Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Snare vs Venusense USM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Snare's customer service is praised for quick responses and knowledgeable staff, with only occasional delays in support response times.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
3.8
Snare requires better reporting, alerting, performance, technical support response times, and improved documentation for easier configuration and troubleshooting.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
9.3
Snare is praised for its scalability, efficient data handling, smooth integration, and suitability for both small and large businesses.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Snare provides scalable, flexible pricing based on deployment size, features, and support, with discounts for multi-year commitments.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Snare is reliable, efficiently processes logs, handles high loads, and has minor bugs quickly fixed by support.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.8
Snare offers customizable log management, scalable architecture, real-time monitoring, robust security, system integration, and detailed reporting capabilities.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Snare
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
43rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (44th)
Venusense USM
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
65th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Snare is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Venusense USM is 0.0%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Frank Eargle - PeerSpot reviewer
A highly scalable solution that is easy to manage and super easy to set up
We use Snare for picking up Windows logs, and we used to use it for SQL as well. We had used it for Linux once or twice. We're mainly using it for Windows and Windows flat files The most valuable feature of Snare is flexibility or the ability to filter all things you don't want and don't have…
Use Venusense USM?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Snare?
The best thing about Snare is its format and consistency.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Snare?
Snare is a cheap solution because a lot of customers are using it.
What needs improvement with Snare?
Users will initially find it difficult to identify the event types and installation in Snare.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Military, Defence and Security Agencies, Banking Finance and Insurance companies, Retail, Health and Utilities.
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Microsoft, Wazuh and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.