Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SAP BW4HANA vs SQL Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

SAP BW4HANA
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
Data Warehouse (9th)
SQL Server
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
266
Ranking in other categories
Relational Databases Tools (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

SAP BW4HANA and SQL Server aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. SAP BW4HANA is designed for Data Warehouse and holds a mindshare of 4.5%, down 4.6% compared to last year.
SQL Server, on the other hand, focuses on Relational Databases Tools, holds 21.4% mindshare, down 23.1% since last year.
Data Warehouse
Relational Databases Tools
 

Featured Reviews

DilipRoshantha - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good value for money to users
There have been no hiccups for my company when it comes to integrating SAP products with the data analytics and the transactional systems since my company uses SAP PI for it, but lately my organization has been using SAP Process Orchestration for data integration. With SAP, there is a small visualization part inside SAP BW4HANA. I can visualize some of the reports with the help of SAP BW4HANA. The tool can be configured and is compatible with all SAP applications, which makes it a good product. I believe that the product has the capabilities to cater to various business requirements. The product does offer value for money. There are big customers along with medium or small customers. Small and medium-sized customers cannot afford the cost of the tool's licensing. From a value point of view, in business terms, it is good. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.
Kapil Dev Khatri - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps monitor queries and identify which indexes need to be created in the databases
SQL Server is very simple due to its GUI, which is available for users. It allows for modifications and has execution plans available, along with options such as activity monitoring. This helps monitor queries and identify which indexes need to be created in the databases, tables, or columns to improve performance.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Its direct approach is the most valuable. You get more real time and capabilities than BW."
"I like the tool's robustness and security."
"I like that it's quite quick."
"Out of the box, this solution has a lot of standard features."
"It is a stable solution."
"It's quite scalable."
"Provides a great analytics engine with all the capabilities."
"The solution's performance is really good. Also, it's easy to operate, easy to administer, and relatively simple to install."
"This solution has proven stability and operational power."
"The solution seems to be pretty flexible."
"Tuning Advisor suggests where to add indexes and from where to remove them. It works like an adviser."
"One of the things I most like about SQL Server is the log shipping piece. This is a great feature."
"SQL Server scales well."
"Very good security features."
"Enables us to convert to bigger DBs and more easily move or upgrade between branches."
"The license fee is very low."
 

Cons

"I would like to be able to design new reports in a future release."
"Other competitors provide better solutions that are more up to date with current technology."
"One thing that could be enhanced in SAP BW4HANA is the user interface for process chains."
"The tool is not cloud-compatible."
"The solution is not scalable. It does not have a data streaming feature as well."
"The licensing cost could be made better."
"Real-time processing isn't BW/4HANA's strongest point."
"I don't see SAP actively supporting the solution now...a better support from SAP would be appreciated."
"The agility of the non-SQL-based features is relevant on the market."
"SQL Server could be more robust than one of its competitors."
"They need to improve their support. It should be faster."
"Their support could be better. There should be more visibility on the progress of the ticket, and their last line of support should be more knowledgeable. Other than that, we have nothing to complain about."
"When transferring data from the SQL Server to Excel, the data types are not copied correctly. This issue might be associated with the formatting of the data types."
"SQL Server could improve by increase the performance, it cannot handle large amounts of data. I did not find any additional features compared to others solutions."
"Microsoft support is an issue unto itself."
"More things in SQL Server need to be automated."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."
"The price is high and currently only affordable for large organizations."
"We have a broad licensing arrangement, which is expensive but worth it for sizeable businesses."
"It is an expensive product."
"SAP BW/4HANA is expensive."
"The SAP HANA application still hasn't been leveraged to the fullest extent, but it's a five-year enterprise license."
"In general, it's quite expensive."
"It's a little expensive compared to Microsoft Azure."
"SQL Server is an expensive solution."
"SQL Server offers three versions. You can get a free trial for 30 days."
"We pay approximately $12,000 USD per month for both the server and the license."
"We didn't have any licensing costs for SQL Server."
"There is a license required to use the solution and I am satisfied."
"There is no licensing cost for SQL Server."
"I would rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten. It is not extremely cheap but also it's not the most expensive product."
"It is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
18%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Educational Organization
50%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SAP BW4HANA?
One significant advantage of SAP BW/4HANA is the direct integration with the SAP HANA database, providing seamless access to real-time analytics. Additionally, it enables real-time data integrati...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP BW4HANA?
We have a broad licensing arrangement, which is expensive but worth it for sizeable businesses.
What needs improvement with SAP BW4HANA?
The interface could be more user-friendly, as we often need to do low-level coding to get things done.
Would you say the price of SQL Server is high compared to that of similar products?
SQL Server is fairly priced because it has various editions, depending on the number of users, servers, or core packs you are using. If you compare the product to others in this category, the price...
Has using SQL Server helped your organization in any way?
SQL Server has helped my organization through partitioning to distribute the workload, as it splits them up into smaller pieces so the machines can easily deal with it. However, this comes with a h...
Which authentication mode is best for SQL Server?
My company connects through SQL Server authentication. We have company Windows accounts, but we do not want to connect the two, out of security concerns and to keep things separated for our own pur...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

SAP BW/4HANA
Microsoft SQL Server, MSSQL, MS SQL
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Microsoft SQL Server is used by businesses in every industry, including Great Western Bank, Aviva, the Volvo Car Corporation, BMW, Samsung, Principality Building Society, Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield, and the Catholic District School Board of Eastern Ontario.
Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Oracle, Teradata and others in Data Warehouse. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.