Rivery vs SnapLogic comparison

"The solution's most valuable features are that it is quick to connect and simple to use."

"Connects to many APIs in the market and new ones are being added all the time."

"SnapLogice is a low-code development tool."

"I find the reusability and the snaps to be very valuable features."

"The product is easy to use and has many connectivity options."

"It is a stable solution."

"The vendor handles the maintenance of the solution"

"The API architecture makes it easy for orchestration."

"I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL."

"Despite having no prior experience in SnapLogic, we managed to build, test, and prepare it for release in just three hours, handling heavy data efficiently."

"Lineage and an impact analysis or logic dependency are lacking."

"Pricing is a little steep for smaller organizations, I would say. The product's pricing model could be a little bit better."

"Ultra Pipelines provides real-time ingestion but it needs some adjustment."

"SnapLogic doesn't provide any on-premises software, so users have only cloud-based software to use."

"The problem is that SnapLogic doesn't offer a wide variety of connectors. For example, integrating with Salesforce is not that easy."

"I would like to see more performance-related dashboards, ones that display the cost of a pipeline, for instance. Also, it would be helpful to have management dashboards for overseeing pipelines and connections."

"We'd like zero downtime in the future."

"What could be improved in SnapLogic is that it was not capable in terms of processing a large number of datasets, but at that point, SnapLogic was evolving. It didn't give a lot of Snaps. I heard recently there are a lot of Snaps getting added and the solution was being enhanced, particularly to connect different data sources. When I was working with SnapLogic six months to one year back, I faced the issue of it not being capable of handling a huge volume of datasets or didn't have much of Snaps, and that was the drawback. If there is any large number of data sets, that's based on or depends on your configuration. If it is a huge volume of data, other traditional ETL tools such as Informatica and Talend can process millions and billions of records, while in SnapLogic, the Snaplex fails or it returns an error in terms of processing that huge volume of data. Informatica, Talend, or any other ETL tool can run for hours in terms of jobs, while SnapLogic jobs fail when the threshold is reached. SnapLogic isn't able to withstand processing, but I don't know if that's still an issue at present, because the solution is getting enhanced and it's been more than six months to one year since I last worked with SnapLogic. There are now a lot of Snaps getting added to the solution, and if it can overcome the limitations I mentioned, SnapLogic could be the go-to tool because currently, it's not being used as much in organizations. It's being used comparatively less compared to other retail tools."

"The setup cost would be four or five. There would be only one point of improvement if the price could be lower."

"SnapLogic should have some inbuilt protocol mechanism in order to speed up."

"I rate the tool's price as six out of ten if I consider the lowest price to be one and the highest price to be ten."

"The pricing is okay."

"They have pricing/usage tiers that are easy to move up or down."

"By scaling the solution incrementally the cost is controlled and more beneficial to the client."

"I used the free trial."

"When comparing it with solutions like Apigee or MuleSoft, it still offers better value."

"SnapLogic's price is high compared to the other tools available in the market."

"The license model is based on consumption."

"The cost with SnapLogic is an annual license and better than Informatica."