ReversingLabs vs Veracode comparison

ReversingLabs and Veracode are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. ReversingLabs is ranked #44, while Veracode is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. ReversingLabs holds a 0.6% mindshare in AS, compared to Veracode’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ReversingLabs users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Veracode users who would recommend it.

ReversingLabs

Read 4 ReversingLabs reviews

2,428 Views
558 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Veracode

Read 208 Veracode reviews

19,227 Views
11,536 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

ReversingLabs

Veracode

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Veracode and ReversingLabs are both prominent in the software security space. Users report better feature satisfaction with Veracode, while ReversingLabs excels in pricing and ease of deployment.

Features: Users appreciate the comprehensive scanning capabilities and integrations of Veracode. ReversingLabs is noted for its advanced threat intelligence and file analysis. Despite this, Veracode's extensive coverage and better integration give it a slight edge in features.

Room for Improvement: Users of Veracode suggest improving scan speed and enhancing detailed reporting. ReversingLabs users point out the need for better documentation and enhanced customer support. Veracode's users focus more on performance, while ReversingLabs' users focus on support infrastructure.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veracode is praised for its seamless cloud integration and effective customer service. ReversingLabs offers a straightforward deployment but falls short in customer service responsiveness. Although both are easy to deploy, Veracode's superior customer service makes it more favorable.

Pricing and ROI: Veracode is viewed as more costly upfront but provides a stronger ROI due to its extensive capabilities. ReversingLabs is more affordable but offers a slower return on investment. Users find Veracode worth the higher price, while ReversingLabs appeals to those seeking budget-friendly options.

To learn more, read our detailed ReversingLabs vs. Veracode Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ReversingLabs vs. Veracode

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,076 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ReversingLabs

Ranking in Application Security Tools

44th

Ranking in Container Security

48th

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

26th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anti-Malware Tools (44th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (30th), Software Supply Chain Security (19th)

Veracode

Ranking in Application Security Tools

3rd

Ranking in Container Security

8th

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Static Code Analysis (1st), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (1st), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of ReversingLabs is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veracode is 4.6%, down from 10.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Veracode	4.6%
ReversingLabs	0.6%
Other	94.8%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Tim Craig

Forensic Lead, Global Security Fusion Center at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Very good malware and goodware repository and enables us to look more deeply at indicators of compromise

The automated static analysis of malware is the most valuable feature. Its detection abilities are very good. It hits all of the different platforms out there, platforms that see the items in the wild. Also, the solution’s object and file analysis provide us with actionable insights. Its malware and goodware repository is very good. It's very robust. It gets all of the different repositories that are out there that do analysis and brings them under one roof where we can statically analyze for those indicators of compromise and look at them more deeply. If we need to go deeper into things, we can do that.

Read full review

reviewer2703864

Head of Security Architecture at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Onboarding developers successfully while improving code security through IDE integration

Regarding room for improvement, we have some problems when onboarding new projects because the build process has to be done in a certain way, as Veracode analyzes the binaries and not the code by itself alone. If the process is not configured correctly, it doesn't work. That's one of the things that we are discussing with Veracode. Something positive that we've been able to do is submit formal feature requests to them, and they are working on them; they've already solved some of them. This encourages us to propose new ideas and improvements. Another improvement that we asked for this use case is to be able to configure how Veracode Fix proposes and fixes because sometimes it makes proposals using libraries that go against our architecture design made by the enterprise architecture team. For example, we want them to propose using another library, and that's something we already asked Veracode, and they are working on it. We want to specify when you see this kind of vulnerability, you can only propose these two options.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ReversingLabs has a large sample size."

"As far as the malware repository is concerned, it's extensive. It's a good source for finding samples, where we are unable to find them on other channels or by leveraging other sources."

"The automated static analysis of malware is the most valuable feature. Its detection abilities are very good. It hits all of the different platforms out there, platforms that see the items in the wild."

"It offers reports on a great many more file types than the other analysis solutions we have. It can give us a more in-depth analysis and better reporting on a larger number of file types. It also gives us a more comprehensive score on a number of things as well, and that's why we're using it as a front-end filter. It gives us more information... It's valuable because of its depth of information, as well as the breadth it gives us. There aren't a lot of tools that cover all of the different file types."

