We performed a comparison between Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes and Tektronix Oscilloscopes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Siglent, Tektronix, Keysight Technologies and others in Oscilloscopes."The noise floor for reference clocks is pretty low, so this instrument is able to measure it where others cannot."
"It is a more efficient, easier way to do measurements."
"The instrument has a wide bandwidth. You can sweep across a wide range of frequencies."
"The product is quite reliable and straightforward to use. Typically, there are no households that we have to set up."
"The ability to have both the time domain and frequency domain, where the frequency domain is a very broad spectral plot, is extremely valuable."
"The user interface is pretty good. Right now, it is more than what we expected. It's easy and fast to use."
"The most valuable features are the accuracy and repeatability."
"The noise sensitivity: It has a low noise floor."
"It has a good user interface. It's easy to use, easy to read. It's intuitive."
"It is easy to handle, so everyone likes to use it."
"The most valuable features are everything they do. We primarily use the O-scopes and they help us figure out what's going wrong with our scope out signals."
"The user interface is good."
"The Tektronix user interface is like an Apple iPhone, but for oscilloscopes. It is simple to use."
"It provides you the best way to view information without opening multiple applications, like a single solution."
"Valuable features include that it's multi-channel... and has bandwidth filtering. The user interface is good."
"Time domain measurement is very accurate compared to other devices."
"I'm against the Windows-based tools. Now everybody is running scopes, VNAs, and all their tools based on Windows. I don't want to see that in the future."
"It would be good if they would try to automate most things because it has more pressing buttons and repetitive work. If there were automation scripts that they could provide, that would improve things."
"We would like to have autotracking and auto error tracking for regression testing. We would like to know what error happened, when it happened, and during what scenario (such as setup), because right now we have to manually look at when it happened."
"The user interface could be improved, e.g., the documentation on the menus. I have to open a separate document to figure out the functionality sometimes."
"The depth the the user GUI could be improved. It is a bit deep for new users. During the first two weeks we spent a lot of time finding the tabs."
"In the next release, I would like to see report generation. It would make it a lot easier to refer back to and, when doing final testing, seeing what went on during the pre-test would help."
"Sometimes, it's difficult to find menus on the user interface."
"The Rohde & Schwarz user interface is very oriented towards drop and drag functions on the screen. Some of those are just not obvious how to use. You have to have somebody get you over the hump."
"I wish we could turn off the automatic measurement feature of the oscilloscope, for teaching purposes."
"I would like to see more integration into machine learning because that's what we try to apply it to."
"I would like to see some WiFi capabilities. I would like to upgrade equipment, and if I was in the U.S., I could do that with WiFi capabilities."
"If they could make the user interface even more intuitive that would help. If they could make it easier to read, to know where the buttons are, that's all I need."
"There is room for improvement when it comes to the screen size. I don't really have a lot of complaints but screen size would be the biggest thing."
"I want the system to have a wider bandwidth because high-speed continues to move faster, so there is more bandwidth to cover."
"I use microservices, but you cannot really probe it, since the technology is not really there."
"We would like more features for the CAN bus decoding, such as importing DDC files, which allows us to take the raw data and convert it into engineering units."
More Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes Pricing and Cost Advice →
Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes is ranked 5th in Oscilloscopes while Tektronix Oscilloscopes is ranked 2nd in Oscilloscopes. Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes is rated 8.2, while Tektronix Oscilloscopes is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes writes "The ability to have both the time domain and frequency domain, where the frequency domain is a very broad spectral plot, is extremely valuable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tektronix Oscilloscopes writes "High sampling rate enables it to clearly render the envelope". Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes is most compared with Keysight Oscilloscopes, Siglent, RIGOL Oscilloscopes, Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes and Anritsu Oscilloscopes, whereas Tektronix Oscilloscopes is most compared with Siglent, Keysight Oscilloscopes, Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes, RIGOL Oscilloscopes and Yokogawa Oscilloscopes.
See our list of best Oscilloscopes vendors.
We monitor all Oscilloscopes reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
