Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Semmle QL vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.0
Spirent CyberFlood is viewed as scalable but limited in expandability, reflecting diverse user experiences and satisfaction levels.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.5
Spirent CyberFlood offers a user-friendly traffic generator and flexible network monitoring tools, ideal for adaptable, efficient solutions.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.5
Spirent CyberFlood needs improved port availability, speed, storage, frequent updates, language options, browser support, and error reporting.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Spirent CyberFlood's customer service is praised for its local team, providing effective support with a satisfaction rating of 7/10.
 

Categories and Ranking

Semmle QL
Ranking in Application Security Tools
41st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Spirent CyberFlood
Ranking in Application Security Tools
35th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (32nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Semmle QL is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spirent CyberFlood is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Use Semmle QL?
Share your opinion
Haider Jarral - PeerSpot reviewer
I like the solution's flexibility
Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?
Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more detail...
What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?
I use CyberFlood to generate SSL traffic for cybersecurity testing.
 

Also Known As

No data available
CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Murex, Trafigura, Dell, Dropbox, Nordea, Citi, Credit Suisse
Digicel
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.