Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SAS Fraud Management vs Sift Digital Trust and Safety comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SAS Fraud Management
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Sift Digital Trust and Safety
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
24th
Average Rating
6.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of SAS Fraud Management is 4.8%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sift Digital Trust and Safety is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

AK
Monitor multiple channels with a single platform
Each bank has a lot of different verticals. Before, for each and every vertical, they had to implement a different fraud solution. Presently, the main purpose of SAS is to maintain a centralized platform for all of the verticals — like agriculture, NSME, and home loans. For each and every vertical, they created a centralized platform where the bank can monitor everything from one system. That is the main purpose of SAS Fraud Management. It is a little bit costly. Otherwise, it's pretty good. Suppose you are going to create a data science model or an analytical model. With Python, you have to write long subcodes, but with SAS, you just have to drag and drop those things. If you know all of the logic and all of the theories, then it's a very comfortable tool to use. The security is also very good. That's why most of the industry is adopting SAS. Data security is very good because the Reserve Bank of India has approved it. That said, almost all the banks are now implementing SAS as an all-in-one solution.
reviewer1528731 - PeerSpot reviewer
Has a good 90-day POC but needs better machine learning and an updated user interface
We primarily use the solution for fraud chargeback, for securing the e-commerce store It's nice to be able to have access to a 90-day POC process. The user interface can be improved upon. The product needs to add more elements of machine learning. In a future release, I'd like to see a…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The security is also very good."
"The solution is easy to use."
"It's nice to be able to have access to a 90-day POC process."
 

Cons

"Occasionally, there are some mechanisms that can work a bit slow."
"The user interface can be improved upon."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If your company has the budget, I would absolutely recommend SAS."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
849,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
31%
Computer Software Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Educational Organization
7%
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Educational Organization
10%
Hospitality Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nets
Doordash, Zoosk, Zirtue,Traveloka, Cozy
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: April 2025.
849,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.