Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

StrongLoop Arc vs StrongLoop LoopBack comparison

StrongLoop Arc and StrongLoop LoopBack are both solutions in the Software Components category. StrongLoop Arc is ranked #13, while StrongLoop LoopBack is ranked #12. StrongLoop Arc holds a 0.2% mindshare in SC, compared to StrongLoop LoopBack’s 1.3% mindshare.
StrongLoop Arc
  • 27 Views
  • 13 Comparison Views
StrongLoop LoopBack
  • 56 Views
  • 27 Comparison Views

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

StrongLoop Arc
Ranking in Software Components
13th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
StrongLoop LoopBack
Ranking in Software Components
12th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Software Components category, the mindshare of StrongLoop Arc is 0.2%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StrongLoop LoopBack is 1.3%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Components
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Learn More

IBM
IBM
 

Overview

StrongLoop Arc is a visual tool suite for creating, packaging, deploying, profiling, managing, and monitoring Node applications and APIs.

LoopBack is a highly-extensible, open-source Node.js framework that enables you to:

  • Create dynamic end-to-end REST APIs with little or no coding.
  • Access data from major relational databases, MongoDB, SOAP, and REST APIs.
  • Incorporate model relationships and access controls for complex APIs.
  • Use separable components for file storage, third-party login, and OAuth 2.0.
 

Sample Customers

Carnegie Mellon University, Vasaloppet, Baylor College of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Cxense ASA, University of Zurich, CLOUD M, Memorial University of Newfoundland, WeCloud AB, Darwin Ecosystem, Living Roads, Ilmarinen
Telefonica | Vivo, meteolytix GmbH
See our list of best Software Components vendors.

We monitor all Software Components reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.