"As far as static analysis information is concerned, we use most of the information that is available in order to determine whether or not we might be dealing with a malware variant. This includes information that is related to Java rules. This is also related to malware families indicated or specific malicious software variants that are labeled by name."

"The installation was straightforward."

"I appreciate Veracode's SAST and SCA features, which help to find open-source vulnerabilities. I'd estimate it's about 98% accurate, though some false positives occasionally exist. Our team has been using it for a long time."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its extensive reporting capabilities and user-friendly interface."

"It does software composition analysis, discovering open source software weaknesses."

"Informs me of code security vulnerabilities. Bamboo build automation with Veracode API calls are used."

"The time savings has been tremendous. We saw ROI in the first six months."

"Using an automated tool brings cost reduction and more security."

"The integrated IDE tool enables users to get instant feedback in real-time on the code itself, rather than waiting for it to go through the CI/CD pipeline and get the result."

More Veracode pros

Cons

"While the company is very helpful, it would be very much appreciated to have extensive proof of concept scripts for the different APIs available, though not for all the APIs that we have purchased. Respective scripts are available, but those scripts which are available are typically not of very high quality."

"We would really like further integration with our threat intelligence platform, which is called ThreatConnect. We would also really like further integrations with an endpoint protection product we use called Tanium. The reason I mentioned both of these is that ReversingLabs claims to have extensive integrations with both of them, but they did not work for us."

"The product support could be better at times. Sometimes, the resources that they provide could be of higher quality."

"I would like to see if we could do a little bit more of bulk uploading of hash sets. Right now, I can only do them individually."

"The solution needs to improve integrations."

"I would like to see improvement on the analytics side, and in integrations with different tools. Also, the dynamic scanning takes time."

"An area for improvement in Veracode is the time that it takes to scan large projects, as that makes it difficult to fit into our CI/CD pipelines."

"On-premise implementation is not available."

"When Veracode updates the pool of tests and security checks, it could be a little more transparent about what it is releasing. It's not clear what it's adding. They do thousands of checks, and when they add more, there aren't many details about what the new tests are doing."

"The results of agent-based software composition analysis are not connected to policy scanning. So, for me, the only thing that Veracode can improve in Software Composition Analysis is to connect it with the policy scan because, at present, it is a bit inconvenient for those in our organization who use agent-based Software Composition Analysis. In the end, they need to make a static scan with all those libraries in order to receive that report. If Veracode implemented a connection between agent-based static scan and static scanning itself, it would be great because it would lead to fewer operations in order to prepare release documentation and release reporting from Veracode. We recently had a conversation with Veracode about it."

"The solution does not support Dynamic Application Security Testing."

"I've seen slightly better static analysis tools from other companies when it comes to speed and ease of use."

"It can take time to find options if you don’t use the interface a lot. At some point, a bit of interface restyling may help."

More Veracode cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Currently, the license number of lookups that we purchased has not been reached yet, because the integration has only recently been completed. However, our usage is expected and planned to increase over the next couple of months."

"We have a yearly contract based on the number of queries and malicious programs which can be processed."

"Its pricing is fair."

"As compared to others, it is a costly solution. It is overpriced, and many organizations with a limited budget cannot afford it. That is why they are going for other tools, but those tools are not that effective. Veracode is better in terms of quality. If you want good service, you have to pay for it."

"Veracode is expensive. Some of its products are expensive. I don't think it's way more expensive than its competitors. The dynamic is definitely worth it, as I think it's cheaper than the competitors. The static scan is a little bit more expensive, around 20 percent more expensive. The manual pen test is more expensive, but it is an expensive service because it's a manual pen test and we also do retests. I don't think it is way more expensive than the competitors, but it's about 15 to 20 percent more expensive."

"For our company, the price is reasonable for the benefits that we get."

"Costs are reasonable. No special infrastructure is required and the license model is good."

"It is very reasonably priced compared to what we were paying our previous vendor. For the same price, we are getting much more value and reducing our AppSec costs from 40 to 50 percent."

