Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SAP BW4HANA vs SQL Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

SAP BW4HANA
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
Data Warehouse (9th)
SQL Server
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
266
Ranking in other categories
Relational Databases Tools (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

SAP BW4HANA and SQL Server aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. SAP BW4HANA is designed for Data Warehouse and holds a mindshare of 4.5%, up 4.5% compared to last year.
SQL Server, on the other hand, focuses on Relational Databases Tools, holds 22.0% mindshare, down 23.0% since last year.
Data Warehouse
Relational Databases Tools
 

Featured Reviews

DilipRoshantha - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good value for money to users
There have been no hiccups for my company when it comes to integrating SAP products with the data analytics and the transactional systems since my company uses SAP PI for it, but lately my organization has been using SAP Process Orchestration for data integration. With SAP, there is a small visualization part inside SAP BW4HANA. I can visualize some of the reports with the help of SAP BW4HANA. The tool can be configured and is compatible with all SAP applications, which makes it a good product. I believe that the product has the capabilities to cater to various business requirements. The product does offer value for money. There are big customers along with medium or small customers. Small and medium-sized customers cannot afford the cost of the tool's licensing. From a value point of view, in business terms, it is good. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.
AhmadTalha - PeerSpot reviewer
A robust and secure solution that helps to store data
The GUI needs improvement. From a technical perspective, it's quite complex, which may not be a problem for individuals with technical backgrounds like ours, especially since we've encountered similar interfaces. However, navigating the GUI can be challenging for newcomers or product owners without technical experience. For example, as someone transitioning from a developer role to a product management role, I find it relatively easy to use the GUI. But for those without a technical background, it's much more challenging to grasp what's happening.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Its direct approach is the most valuable. You get more real time and capabilities than BW."
"The solution saves time and cost."
"The most valuable feature is that we can transform a huge amount of data and apply business logic as per the requirements."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The solution is useful for connecting with external systems."
"The most valuable feature is that it's robust."
"The solution is based on SAP ERP, so there's some business content already included. For customers who use SAP ERP, SAP BW4HANA is a good choice for their DW implementation."
"I like the tool's robustness and security."
"It's a very capable, efficient, price-performant OLAP server."
"SQL Server stands out due to its robust parallel processing capabilities."
"It's a good option for those that have a lot of Microsoft solutions in use."
"We have found the solution to be scalable."
"It is a typical database solution, and it is working well so far. It is easy to use, and it is also very common and popular, which makes it easy to find a support partner."
"Agent service is a good feature of SQL Server, where you can schedule certain tasks."
"The columnstore index feature is useful for us, and we also use the integration services. It is also very stable."
"The solution is valuable because it seamlessly extracts reports and enables the collection of information from different tables."
 

Cons

"The product needs to improve with more performance and fewer data layers."
"SAP BW/4HANA can generally be less flexible than other tools, depending on how it is set up."
"It takes too long to escalate problems from the first level of support."
"Real-time processing isn't BW/4HANA's strongest point."
"The monitoring for the remodeling feature is very difficult to understand."
"I would like more integration."
"I cannot integrate it with my other tools. It's not possible to do something in the predictive analysis. Mobile reporting is also not available."
"Pricing would be a good improvement. A lot of customers think that it's very expensive and especially support is very expensive."
"The solution needs to be more secure. It's lacking, compared to, for example, Oracle."
"The pricing and quality of the product could be improved."
"Improvements to the indexing, columnstore indexing, and high availability groups are good improvements for future versions."
"Its support for JSON should be improved. It does support JSON, but the support is not good enough currently. They should also improve the way indexes work. Its performance can also be improved because sometimes it becomes very slow for certain table designs. It cannot have more than a certain amount of data. As compared to other databases, its capability to handle large volumes of data is not very good."
"It's difficult to make changes. It's a very complicated product in general — that's the issue."
"The product performance can become slow when the data reaches sizes like a terabyte."
"I would like to see improvements made to the stability of SQL Server, as well as more analytics requirements."
"There are a few use cases where we do need the Active-Active options instead of Active-Passive, yet those kinds of options are not available for Microsoft."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an expensive solution and there are costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"In general, it's quite expensive."
"The price is high and currently only affordable for large organizations."
"We started as early birds from the SAP side. We got this entire suite for free. I cannot really talk about the price because we didn't have to pay anything."
"The SAP HANA application still hasn't been leveraged to the fullest extent, but it's a five-year enterprise license."
"Price wise, this solution is on the higher side."
"The cost and licensing depends on how the customer is going to use the solution."
"The product is free if we have the ECC license."
"The price of the solution is fine."
"SQL Server is an expensive solution."
"SQL Server is an expensive solution."
"It is something we have been using for a lot of years. If we're paying, it should be reasonable."
"The price could be better. Aside from the basic features, if you need any additional features that can be extended, for example, if you want to connect with the heterogeneous databases, they are being managed as separate services and not included in the package. If you manage a database in Azure, it's not providing SFS and reporting services. However, on-premises, if you purchase the SQL Server license, it includes SFIS and SFRS services. If you take Postgre SQL and MySQL, they provide almost all the same features even though they are both open source databases."
"It is expensive."
"We're looking at alternative solutions because we think Microsoft's licensing costs have been expensive."
"I don't know the exact prices because my focus is essentially technical and not on the bills. A few years ago, they changed the billing policy for the Enterprise Edition, and it became less attractive. But I believe they are still cheaper than Oracle. SQL Server isn't cheap, but it's not expensive either."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
18%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Educational Organization
49%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SAP BW4HANA?
One significant advantage of SAP BW/4HANA is the direct integration with the SAP HANA database, providing seamless access to real-time analytics. Additionally, it enables real-time data integrati...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP BW4HANA?
We have a broad licensing arrangement, which is expensive but worth it for sizeable businesses.
What needs improvement with SAP BW4HANA?
The interface could be more user-friendly, as we often need to do low-level coding to get things done.
Would you say the price of SQL Server is high compared to that of similar products?
SQL Server is fairly priced because it has various editions, depending on the number of users, servers, or core packs you are using. If you compare the product to others in this category, the price...
Has using SQL Server helped your organization in any way?
SQL Server has helped my organization through partitioning to distribute the workload, as it splits them up into smaller pieces so the machines can easily deal with it. However, this comes with a h...
Which authentication mode is best for SQL Server?
My company connects through SQL Server authentication. We have company Windows accounts, but we do not want to connect the two, out of security concerns and to keep things separated for our own pur...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

SAP BW/4HANA
Microsoft SQL Server, MSSQL, MS SQL
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Microsoft SQL Server is used by businesses in every industry, including Great Western Bank, Aviva, the Volvo Car Corporation, BMW, Samsung, Principality Building Society, Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield, and the Catholic District School Board of Eastern Ontario.
Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Oracle, Teradata and others in Data Warehouse. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.