Red Hat AMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

Red Hat and VMware are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Red Hat is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4, while VMware is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1. Additionally, 90% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of VMware users who would recommend it.

Red Hat AMQ

Read 9 Red Hat AMQ reviews

2,748 Views
1,882 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Read 82 VMware Tanzu Data Solutions reviews

4,185 Views
3,474 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Red Hat AMQ

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Red Hat AMQ and VMware Tanzu Data Solutions based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Red Hat AMQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Report (Updated: September 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat AMQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

September 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 800,688 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Red Hat AMQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (7th), Relational Databases Tools (9th), Data Warehouse (7th)

Featured Reviews

Bhushan Patil

Director at ABSYS Consultancy Services

May 24, 2024

Reliable, offers good scalability but has multiple components like several queue managers

We just started working with Red Hat AMQ. We selected it as the ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) platform for a new airport project. I manage the entire Master System Integration (MSI) project for one of the new airports. I like its flexibility, scalability, and the number of protocols it supports.…

Read full review

Erick Karanja

Technical Lead at Cellulant Kenya

Apr 11, 2024

Management interface is cool and offers good features like dead-lettering (DLXs) and more

I like many features in RabbitMQ. Number one, reliability for the messages is key. RabbitMQ ensures your messages are safe. They are not deleted and stuff. Number two, they have a very good feature called Retrying messages – it's all about retries. You can easily retry a message through RabbitMQ. So, if processing fails, you can push the message back into RabbitMQ. Maybe you can re-consume it and so on. They also have features like tags, which we call "dead-lettering (DLXs)." If it's approved, it means the messages have been delivered. If it's false or missing the first time you get it, you can make decisions based on that. The feature assigned to code for it is called the dead-letter queue. Moreover, the management interface is so cool. It's simple. It's able to give us an overview of the messages that have been consumed, pending messages, messages that have been delivered, messages that have been acknowledged, and so on. We can also extend that management to tools like... we can extend the management through, like, Kibana or Grafana

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination."

"This product is well adopted on the OpenShift platform. For organizations like ours that use OpenShift for many of our products, this is a good feature."

"The most valuable feature for us is the operator-based automation that is provided by Streams for infrastructure as well as user and topic management. This saves a lot of time and effort on our part to provide infrastructure. For example, the deployment of infrastructure is reduced from approximately a week to a day."

"The solution is very lightweight, easy to configure, simple to manage, and robust since it launched."

"The most valuable feature is stability."

"My impression is that it is average in terms of scalability."

"Reliability is the main criterion for selecting this tool for one of the busiest airports in Mumbai."

"I can organize the tool with microservices, which allows me to use it across different services. It is easy to learn."

More Red Hat AMQ pros

"The security is great."

"After creating a RabbitMQ service, they provide you with a sort of web management dashboard."

"The stability of this solution was very good."

"The solution's technical support is good."

"A very good, open-source platform."

"Very fast for query processing."

"The solution has really cool features to use. Its management console is excellent. You can utilize plugins to view the performance of the whole service on one network."

"Tanzu Greenplum's most valuable features include the integration of modern data science approaches across an MPP platform."

Cons

"There is improvement needed to keep the support libraries updated."

"The product needs to improve its documentation and training."

"There are some aspects of the monitoring that could be improved on. There is a tool that is somewhat connected to Kafka called Service Registry. This is a product by Red Hat that I would like to see integrated more tightly."

"The turnaround of adopting new versions of underlying technologies sometimes is too slow."

"AMQ could be better integrated with Jira and patch management tools."

"There are several areas in this solution that need improvement, including clustering multi-nodes and message ordering."

"This product needs better visualization capabilities in general."

"Red Hat AMQ's cost could be improved, and it could have better integration."

More Red Hat AMQ cons

"It doesn't have any GUI-based monitoring tools."

"Initial setup is a little complex. It took around two weeks to deploy."

"There are some security concerns that have been raised with this product."

"If you have a user consuming a huge load of resources, it takes down the entire system."

"The fact that a single queue can't be distributed across multiple instances/nodes is a major disadvantage."

"The solution needs improvement on performance."

"Implementing a circuit breaker scenario using RabbitMQ is complicated. This complexity arises because manual intervention is required to manage worker details and handle operations based on worker IP addresses."

"RabbitMQ is clearly better supported on Linux than it is on Windows. There are idiosyncrasies in the Windows version that are not there on Linux."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is open-source."

"This is a very cost-effective solution and the pricing is much better than competitors."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"There is a subscription needed for this solution and there are support plans available."

"Red Hat AMQ's pricing could be improved."

"The price is pretty good."

"It is an open-source platform. Although, we have to pay for additional features."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"It is the best product with best fit for price/performance customer objectives."

"This is an open source solution."

"Pricing is good compared to other products. It's fine."

"The solution's pricing is cost-effective as it does not involve significant expenses. Licensing is required only for the server, while clients do not need any licensing. Therefore, it proves to be a cost-efficient option."

"Tanzu Greenplum's pricing is really competitive and gives excellent value for money."

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Red Hat AMQ?

AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat AMQ?

The product needs to improve its documentation and training.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat AMQ?

See all answers

How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?

IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware Tanzu Greenplum?

The loading speed is very good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu Greenplum?

It’s an open-source solution. There are no expenses for using it.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache Kafka vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 29% of the time

ActiveMQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 28% of the time

IBM MQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 19% of the time

IBM Event Streams vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon MQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 4% of the time

More Red Hat AMQ Competitors

IBM MQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 14% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 10% of the time

Apache Kafka vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Exadata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 8% of the time

ActiveMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 7% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat AMQ

August 2024

Download Red Hat AMQ product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

August 2024

Download VMware Tanzu Data Solutions product report

Also Known As

Red Hat JBoss A-MQ, Red Hat JBoss AMQ

Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres

Learn More

Red Hat

VMware

Overview

To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

VMware Tanzu is a robust platform tailored for data warehousing, complex analytics, BI applications, and predictive analytics. It excels in scalability, performance, and parallel processing, enhancing data handling efficiency. Users report significant productivity improvements and streamlined operations, making it ideal for comprehensive data solutions.

Sample Customers

E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings

General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat AMQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

September 2024

Free Report: Red Hat AMQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat AMQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Red Hat AMQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.