"The pricing is reasonable compared to other tools."

"They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works."

More Veracode pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

University

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	69
Midsize Enterprise	45
Large Enterprise	114

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

What do you like most about Veracode Static Analysis?

I like its integration with GitHub. I like using it from GitHub. I can use the GitHub URL and find out the vulnerabilities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veracode Static Analysis?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Veracode is that it is fairly moderate.

See all answers

Comparisons

VirusTotal vs ReversingLabs

Compared 9% of the time

JFrog Xray vs ReversingLabs

Compared 8% of the time

MetaDefender vs ReversingLabs

Compared 8% of the time

OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox vs ReversingLabs

Compared 5% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs ReversingLabs

Compared 5% of the time

More ReversingLabs Competitors

SonarQube vs Veracode

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Veracode

Compared 8% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs Veracode

Compared 4% of the time

Coverity Static vs Veracode

Compared 3% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Veracode

Compared 3% of the time

More Veracode Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ReversingLabs

February 2026

Download ReversingLabs product report

Buyer's Guide

Veracode

February 2026

Download Veracode product report

Also Known As

ReversingLabs Titanium, ReversingLabs secure.software

Crashtest Security , Veracode Detect

Overview

ReversingLabs is the trusted authority in software and file security. We provide the modern cybersecurity platform to verify and deliver safe binaries. Trusted by the Fortune 500 and leading cybersecurity vendors, the ReversingLabs Titanium Platform® powers the software supply chain and file security insights, tracking over 35 billion files daily with the ability to deconstruct full software binaries in seconds to minutes. Only ReversingLabs provides that final exam to determine whether a single file or full software binary presents a risk to your organization and your customers.

RL - Trust Delivered.

https://www.reversinglabs.com

ReversingLabs

Veracode is a leading provider of application security solutions, offering tools to identify, mitigate, and prevent vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle. Its cloud-based platform integrates security into DevOps workflows, helping organizations ensure that their code remains secure and compliant with industry standards.

Veracode supports multiple application security testing types, including static analysis (SAST), dynamic analysis (DAST), software composition analysis (SCA), and manual penetration testing. These tools are designed to help developers detect vulnerabilities early in development while maintaining speed in deployment. Veracode also emphasizes scalability, offering features for enterprises that manage a large number of applications across different teams. Its robust reporting and analytics capabilities allow organizations to continuously monitor their security posture and track progress toward remediation.

What are the key features of Veracode?

Static Analysis (SAST) - Scans source code for vulnerabilities before deployment.
Dynamic Analysis (DAST) - Examines applications in a running state to detect flaws in real-time.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) - Identifies risks in open-source libraries and third-party components.
Manual Penetration Testing - Offers expert analysis for more complex vulnerabilities.
Integrations with DevOps tools - Seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines for automated security checks.

What benefits should users consider in Veracode reviews?

Early detection of vulnerabilities - Helps developers fix security issues early in the development process.
Scalability - Supports organizations with large-scale application portfolios.
Compliance support - Ensures applications meet various security standards and regulations.
Developer training - Provides tools for educating developers on secure coding practices.
Comprehensive reporting - Offers detailed reports that track remediation and risk trends.

Veracode is widely adopted in industries like finance, healthcare, and government, where compliance and security are critical. It helps these organizations maintain strict security standards while enabling rapid development through its integration with Agile and DevOps methodologies.

Veracode helps businesses secure their applications efficiently, ensuring they can deliver safe and compliant software at scale.

Veracode

Sample Customers

Financial services, healthcare, government, manufacturing, oil & gas, telecommunications, information technology

Manhattan Associates, Azalea Health, Sabre, QAD, Floor & Decor, Prophecy International, SchoolCNXT, Keap, Rekner, Cox Automotive, Automation Anywhere, State of Missouri and others.

Buyer's Guide

ReversingLabs vs. Veracode

March 2026

Free Report: ReversingLabs vs. Veracode

Find out what your peers are saying about ReversingLabs vs. Veracode and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ReversingLabs vs. Veracode report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors, best Container Security vendors, and best Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.