Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pentera vs Rapid7 Metasploit comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
Pentera's customer service is responsive and helpful, though expertise varies; technical support is highly rated despite some delays.
No sentiment score available
Rapid7 Metasploit's support is inconsistent, with mixed reviews on effectiveness and lacking official support for the community edition.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
3.9
Pentera needs improvements in graphic card support, dashboard specificity, licensing options, flexibility, and scalability for enhanced testing and monitoring.
No sentiment score available
Enhance Rapid7 Metasploit by updating exploits, reducing resource usage, improving GUI, and adding user-friendly features and training.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Pentera is scalable, adaptable, and well-rated, efficiently supporting diverse user numbers and operations with minimal team maintenance.
No sentiment score available
Rapid7 Metasploit's scalability receives mixed feedback, with concerns about automation and scalability, though some find it sufficient.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Pentera users view licensing costs variably, yet agree on its effectiveness and value in enhancing cybersecurity and ransomware protection.
No sentiment score available
Enterprise users have mixed views on Rapid7 Metasploit pricing, with concerns over affordability versus value in licensing costs.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Pentera is highly praised for its stability, quickly resolving early bugs, making it a reliable network tool choice.
No sentiment score available
Rapid7 Metasploit's stability is improved, rated highly by users, but some report varying experiences with recent updates.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.5
Pentera excels in vulnerability assessment and protection, offering automated solutions for on-prem and cloud infrastructure with ease of use.
Sentiment score
7.6
Rapid7 Metasploit provides extensive penetration testing tools, automation, and scalability with unique direct exploitation across multiple operating systems.
 

Categories and Ranking

Pentera
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Penetration Testing Services (1st), Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) (1st)
Rapid7 Metasploit
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
19th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Pentera is 4.2%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 Metasploit is 1.9%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

Richard Marlow - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides good features and helps monitor the status of ransomware protection in an organization
The tool is quite scalable. There's a one-to-one relationship between the engine and how many scans we can do. We can only do one scan with one engine. We had some issues around the password assessments because we added a lot of users. It took a long time. I rate the scalability a seven out of ten. We have three users in our organization.
Aqeel Junaid - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps find vulnerabilities in a system to determine whether the system needs to be upgraded
The solution's exploit development functionality was easy to use and had all the scenarios I could use to run my security assessment. Since the solution has been updated regarding new malware, it gives data protection for security professionals. Rapid7 Metasploit is a good exploit tool, and users need to know what they're doing while using the solution. The solution provides perfect effectiveness in simulating real-world attacks for training purposes. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Educational Organization
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pentera?
What I like the most about Pentera is its solution-oriented approach.
What needs improvement with Pentera?
One area for product improvement could be the inclusion of a dashboard to cover multiple branches and subsidiaries, allowing for centralized monitoring.
What is your primary use case for Pentera?
Our customers use the product to validate their security environment, ensuring that vulnerabilities within the network are identified and addressed.
What do you like most about Rapid7 Metasploit?
I use Rapid7 Metasploit for payload generation and Post-Exploitation.
What needs improvement with Rapid7 Metasploit?
Rapid7 Metasploit could be made easier for new users to learn.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Metasploit
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Blackstone Group Caterpillar Apria Healthcare Taylor Vinters Sandler Capital Management Drawbridge BNP Paribas British Red Cross
City of Corpus Christi, Diebold, Lumenate, Nebraska Public Power District, Prairie North Regional Health, Apptio, Automation Direct, Bob's Stores, Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions, Carnegie Mellon University
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera vs. Rapid7 Metasploit and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.