Rapid7 Metasploit and Pentera are penetration testing solutions in the cybersecurity domain. Rapid7 Metasploit seems to have an edge in pricing and support, whereas Pentera is stronger in feature offerings.
Features: Rapid7 Metasploit provides a vast database of exploits, seamless integration with various security tools, and a robust penetration testing framework. Pentera offers automated security validation, continuous testing, and remediation capabilities that enhance its feature set.
Room for Improvement: Rapid7 Metasploit could enhance its automation capabilities, update its exploit database more frequently, and improve the user interface for better usability. Pentera might focus on reducing initial costs, expanding its integration options with third-party tools, and offering more flexible licensing terms.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rapid7 Metasploit's deployment is straightforward with comprehensive support that aids setup and maintenance. Pentera's deployment focuses on automation, integrating smoothly into existing workflows, with responsive customer service ensuring quick implementation.
Pricing and ROI: Rapid7 Metasploit offers competitive pricing with a flexible licensing model, potentially leading to a high ROI if used effectively. Pentera's higher initial costs are balanced by its advanced features, providing long-term savings and efficiency that may result in a greater ROI for those emphasizing robust capabilities.
Some customers consider the ROI favorable, but facing difficulties now due to changes in the licensing model, which has made it more expensive compared to last year.
The ROI can be very rapid for organizations using vulnerability assessment for the first time.
Metasploit has helped save time, especially with testing websites or VIPD projects.
Rapid7 sometimes struggles with queries from non-security people, whereas Tenable is more patient.
The customer support is excellent
Metasploit can handle big projects and is already prepared for them.
Rapid7 Metasploit is highly scalable.
I would rate the scalability of Metasploit as an eight out of ten.
I have never faced any technical issues or downtimes.
I find Metasploit to be very stable, and I would rate its stability as a nine out of ten.
When the IP is imported into a system, we cannot withdraw or revoke the license.
Metasploit excels in vulnerability assessment, it could improve in vulnerability management.
The database is not always updated with the latest vulnerabilities or zero-day exploits.
The time taken to fetch reports based on the number of events can be extensive.
Metasploit is cheaper than Nessus and offers a more robust community edition that provides a good experience for studying Metasploit.
The cost is approximately $15 per device.
We can automate the Pentera processes by automatically creating scenarios to validate the system.
Rapid7 offers comprehensive features within one platform, eliminating the need to integrate multiple tools to see all alerts in one place.
The ability to automate website testing and integrate it into my script makes it even more efficient.
When I compare Metasploit with Nessus, I find that Metasploit is faster and it does not burden the system as much.
Pentera is the category leader for Automated Security Validation, allowing every organization to evaluate its security readiness, to know its real security risk at any given moment. Test all cybersecurity layers across the attack surface – inside and out – by safely emulating attacks & prioritize patching with a risk-based remediation roadmap.
Thousands of security professionals and service providers around the world use Pentera to guide remediation and close security gaps before they are exploited. For more info visit: pentera.io
Attackers are always developing new exploits and attack methods—Metasploit penetration testing software helps you use their own weapons against them. Utilizing an ever-growing database of exploits, you can safely simulate real-world attacks on your network to train your security team to spot and stop the real thing.
We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.