and 'turn off' operations and better integration with CloudWatch for alarms could enhance ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Rapid7 Metasploit?

I use Rapid7 Metasploit for payload generation and Post-Exploitation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 Metasploit?

I am not very sure about the pricing. It falls into an intermediate range. However, I am not involved with the partition part.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 Metasploit?

The database is not always updated with the latest vulnerabilities or zero-day exploits. If a vulnerability arises a month or two ago, it might not be included in the database, which is something I...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 27% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 12% of the time

Wiz vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 7% of the time

Qualys TotalCloud vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 3% of the time

More Amazon Inspector Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 28% of the time

Acunetix vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 13% of the time

Pentera vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 11% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 6% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 5% of the time

More Rapid7 Metasploit Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Inspector

December 2024

Download Amazon Inspector product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 Metasploit

December 2024

Download Rapid7 Metasploit product report

Also Known As

No data available

Metasploit

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Rapid7

Overview

Amazon Inspector is an automated security assessment service that helps improve the security and compliance of applications deployed on AWS. Amazon Inspector automatically assesses applications for exposure, vulnerabilities, and deviations from best practices. After performing an assessment, Amazon Inspector produces a detailed list of security findings prioritized by level of severity. These findings can be reviewed directly or as part of detailed assessment reports which are available via the Amazon Inspector console or API.

Amazon Inspector security assessments help you check for unintended network accessibility of your Amazon EC2 instances and for vulnerabilities on those EC2 instances. Amazon Inspector assessments are offered to you as pre-defined rules packages mapped to common security best practices and vulnerability definitions. Examples of built-in rules include checking for access to your EC2 instances from the internet, remote root login being enabled, or vulnerable software versions installed. These rules are regularly updated by AWS security researchers.

Attackers are always developing new exploits and attack methods—Metasploit penetration testing software helps you use their own weapons against them. Utilizing an ever-growing database of exploits, you can safely simulate real-world attacks on your network to train your security team to spot and stop the real thing.

Sample Customers

betterment, caplinked, flatiron, university of nutri dame

City of Corpus Christi, Diebold, Lumenate, Nebraska Public Power District, Prairie North Regional Health, Apptio, Automation Direct, Bob's Stores, Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions, Carnegie Mellon University

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Inspector vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

December 2024

Free Report: Amazon Inspector vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Inspector vs. Rapid7 Metasploit and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Inspector vs. Rapid7 Metasploit report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.