Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Spirent CyberFlood vs w3af comparison

Spirent and w3af are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Spirent is ranked #35 with an average rating of 7.0, while w3af is ranked #45. Spirent holds a 0.1% mindshare in AS, compared to w3af’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Spirent users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of w3af users who would recommend it.
Spirent CyberFlood
Read 4 Spirent CyberFlood reviews
  • 150 Views
  • 97 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
w3af
Read 1 w3af review
  • 239 Views
  • 117 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Spirent CyberFlood and w3af based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,067 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Spirent CyberFlood
Ranking in Application Security Tools
35th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (32nd)
w3af
Ranking in Application Security Tools
45th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Spirent CyberFlood is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of w3af is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Haider Jarral - PeerSpot reviewer
I like the solution's flexibility
Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing.
Read full review
OS
It's buggy and seems to try to do too many things, but having this on a USB drive has been valuable.
I tried to install this on numerous systems and eventually, with help, I got it running. It needs far too many dependencies installed and there's too much messing about to be of much use. Once running, it's buggy and begs the question can it be relied upon? Even within Kali it reports website time-outs, yet Zap or Burp are able to do a successful scan. I wanted this to work so much and be able to use it as an additional check of my results but have now binned it.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
22%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Spirent CyberFlood?
CyberFlood is flexible.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?
Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more detail...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?
I use CyberFlood to generate SSL traffic for cybersecurity testing.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood Logo
Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood
Compared 73% of the time
Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood Logo
Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood
Compared 27% of the time
More Spirent CyberFlood Competitors
Acunetix vs w3af Logo
Acunetix vs w3af
Compared 100% of the time
More w3af Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
December 2024
Spirent CyberFlood reportDownload Spirent CyberFlood product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
December 2024
w3af reportDownload w3af product report
 

Also Known As

CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing
No data available
 

Learn More

Spirent
Video not available
w3af
 

Overview

Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

w3af is a Web Application Attack and Audit Framework. The project's goal is to create a framework to help you secure your web applications by finding and exploiting all web application vulnerabilities. Our framework is proudly developed using Python to be easy to use and extend, and licensed under GPLv2.0.
 

Sample Customers

Digicel
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
December 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.