Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs Microsoft Sentinel comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.2
Microsoft Defender's customer service is criticized for slow responses, but its technical support is praised for reliability and expertise.
Sentiment score
7.3
Microsoft Sentinel support is generally positive, with mixed reviews on responsiveness and the necessity for premium support tiers.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.5
Customers seek reduced false positives, better report customization, and improved support for enhanced vulnerability identification on Windows 11.
Sentiment score
5.0
Microsoft Sentinel users want better integration, more tools, improved UI, clearer documentation, reduced costs, and enhanced alert system.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
9.3
Microsoft Defender is praised for its scalability, efficiently managing vulnerabilities and supporting growth across diverse industries.
Sentiment score
8.1
Microsoft Sentinel offers scalable, automatic resource adjustments, multi-region support, and extensive data integration, adapting to diverse organizational needs.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
5.3
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is competitively priced, offering valuable features with P1 and P2 licenses, despite complex licensing.
Sentiment score
5.2
Microsoft Sentinel offers value through integration but requires careful cost management due to its complex, consumption-based pricing model.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.7
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is highly stable, reliable, and almost perfectly available, often rated between eight and ten by users.
Sentiment score
8.4
Microsoft Sentinel is highly stable and reliable, with 99.9% availability, despite some integration and log ingestion issues.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management provides comprehensive security features, assessments, and integrations to effectively identify and prioritize vulnerabilities.
Sentiment score
8.5
Microsoft Sentinel offers seamless integration, automation, AI capabilities, and scalable threat detection, enhancing security with cost-effectiveness and efficient monitoring.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Defender Vulnerab...
Ranking in Microsoft Security Suite
23rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (17th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (23rd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (6th)
Microsoft Sentinel
Ranking in Microsoft Security Suite
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
89
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (2nd), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Microsoft Security Suite category, the mindshare of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Sentinel is 5.6%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Microsoft Security Suite
 

Featured Reviews

René-SylvainBédard - PeerSpot reviewer
The vulnerability assessment is very accurate because it runs directly into the vulnerability database
I have three years of experience with Microsoft Defender and Office 365 for eleven years. My company operates as a shop for Microsoft products, and we have always stayed with Microsoft. We intend to displace the competition when my company enters a new client environment. I have dealt with customers who were using Carbon Black and SentinelOne. My company's customers switched work from their previous products to Microsoft because the tools they were using were power-hungry solutions, which had an impact on production. Microsoft Office 365's premium licenses have many built-in services, which our customers used to use from some other products. With Microsoft products, there is no need for our company's customers to pay extra for licensing charges. The major difference between Carbon Black and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management revolves around areas like stability and integration capabilities within the operating systems, which are strong in Microsoft, especially compared to any of its competitors. The actual depth of knowledge that the platform offers is good because Microsoft has been very rigorous in documenting every single vulnerability that exists for its platform. Microsoft has the most complete list of vulnerabilities for its platform.
Nitin Arora - PeerSpot reviewer
Gives us one place to investigate and respond to threats, and automation eliminates manual work
They can work on the EDR side of things. It is already really superb, because of the kinds of features we get with the EDR solution. It's not a standard EDR and they have recently enhanced things. But the problem is with onboarding devices. I have different OS flavors, including a large number of Linux, Windows, macOS, and some on-prem machines as well. Every time we need to onboard these kinds of machines into the EDR, we need to do it with the help of Intune, to sync up the devices, and do the configuration. I'm looking for something on the EDR side that will reduce this kind of work. They can eliminate having to do manual configuration for the machines, and check the different types of configurations for each OS. In some cases, it does not support some OSs. If they could reduce this type of work, that would be really amazing.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Microsoft Security Suite solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management?
The licensing costs are reasonable. While the solution is not the cheapest, it is competitively priced and aligns with the industry average. There are no significant additional costs beyond the sta...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management?
The constant changes in the product configuration or the console setup can sometimes be challenging. They can be disruptive because we need to adjust to these changes, which can interfere with ongo...
Is there a common threat intelligence tool that aggregates multiple threat intelligence sources?
Yes, Azure Sentinel is a SIEM on the Cloud. Multiple data sources can be uploaded and analyzed with Azure Sentinel and its Threat Hunting functionality with AI available as templates or customized ...
What is a better choice, Splunk or Azure Sentinel?
It would really depend on (1) which logs you need to ingest and (2) what are your use cases Splunk is easy for ingestion of anything, but the charge per GB/Day Indexed and it gets expensive as log ...
Which is better - Azure Sentinel or AWS Security Hub?
We like that Azure Sentinel does not require as much maintenance as legacy SIEMs that are on-premises. Azure Sentinel is auto-scaling - you will not have to worry about performance impact, you will...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Azure Sentinel
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Microsoft Sentinel is trusted by companies of all sizes including ABM, ASOS, Uniper, First West Credit Union, Avanade, and more.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Microsoft Sentinel and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.